judgment

Neiro CTO responds to doubts: Choosing Gotbit as a market maker was a stopgap measure due to the urgency of going public, and is willing to take responsibility for this judgment error

ChainCatcher news, in response to crypto detective ZachXBT questioning why Neiro initially chose the notoriously poor-reputed Gotbit as a market maker, Neiro's CTO co-lead "S" stated that when Sun Yuchen's tweet led to its listing on HTX, there was actually only a few hours to find one, making time critical. The choice of Gotbit was partly because the market maker offered a retention agreement at that time, which was the most affordable option so far, and partly because the project viewed it as a quick solution for the HTX listing (with the agreement with Gotbit lasting 3 months), planning to explore other options when the budget allowed. Additionally, there was a lack of judgment experience regarding the industry; although they had heard various bad things about Gotbit, they had also heard bad things about almost everyone in the industry, making it difficult to make a judgment."S" also mentioned: "I had not had direct contact with Gotbit before, so I chose to trust them and gave them a chance. Gotbit also marketed itself as a 'meme coin friendly' market maker, which seemed like an attractive proposition.""S" concluded: "But ultimately, I take full responsibility for this; I should have been more careful. I am deeply pained by this outcome and have paid a huge price for it. At the same time, it has given us a tremendous learning opportunity, forcing us to fundamentally improve the project by collaborating with better and more market makers to reduce counterparty risk and upgrade the Neiro trading market."Previous news, on-chain detective ZachXBT commented on Neiro's announcement to terminate its partnership with market maker Gotbit, suggesting that perhaps Neiro should explain to the community why they initially chose Gotbit, given their consistently poor reputation and the substantial evidence of Gotbit's price manipulation behavior before the U.S. government accused them of fraud and market manipulation this week.

Hubei cracks down on virtual currency pyramid scheme, with an involved amount exceeding 57 million yuan

ChainCatcher news reports that, according to Jimu News, the People's Procuratorate of Zhongxiang City, Hubei Province recently made a ruling on a major virtual currency pyramid scheme case. The main offenders Chen, Ding, and Fu were sentenced to three years in prison, with a five-year probation, and each fined 350,000 yuan for organizing and leading a pyramid scheme.In February 2022, the three main offenders developed and launched a virtual currency trading APP, using investment in virtual currency as a pretext to establish a pyramid scheme organization called "Certain Community." The organization extensively promoted through internet platforms and offline training sessions, enticing members to purchase virtual currency and recruit downlines. The organization was divided into five major battle zones and 16 vanguard groups, implementing strict hierarchical management.As of December 2022, when the case broke, the organization had developed over 10,000 member accounts, with the highest level reaching 17 tiers, involving an amount exceeding 57 million yuan. The three main offenders have voluntarily returned all illegal gains of over 22.59 million yuan. Prosecutors emphasized that virtual currency does not have the same legal status as legal tender, and related business activities are illegal financial activities that will be strictly prohibited. The public should remain vigilant against false promises of "guaranteed profits" and reject high-interest temptations like "recruiting others" to avoid falling into similar pyramid scheme traps.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators