Clarity

Bloomberg: Wall Street giants are optimistic about potential opportunities in the crypto custody space, awaiting election results and regulatory clarity

ChainCatcher news, according to Bloomberg, so far, crypto-native companies like Coinbase Global Inc. and BitGo Inc. have been the dominant service providers, while traditional financial firms mostly remain in a holding pattern due to concerns over regulatory uncertainty surrounding digital assets.Although the current custody market is only about $300 million, the business remains attractive, with companies like Fireblocks Inc. estimating an annual growth rate of around 30% for the industry.Leading custody banks such as BNY Mellon, State Street Corp., and Citigroup Inc. have begun to dip their toes into the cryptocurrency custody space or have expressed interest. Despite facing setbacks, these companies are experimenting, with many plans focused on the protection of tokenized assets.For example, JPMorgan Chase & Co. operates a project called Onyx, which allows blockchain payments between bank clients. In December last year, a custody trust and clearing company acquired Securrency to provide products for tokenizing traditional financial assets. In August of this year, State Street chose the vendor Taurus for the tokenization and custody of digital asset services.One major issue hindering the entry of established financial institutions is a U.S. SEC regulation known as SAB 121, which prevents highly regulated financial companies from offering cryptocurrency custody services. President Biden vetoed efforts by Congress to overturn the rule. Several banks have received exemptions.

Fox Business reporter: The crypto industry has achieved a significant victory in the clarity of secondary market digital asset sales

ChainCatcher news, Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terrett posted on X that in the latest developments of the SEC lawsuit against Binance, the crypto industry has achieved a significant victory in terms of clarity regarding the sale of digital assets in the secondary market.Judge Amy Berman Jackson stated, "......the government's reliance on the assertion that 'crypto assets are manifestations of investment contracts,' as well as its arguments during the hearing regarding the technical nature, platform interdependence, and the performance of each token, are insufficient to categorically include the secondary sale of BNB within the scope of investment contracts.Moreover, this agreement is somewhat inconsistent with the singular theory that the government has been advancing since the filing of the lawsuit: we are not saying these tokens are securities—what we are discussing is investment contracts."Earlier today, it was reported that a federal judge dismissed part of the SEC's lawsuit against Binance and its founder CZ, but allowed other charges to proceed, including those against Binance.US.Later on Friday, Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the SEC's claims against Binance regarding its ICO, BNB, BNB Vault, staking services, and unregistered and fraudulent charges can continue. She granted the motions of Binance and CZ, dismissing the charges related to secondary BNB sales and Simple Earn.

a16z policy chief: The SEC should collaborate with crypto industry participants to provide clarity, as enforcement regulation may stifle innovation

ChainCatcher news, a16z policy chief Brian Quintenz stated that the current actions of the SEC are a continuation of an irresponsible enforcement regulatory model, which harms entrepreneurs, investors, and consumers, while potentially stifling innovation and forcing responsible companies to leave the United States.Coinbase has been a responsible participant in the industry for over a decade, having helped open Web3 in the U.S. As a publicly traded company, it has repeatedly attempted to register with the SEC and has long called for common-sense regulation, but the regulators have not responded. Enforcement actions cannot replace guidance. It is inappropriate to litigate whether specific tokens are securities through enforcement actions against third parties (such as these exchanges), and it does little to protect consumers or provide clarity to the market. The SEC should work with market participants to modernize the rules and clarify their application, which would be a responsible approach aligned with their established mission.Blockchain technology and Web3 have the potential to democratize various industries. However, for this innovation to happen in the U.S., the government must provide clear rules to follow, rather than just litigation. It has been four years since the SEC last issued meaningful crypto-related guidance. Ironically, today’s actions occurred after a proposal was introduced in Congress that would provide clear rules—protecting Americans and rooting out bad actors in the industry. The SEC should collaborate with Congress and responsible U.S. cryptocurrency companies to provide clarity—rather than exacerbate confusion. (source link)
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators