EFUT

TRUMP Meme Coin team refutes rumors of a "300,000 USD dinner participation threshold."

ChainCatcher news, according to Cointelegraph, the Meme coin team of U.S. President Trump has denied rumors circulating on social media that official TRUMP token holders need at least $300,000 to attend an upcoming dinner with Trump.The rumor originated from community members citing information from the Solana blockchain explorer that displayed the token contract address holders. As of the time of writing, the explorer shows that the 220th holder possesses 33,114 TRUMP tokens, valued at over $400,000. However, the Meme coin team stated that the explorer does not reflect their standards.The team wrote in a statement: "People mistakenly took the data of the 220th holder on the blockchain explorer as a qualification line, which is inaccurate. This data includes locked tokens, exchange holdings, market maker holdings, and holdings of users who did not participate in the activity. Actual participation eligibility should be based on the official leaderboard."According to information from the Meme coin official website, the team will select winners based on "time-weighted holdings," a metric that takes into account both the number of tokens held and the duration of holding.Additionally, Trump's Meme coin team clarified that the rumor about "unlocking a large number of tokens" for this competition is also untrue. They stated that currently, user "Sun" is in the lead with 1,176,803 TRUMP (worth about $14 million), while the user in 220th place, "HAR," holds only 35.3 TRUMP (worth about $420).

Vitalik refutes the statement that "the Ethereum research team accepts the idea of centralizing everything."

ChainCatcher news, Vitalik Buterin refuted the statement made by Ethereum team lead Péter Szilágyi regarding "the research team fully accepting the idea that everything centralized as long as it can be verified": "I just attended the EF research workshop last week, and I can confirm this is incorrect. We had various discussions on minimizing centralization, including:In-depth analysis of multi-proposers to see if we can completely eliminate the builder role;Maximizing the power of inclusion lists (FOCIL);Ideas on fork choice depending on the inclusiveness of transactions;Analysis of Orbit SSF and ideas on accelerating the deployment of the Orbit mechanism, which could reduce the minimum deposit size by more than 10 times before we conduct SSF;Distributed block building for PeerDAS;Networking analysis and bandwidth optimization for PeerDAS and fullDAS;Making recovery from 51% attacks more partially automated, reducing reliance on the 'social layer';Ensuring inclusion lists are fully applicable to (i) blobs and (ii) native account abstraction (e.g., EIP-7560) transactions."Previously, Ethereum team lead Péter Szilágyi expressed concerns on social media about the direction of Ethereum's development, with his views involving the Ethereum PeerDAS proposal, which suggests increasing the Ethereum blob size to 32 MB. Szilágyi believes that the PeerDAS upgrade will hinder home stakers (typically those with simpler computational setups) from participating in the Ethereum network, which goes against the spirit of decentralization.

The OpenAI board refutes negative allegations against Sam Altman made by former board members

ChainCatcher news, according to Decrypt, just days after OpenAI announced the establishment of a new safety committee, former board members Helen Toner and Tasha McCauley publicly accused CEO Sam Altman of prioritizing profits over responsible AI development, concealing key progress from the board, and fostering a toxic environment within the company.However, current board members Bret Taylor and Larry Summers strongly defended Altman today, refuting these accusations and insisting on Altman's commitment to safety and governance.They wrote, "We do not accept the claims made by Ms. Toner and Ms. McCauley regarding the events at OpenAI, and we regret that Ms. Toner continues to revisit issues that have been thoroughly investigated instead of moving forward."The two former board members stated that Altman's "long-standing pattern of behavior" has prevented the company’s board from adequately overseeing "key decisions and internal safety protocols." However, Altman's current colleagues pointed out that an independent review commissioned by the company concluded: "The review's findings refute the notion that any AI safety issues warrant replacing Altman. In fact, the investigation found that previous board decisions were not made out of concern for product safety or security, development speed, OpenAI's financial status, or its statements to investors, customers, or business partners."Regarding the allegations of Altman fostering a toxic company culture, Taylor and Summers also refuted these claims, stating that Altman is highly respected by employees and expressing that Altman is committed to working with the government to mitigate the risks of AI development.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators