resist

Slow Fog Cosine: Using wallet whitelist mechanisms and combining hardware wallets for dual verification can resist "transaction record pollution attacks."

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist's Yu Xian disclosed that the phishing technique of poisoning addresses with similar starting and ending numbers is still widespread, severely impacting the security infrastructure of the blockchain industry.Yu Xian pointed out that this type of poisoning targeting wallet transaction history mainly involves various techniques, including fake token contract codes emitting false event logs to deceive block explorers and wallets, as well as using zero-amount transfer event logs to arbitrarily fill in addresses in the from/to fields. These techniques can mislead users into believing that the transactions are from their own actions. Other common techniques include sending small amounts of funds from source addresses with the same starting and ending characters, combining clipboard hijacking technology, and impersonating well-known decentralized exchanges to output false event logs.Yu Xian recommends that users make good use of wallet whitelisting mechanisms, carefully verify complete addresses, and combine well-known hardware wallets for dual verification as defensive measures.Previously reported, two addresses suffered "transaction history pollution attacks" in the past 14 hours, resulting in a total loss of over $140,000.

Glassnode: The Bitcoin cost basis distribution shows that holders in the 60K-67K range are strong, while 96K-98K may serve as a strong resistance level

ChainCatcher message, according to Glassnode analysis, by tracking the cost basis distribution of Bitcoin over the past 6 months, key accumulation and redistribution trends can be identified, providing insights into investors' market positioning during the recent sell-off.Data shows that from the end of September last year to the end of October, there was strong accumulation of Bitcoin in the $60K-$67K range. Addresses holding this cost basis are still holding, and their Bitcoin supply remains visible. The stair-step pattern indicates that these addresses continued to accumulate Bitcoin from November to February, with some investors still increasing their cost basis, showing sustained participation.From the end of December last year to February this year, there was strong accumulation in the $96K-$98K range. Although some addresses in these price ranges are redistributing their Bitcoin, this supply cluster remains very dense, and if prices return to these levels, it could form strong resistance.A one-month view shows some Bitcoin distribution at the $96K-$98K level, particularly from the accumulation of Bitcoin over the past week and early February. Arrows indicate that investors who bought in September/October are active here, increasing their cost basis or continuing to accumulate. A one-week view shows a new demand cluster between $84K-$92K. The current question is whether there is enough demand at these levels to absorb selling pressure.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators