Cryptocurrency company

Bloomberg: The Ripple case is a good sign for other crypto companies fighting the SEC

ChainCatcher news, according to Bloomberg, last week a federal judge ordered Ripple Labs Inc. to pay a $125 million civil penalty because the company sold its XRP tokens to institutional investors without registering with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This fine is just a small part of the $2 billion the agency is seeking, which could be good news for other crypto companies fighting the SEC.Ripple's case began in December 2020 when the SEC sued Ripple and its executives, accusing them of "creating an information vacuum." This lawsuit united the entire crypto industry in support of XRP. More than a dozen advocacy groups wrote to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, supporting Ripple's position. Since then, the SEC has initiated enforcement actions against several crypto companies. However, Ripple's case is seen as a potential milestone that could set a precedent regarding whether cryptocurrencies are considered securities.The judge issued an injunction prohibiting Ripple from further violating securities laws. However, she rejected the SEC's request for Ripple to return sales profits, stating that the case "does not involve allegations of fraud, misappropriation, or other more serious conduct," and that the SEC failed to prove that Ripple's unregistered sales caused significant losses to investors.The SEC may challenge the judge's ruling in an appeal. Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliot Stein stated that Torres's latest ruling is favorable for Coinbase Global Inc. in its fight with the agency and may increase its chances of obtaining a favorable ruling in the case.

a16z Partner: While Crypto Companies Fall into "Regulatory Hell," Meme Coins Thrive

ChainCatcher news, according to Cryptopotato, 16z partner Chris Dixon expressed concerns about the U.S. regulatory system, questioning why meme coins can thrive while cryptocurrency companies and blockchain tokens with useful applications are "stuck in regulatory hell" due to the possibility of being classified as securities.Chris Dixon stated, "But my goal is not to defend or diminish meme coins. It is to point out the absurdity of the U.S. regulatory system, which allows only meme coins to flourish while crypto companies and blockchain tokens with more efficient uses face obstacles. We see this every day when working with entrepreneurs and startups. Any meme creator can easily create, launch, and even automatically list a token. But what about those entrepreneurs trying to create something lasting? They are stuck in regulatory hell."Dixon referred to this as the distinction between "computers and casinos," where one culture focuses on innovation while the other focuses on speculative trading. He advocated for better regulatory frameworks to protect investors and prevent get-rich-quick schemes.Dixon also drew a parallel to the post-Great Depression era, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework in the cryptocurrency market while advocating for a system that recognizes the different characteristics of tokens to ensure a fair, efficient, and secure market for investors.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators