mETH

Scam Sniffer: Please be aware of a new Telegram scam method where fake crypto KOLs spread malware

ChainCatcher news, Scam Sniffer has issued a security warning, revealing a new type of composite scam targeting cryptocurrency users. This scam has two main attack paths: system infection and account hijacking. The scammers first disguise themselves as well-known cryptocurrency KOLs, commenting on legitimate posts to lure users into joining so-called "exclusive investment" Telegram groups. Once users join the group, they will immediately receive a verification request from a fake bot named OfficiaISafeguardBot. These verifications are usually set with very short time windows, creating a sense of urgency.On a technical level, the verification process injects malicious PowerShell code into the clipboard without the user's knowledge. Once executed, it will automatically download and run malware that can compromise system security. These malware have been flagged as malicious by VirusTotal and have recently caused multiple incidents of private key theft. Another attack method is to induce users to provide Telegram account-related information, including phone numbers, login verification codes, and two-step verification passwords, thereby gaining complete control over the user's Telegram account.Scam Sniffer offers the following security recommendations:Do not execute commands from unknown sourcesCarefully verify the authenticity of official channelsBe vigilant about any verification requests with time pressureUse hardware wallets to store cryptocurrency assetsAvoid running arbitrary code and installing unknown softwareNever share Telegram verification codes and two-step verification passwords

MetaMask co-founder: Meme coin issuers should limit token sale methods, and the community should not be filled with users making personal threats

ChainCatcher news, according to Cointelegraph, MetaMask co-founder Dan Finlay has recently been experimenting with issuing meme coins on Ethereum and Solana to explore issues of user consent and trust in the Web3 ecosystem. He issued tokens named "Consent" and "I Don't Consent" on Ethereum and Solana through the Clanker bot and Pump.fun platform, respectively. The results of the experiment showed that rapid trading activity led to a significant inflation of the token's value, with Finlay's holdings at one point exceeding $100,000.However, the experiment revealed many issues within the meme coin ecosystem. Due to the lack of clear positioning and purpose for the tokens, investors continuously attempted to assign more meaning to them, with some even threatening Finlay or demanding a long-term development plan. Finlay likened this phenomenon to the issue of data usage consent in the AI field, specifically mentioning Bluesky's practice of using public posts for AI training without explicit user consent, calling for the establishment of a more robust trust mechanism and user consent framework in the Web3 ecosystem.Finlay stated that the meme coin ecosystem urgently needs better tools and incentive mechanisms. He suggested creating new systems that allow token issuers to have fine control over their tokens, including restricting trading within specific communities and providing structured sales methods. He emphasized that this is not only a matter of ethics but also about building better products, stating, "Applications should not become toxic asset pools, and communities should not be filled with users issuing personal threats; your shares should not be diluted by anonymous whales."

The Qianhai Court in Shenzhen ruled on a wage payment dispute case, deciding that virtual currency cannot be used as a method of wage payment

According to ChainCatcher news, the Shenzhen News Network reported that the People's Court of Qianhai Cooperation Zone in Shenzhen recently made a ruling on a labor dispute case involving virtual currency salary payments. The case originated in June 2021, when the plaintiff, Zhou, joined a company as a senior engineer, claiming that he had agreed with the company on a monthly salary of 45,000 yuan, of which 20,000 yuan would be paid via bank transfer and the remaining 25,000 yuan in the form of USDT. Two months later, the company terminated the labor contract on the grounds of "skills not matching," but did not pay the agreed portion of the salary in virtual currency.The court determined that, according to the "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" issued by the central bank and ten other departments in September 2021, virtual currencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT do not have legal tender status. At the same time, Article 50 of the Labor Law and Article 5 of the Interim Provisions on Wage Payment clearly state that wages must be paid in legal currency on a monthly basis and cannot be replaced by other forms.Ultimately, the court only supported the plaintiff's claim regarding the unlawful termination of the labor contract, ordering the company to pay 10,000 yuan in compensation. The case was upheld by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court in the second instance.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators