ChainCatcher news, according to Protos, "Australian" Craig Wright argues that he cannot attend the court meeting in December due to his severe autism and the Christmas schedule, following accusations of contempt of court in a legal application submitted to the Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance (COPA).The law firm Bird and Bird, representing the Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance, stated that Craig Wright violated his injunction after deleting online notices and filing lawsuits against Jack Dorsey's Square Up and BTC Core.In addition, the Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance seeks to suspend Wright's lawsuits and halt related court proceedings until the contempt of court lawsuit is resolved. Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance lawyer Jonathan Hough stated, "Wright is trying to evade the consequences of his actions. He may want to avoid the police or prevent being detained."

ChainCatcher news, according to Protos, Craig Wright seems to be representing himself in the latest lawsuit against Bitcoin Core and Jack Dorsey's payment company Square. Bitmex Research points out that the UK High Court case tracking shows that Wright recently filed a lawsuit as a "party," indicating that he may be pursuing the case without legal representation.Although the lawsuit specifically names the software used for distributing Bitcoin, Bitcoin Core, and Square Up Europe Ltd., the case tracking page does not specify the purpose of the lawsuit.Recently, Wright posted an article on X regarding the lawsuit and legal threats against MicroStrategy, but it is currently unclear whether this is related to the lawsuit.He is attempting to file three legal appeals in the UK, all of which are awaiting approval. Two of them are against the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), and one is against Peter McCormack.

ChainCatcher news reports that Craig Wright, known as "Satoshi Nakamoto," filed a lawsuit against BTC Core and Jack Dorsey's payment company Square in the High Court of England on October 10 as a "litigant in person," without hiring a lawyer. The specific purpose of the case has not been disclosed.Craig Wright also posted legal threats related to MicroStrategy on the X platform, and it remains unclear whether they are related to this lawsuit.Additionally, Craig Wright is currently attempting to initiate three appeals in the UK, two of which are against the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA).

ChainCatcher news, Craig Wright, known as "Satoshi Nakamoto," officially released a statement acknowledging that he is neither the creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, nor the author and copyright owner of the Bitcoin white paper.Previous news, the judge ruled that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto, nor the author of the Bitcoin white paper.

ChainCatcher news, UK judge James Mellor approved the injunction of COPA, which will prohibit Craig Wright from suing others again in the name of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto. James Mellor also stated that he would refer Craig Wright to the Crown Prosecution Service for consideration of prosecuting him for perjury.

ChainCatcher news, market news, Craig Wright, who claims to be the inventor of Bitcoin ("Satoshi Nakamoto"), has been referred to the UK prosecutor for alleged perjury.

ChainCatcher news, according to Bitcoin News, the High Court in London has issued a worldwide freezing order (WFO) against Craig Wright, requiring him to pay £1.548 million to cover Peter McCormack's legal fees in the defamation case brought by Wright in 2019.

ChainCatcher news, according to Protos, after Craig Wright's failed attempt to prove in court that he is the anonymous founder of the Bitcoin protocol, the Bitcoin white paper has been re-uploaded to the Bitcoin.org website. Hennadii Stepanov, a maintainer of Bitcoin.org, announced the return of the Bitcoin white paper by sharing a link to the PDF of the white paper on X.It is reported that in 2021, Wright successfully sued the anonymous organization Cøbra, which operates the website, for copyright infringement, and the website was subsequently ordered to take down the white paper PDF. However, as Wright's claims about Satoshi Nakamoto's identity and his authorship of the white paper have been thoroughly discredited, his copyright victory has lost its validity. When Wright sued Cøbra, the organization was required to participate in court hearings that could potentially compromise its anonymity.

ChainCatcher news, according to Protos citing What The Finance, former nChain CEO Christen Ager-Hanssen was sentenced to 10 months in prison at a hearing in the UK High Court on May 3 for leaking documents that exposed Craig Wright.The court found Ager-Hanssen in violation of multiple court orders, including deleting the leaked documents, disclosing recipients, and handing over relevant devices. The leaked documents were the Fairway Brief, which involved Craig Wright's false claims of impersonating Satoshi and accused Calvin Ayre and others of orchestrating a "criminal conspiracy" to take over nChain's intellectual property at a low price.The court viewed Ager-Hanssen's noncompliance with the orders as an attempt to undermine the authority of the court and nChain's confidentiality requests, thus merging the sentences of 10 months and 4 months, with his expected release in five months. Ager-Hanssen plans to appeal, with support from the UK whistleblower organization Whistleblowers UK, which pointed out the disconnect between UK whistleblower laws and justice, failing to effectively protect whistleblowers.

ChainCatcher news, according to BitMEX Research, the ruling in the lawsuit against "Satoshi Nakamoto" Craig Wright by COPA (Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance) has now been published.In the ruling, Craig Wright is far from as clever as he believes himself to be. In his written testimony and several days of oral testimony during cross-examination, it is abundantly clear that Wright lied extensively and repeatedly to the court. Most of his lies relate to the forged documents he created to support his claims. All of his lies and forged documents were aimed at supporting his biggest lie: that he claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto.The reality is much simpler. However, due to Dr. Wright's numerous lies over the years, it is difficult in some respects to pinpoint exactly what happened. These difficulties do not affect the established fact that Dr. Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto.As for the so-called evidence supporting his claims, this evidence is at best questionable or highly dubious, or completely coincidental; at worst, it is fabricated and/or based on documents that are believed to have been massively forged by Dr. Wright.These fabrications and forgeries were revealed in the evidence presented during the trial. For this reason, the ruling contains a wealth of technical and other details aimed at exposing the true scale of his false claims to prove that he is/was Satoshi Nakamoto. These details are elaborated in the extensive written closing arguments prepared by COPA and the developers, and further emphasized in their oral closing debates.

ChainCatcher news, according to The Block, "Australian" Craig Wright has stopped his appeal against the defamation case related to his claim of being the anonymous Bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto, which he lost in 2022.The appeal was directed against Norwegian citizen Magnus Granath, who goes by the pseudonym "Hodlonaut," and published harsh remarks about Craig Wright on Twitter (now known as X). In 2022, a Norwegian judge supported Granath's choice of wording and other written statements regarding Craig Wright, which Wright sought to appeal.

ChainCatcher news, according to Coindesk, UK judge James Mellor has issued a global freezing order on Craig Wright's £6 million assets to prevent him from transferring these assets overseas and evading costs arising from court cases.In a ruling on March 14, Judge James Mellor, who presided over the case brought by the Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance (COPA), found that Craig Wright is neither the author of the Bitcoin white paper nor the author of the initial version of the Bitcoin software. Shortly after the ruling, Wright notified the UK Companies House that his shares in RCJBR Holding had been transferred to DeMorgan in Singapore.

ChainCatcher news, UK judge James Mellor stated today after the closing arguments in the trial of the Crypto Open Patent Alliance that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto and is not the author of the Bitcoin white paper. James Mellor added that he plans to write a ruling declaring that Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto, is not the creator of Bitcoin, is not the author of the Bitcoin white paper, and is not the creator of Bitcoin technology.

ChainCatcher news, according to CoinDesk, during the legal proceedings in the fourth week that began in London on Monday, Craig Wright's former lawyer stated in court that the emails shared by Wright's wife as evidence in the ongoing trial are "not authentic." The trial is investigating whether Wright invented Bitcoin.Last week, during cross-examination of the self-proclaimed Bitcoin inventor Wright, emails between Wright and a former representative of Ontier were cited. Following this, Wright's wife, Ramona Watts, shared these emails with Wright's current lawyers at the London law firm Shoosmiths, who then contacted Ontier to confirm their accuracy. Wright claims that Ontier visited the Australian accounting platform MYOB in 2019, and he has emails to prove this. However, Ontier stated that the emails shared by Wright's wife with Shoosmiths were forged. The Shoosmiths law firm disclosed these emails and Ontier's response in court on Monday. Now, these documents will be analyzed by Wright and the plaintiff's lawyers (the Crypto Open Patent Alliance, COPA).Before the emails were disclosed, Wright's team consulted digital forensics expert Patrick Madden, whose digital forensics report forms the basis of Wright's claim that he is the creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto.

ChainCatcher news, "Satoshi Nakamoto" Craig Wright has proposed a settlement to the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPC) and the parties involved in the upcoming intellectual property litigation.Craig Wright stated that the primary focus of the previous legal proceedings was not to reveal his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto, but to ensure that Bitcoin remains true to its core principles.It is reported that Craig Wright has agreed to waive his database rights and copyrights in BTC, BCH, and ABC, and that this settlement proposal aims to preserve the integrity of the Bitcoin system as it was initially developed, while limiting unnecessary costs of lengthy trials in the High Court for all parties involved. The effective time for the agreement is 7 days.

ChainCatcher news, recently, there has been new progress in the legal dispute regarding the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto and the rights to Bitcoin. A UK judge has rescheduled the trial between Craig Wright (Faketoshi) and Bitcoin core developers to February 5.On December 15, during a pre-trial review, Justice Edward James Mellor allowed Wright to submit an additional 97 documents to support his claims. These documents were allegedly found on two USB drives discovered in his home drawer in September, including LaTeX files—an open-source document preparation system used for drafting the Bitcoin white paper. Bitcoin developers accuse Wright of fabricating evidence, forging and tampering with metadata, and deliberately delaying the litigation process. According to them, the new documents were revealed only after they submitted 50 pieces of evidence proving that the materials previously submitted by Wright were forged.Judge Mellor also approved a second security application from the developers, ordering Wright to pay an additional £800,000 (approximately $1 million) by January 5 to cover the developers' legal costs in case of losing the case. Wright has deposited £100,000 (approximately $127,000) as a bond.

ChainCatcher news, according to CoinDesk, a UK court has ruled that Craig Wright (Satoshi Nakamoto) and his company Tulip Trading need to prove ownership of approximately 110,000 bitcoins, which are at the heart of a case brought against a group of Bitcoin developers in 2021.Previous reports indicated that the Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund submitted a preliminary question application to the UK High Court, stating that "Satoshi Nakamoto" Craig Wright lacks evidence to prove he actually owns the claimed lost 111,000 bitcoins. "If Craig Wright is the owner of the bitcoins in the address starting with 1Feex, he has effectively admitted to being the person who stole 80,000 BTC from Mt. Gox, as the widely accepted view in the cryptocurrency community is that the bitcoins stored in the address starting with 1Feex originated from the 2014 March Mt. Gox hacking incident."