Vertu

Custodia seeks a judge to overturn the Federal Reserve's decision to deny its master account application

ChainCatcher news, according to Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terrett sharing information on X, the digital asset bank Custodia Bank has submitted a brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, challenging a Wyoming judge's decision granting the Federal Reserve unrestricted power to deny its master account.Custodia is asking the appellate court to instruct the Wyoming district court to reverse its decision to deny Custodia's application for a master account and to grant it a master account.Custodia CEO Caitlin Long has hired two senior Supreme Court attorneys to defend her company. Here are some key points they argue:Custodia's lawyers claim that the Federal Reserve's power to refuse to open a master account for state-chartered banks undermines the dual banking system, which allows banks to freely choose whether to operate under state or federal charters;They also argue that the Federal Reserve discriminates against state-chartered banks seeking to obtain master accounts, which may violate the Monetary Control Act, a law that allows state-chartered banks seeking Federal Reserve services to gain fair access;They emphasize the use of the word "shall" in the Monetary Control Act by Congress, stating that "all services of Federal Reserve Banks... shall be open to non-member deposit institutions," to illustrate Congress's intent to allow all eligible banks equal access to Federal Reserve services.Previously, Custodia hoped to operate as an uninsured bank, issuing a stablecoin backed by cash and other assets. However, the Federal Reserve determined that the bank was not entitled to a master account in the Federal Reserve System and denied its application to join the Federal Reserve System, indicating that the Federal Reserve aims to isolate payment rails from crypto assets. It is reported that a Federal Reserve account allows holders to transfer reserves directly to another financial institution without another intermediary.

Biden may reconsider exercising veto power over the resolution to overturn SEC SAB 121

ChainCatcher news, before the U.S. House of Representatives voted on H.J. Res. 109 (which aims to overturn the SEC's SAB 121 regulation regarding digital assets), President Biden issued a threat statement indicating that he might exercise his veto power using executive authority if a resolution to overturn the SEC's policy were to pass. The White House stated that it "strongly opposes" House members' attempts to undermine the SEC's measures to "protect investors in the cryptocurrency market and safeguard the broader financial system."It is worth noting that in previous administrations, about one-third of veto threats were never acted upon, so it does not necessarily mean that a veto will be executed. Given the bipartisan support for the bill, Biden may have to weigh the pros and cons.Patrick Kirby, the policy head of the Crypto Council for Innovation, explained, "The president has 10 days (excluding Sundays) to sign the resolution into law, allowing it to become law without his signature or veto."Additionally, the SEC could decide to withdraw SAB 121 to avoid forcing Biden to decide whether to exercise his veto. (Cointelegraph)Previously, the U.S. Senate passed a resolution to overturn the SEC's SAB 121 by a vote of 60 to 38; however, this resolution may be vetoed once it reaches President Biden's desk.It is reported that the SEC's previously issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 requires companies to record their held cryptocurrency assets on their balance sheets, but critics argue that this regulation is overly stringent and effectively hinders major custodians and companies from holding cryptocurrency assets for their clients.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators