crypto

JPMorgan: The Trump administration may see positive progress in cryptocurrency regulation, but the likelihood of approval for the strategic Bitcoin reserve is very low

ChainCatcher news, according to The Block, JPMorgan analysts outlined six key regulatory and market changes for the cryptocurrency industry under the Trump administration that could reshape the landscape of cryptocurrency in the U.S. under the leadership of Trump and the Republican-led Congress.JPMorgan analysts indicated that several stalled cryptocurrency bills may quickly gain approval. These bills include the "Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act" (FIT21), which could provide much-needed regulatory clarity for the crypto industry by clearly defining the regulatory responsibilities of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).They also stated that as the regulatory framework becomes clearer, the SEC's strategy of increasing enforcement may evolve into a more collaborative approach. High-profile lawsuits against companies like Coinbase may be eased, settled, or even dismissed. Regulatory notices sent to companies like Robinhood and Uniswap could be reconsidered, thereby reducing the litigation risk for the broader crypto industry. The SEC's "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121" (SAB 121), which restricts banks from holding digital assets, may be repealed.Additionally, JPMorgan analysts noted that the SEC may seek to resolve lawsuits concerning unregistered securities and require the launch of futures-based ETFs for these assets before approving spot ETFs. These factors could delay the approval of new ETFs or require re-filing. Clearer regulations may increase venture capital, mergers and acquisitions, and initial public offerings in the cryptocurrency space. Although strategic Bitcoin reserves would significantly enhance Bitcoin's legitimacy and could potentially drive up its price, the likelihood of this passing is low.

Hong Kong Monetary Authority: Cryptocurrency institutions providing services in Hong Kong under the name of "bank" may be illegal

ChainCatcher news, according to the official website, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) urges the public to remain vigilant and be cautious of certain overseas crypto asset institutions that are not licensed banks in Hong Kong. They claim to be "banks" in Hong Kong or use the term "bank" when describing their products or services. These actions may have violated the Banking Ordinance.The HKMA has noted that two overseas crypto asset institutions that are not licensed banks in Hong Kong held activities in Hong Kong. During the events, one of them was reported to have referred to itself as a "bank," while the other described its card products on its website as "bank cards." The HKMA is concerned that the statements made by these institutions may mislead consumers into believing they are licensed banks in Hong Kong and regulated by the HKMA, or that such products and services are provided by licensed banks in Hong Kong.The HKMA reminds the public that crypto asset institutions not recognized by Hong Kong are not regulated by the HKMA. The inclusion of the term "bank" in the name of overseas crypto asset institutions, or claims by overseas "crypto banks" of having obtained licenses elsewhere, does not mean they are necessarily licensed banks in Hong Kong. Furthermore, products or services with the term "bank" in their name are not necessarily provided by licensed banks in Hong Kong.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators