BTC $77,169.25 -1.66%
ETH $2,259.12 -1.42%
BNB $699.33 -1.92%
XRP $1.25 -0.53%
SOL $92.47 -2.57%
TRX $0.3199 +2.18%
DOGE $0.0743 -2.13%
ADA $0.1896 -2.52%
BCH $277.81 -1.98%
LINK $11.12 -2.56%
HYPE $84.39 -4.24%
AAVE $126.34 -7.57%
SUI $0.8719 -3.55%
XLM $0.1623 -4.12%
ZEC $1,154.54 -7.99%
AAPL $329.75 -4.14%
AMZN $246.40 +1.79%
GOOGL $280.93 -1.21%
MSFT $508.17 -2.85%
META $609.79 -1.24%
NVDA $204.71 -1.49%
TSLA $404.77 +0.67%
SNDK $1,096.34 -7.82%
INTC $61.18 -8.54%
SPCX $137.63 -0.95%
MU $846.12 -7.12%
AMD $476.05 -8.05%
BTC $77,169.25 -1.66%
ETH $2,259.12 -1.42%
BNB $699.33 -1.92%
XRP $1.25 -0.53%
SOL $92.47 -2.57%
TRX $0.3199 +2.18%
DOGE $0.0743 -2.13%
ADA $0.1896 -2.52%
BCH $277.81 -1.98%
LINK $11.12 -2.56%
HYPE $84.39 -4.24%
AAVE $126.34 -7.57%
SUI $0.8719 -3.55%
XLM $0.1623 -4.12%
ZEC $1,154.54 -7.99%
AAPL $329.75 -4.14%
AMZN $246.40 +1.79%
GOOGL $280.93 -1.21%
MSFT $508.17 -2.85%
META $609.79 -1.24%
NVDA $204.71 -1.49%
TSLA $404.77 +0.67%
SNDK $1,096.34 -7.82%
INTC $61.18 -8.54%
SPCX $137.63 -0.95%
MU $846.12 -7.12%
AMD $476.05 -8.05%

ssi

All
Article
Flash

first_img SEC Updates Token Classification FAQ: Adapting to DUNA Entities, Clarifying Issues of Functionality and Decentralization Boundaries, etc

a16z Chief Legal Counsel Miles Jennings posted on X that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has released new FAQs that further clarify its token classification framework. He pointed out that Question 1.4 clearly states that systems can maintain decentralized governance and use legal entities such as DUNA; Question 1.5 distinguishes between licensed and unlicensed systems; and Question 1.6 clarifies the difference between "functional" and "decentralized."The SEC's Division of Corporation Finance updated the relevant Q&A on November 2. The response to Question 1.4 states that participants in a widely governed functional crypto system, if not interconnected and without formal or informal collaborative arrangements other than participating in that governance system, typically do not constitute a group of persons or entities defined as "centralized parties"; even if they do form such a group, they must still possess operational, economic, or voting control to meet the definition of "centralized parties." This conclusion also applies to cases where the governance system belongs to an organization, association, or foundation, and participation is based on holding native crypto assets.The response to Question 1.5 states that centralized party oversight of participants refers to the authority to control access to the system at the protocol, validator, or user level, such as unilaterally granting or restricting access, deciding on upgrade voting procedures, controlling who can participate in consensus, or modifying rule code, revoking transactions, and access. The response to Question 1.6 states that "functional" refers to native crypto assets being usable according to the system's programmed purposes, while "decentralized" refers to the system operating autonomously without any person, entity, or group having operational, economic, or voting control; the two are distinct concepts. The above responses represent the views of the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance and do not constitute SEC rules or statements.

Bloomberg: After $6.3 billion was stolen, Binance increased some market maker commissions to stabilize liquidity

According to Bloomberg, after Binance experienced a record $6.3 billion hack, it has increased incentives for some market makers trading on the platform to boost trading activity. Sources familiar with the matter revealed that shortly after the security breach, the company reached out to smaller trading firms to offer higher commissions in the spot and futures markets.Sources indicated that during this week-long initiative, so-called level 2 and level 3 market makers would receive the same commission rates as level 4 participants, which is the highest tier on the platform. The sources added that these changes are aimed at providing greater financial incentives for smaller liquidity providers to quote on the trading platform and maintain a deeper order book.According to information on its website, Binance primarily categorizes market makers into different tiers based on the liquidity they provide, with companies offering larger trading volumes qualifying for higher tiers, typically receiving larger commissions, thereby reducing their trading costs. A Binance spokesperson stated that the latest measures following the security breach help to calm the market and noted that, just as prioritizing clear communication is important, the company took immediate action to maintain its core competitive advantage in liquidity. According to data from Talos, within 24 hours after the hack, the depth of the Bitcoin order book on Binance dropped by about 30%, with the depth within a 1% price range falling from $45 million to $32 million.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.