Zuckerberg

Data: Mark Zuckerberg ranks fourth in global net worth, and Meta's market value exceeds 1.4 trillion USD

ChainCatcher news, tech entrepreneur Mark Zuckerberg is now the fourth richest billionaire in the world, with a net worth of $201 billion. In October 2021, he renamed Facebook to Meta and expanded into the fields of metaverse hardware and artificial intelligence. As of this writing, the tech giant Meta's current stock price is approximately $567 per share, more than six times the stock's low of about $88 per share in November 2022. Meta's current market capitalization exceeds $1.4 trillion, making it one of the most valuable companies in the world.In the year following the rebranding, Meta's stock price significantly dropped from a trading price of $300 to a low in November 2022, reflecting investor unease about the company's shift towards augmented reality experiences and artificial intelligence development. Since then, half of the world's ten most valuable companies have begun developing metaverse hardware, including Apple, Google, Nvidia, and Microsoft. According to Bloomberg, as of September 2024, Zuckerberg's net worth ranks just behind Elon Musk, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, and French businessman Bernard Arnault.Zuckerberg previously stated that Meta would narrow the company's business scope and increase capital investment in artificial intelligence research to expand its business in that area. He explained during the earnings call on July 31, "We have released our first cutting-edge open-source AI model, and our Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses continue to be in high demand."

Meta's founder admits that the Biden administration pressured his team to review content on the platform

ChainCatcher news, the founder and CEO of Meta admitted that the Biden administration pressured his team to review content on the platform. Zuckerberg stated:"In 2021, senior officials from the Biden administration, including the White House, pressured our team multiple times to review certain content related to COVID-19, including humorous and satirical content, and when we disagreed, they expressed great frustration with our team. Ultimately, the decision to remove content was ours, and we are responsible for our decisions, including the modifications made under this pressure regarding COVID-19 related content.""I believe the government's pressure was wrong, and I regret not being more outspoken at the time. I also think we made some choices that, in hindsight and based on new information, we should not have made. As I told our team at the time, I firmly believe we should not compromise our content standards due to any government pressure.""In another instance, the FBI warned us that there might be a Russian disinformation campaign regarding the Biden family and Burisma before the 2020 election. That fall, when we saw the New York Post's report on corruption allegations involving then-Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden's family, we sent the report to fact-checkers for review and temporarily reduced its distribution weight while waiting for a response.It later became clear that this report was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we should not have reduced its distribution weight. We have changed our policies and processes to ensure this does not happen again."
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators