ChainCatcher message, the PolkaWorld Chinese community stated on X that PolkaWorld opposed most of the so-called proposals to increase Polkadot's exposure during the first half of the year as a DV. Polkadot currently does not lack so-called advertising exposure and should not spend money on advertising exposure that has no conversion. Any advertising and exposure should be based on the product; otherwise, it is ineffective exposure and wasteful spending. Currently, what the Polkadot community needs the most is:Empowering teams that have already built great products, providing them with liquidity incentives to attract users to use these great products;Continuously nurturing and discovering new teams, new products, and new applications;Only when a user-friendly unicorn application emerges can it attract a large number of users to the Polkadot ecosystem and keep them within the Polkadot ecosystem.

According to ChainCatcher news from PolkaWorld, Polkadot OpenGov Proposal No. 231 suggests using the regular investment feature of the Polkadot ecosystem exchange HydraDX to periodically convert a portion of the treasury's DOT into USDT, in order to accumulate USDT for paying salaries to Technical Fellowship members.The total amount for this conversion plan is 469,000 DOT, with transaction fees accounting for approximately 0.4% of the total conversion amount. Conversions will occur approximately every 36 minutes, with each transaction yielding 250 USDT, resulting in a daily acquisition of 10,000 USDT. At the current price, the conversion plan is expected to last for 180 days. The strategy of small, frequent conversions is intended to reduce the impact of price volatility. Currently, the approval rate for this public vote is 64.3%, and it is in the decision-making period (ending in 19 days and 21 hours).

ChainCatcher news, the Polkadot Chinese community PolkaWorld stated that due to the rejection of the proposal for official funding, PolkaWorld has suspended operations for half a month.PolkaWorld also criticized Polkadot's new governance framework, OpenGov. The original intention of OpenGov was to make Polkadot's governance more decentralized while improving the efficiency and transparency of the treasury. However, the management mechanism of the treasury under this framework has led to many long-term contributors and organizations' funding applications being repeatedly rejected, forcing these groups to leave the Polkadot ecosystem.PolkaWorld explained that under the previous governance framework, DOT holders would elect a council with expertise to evaluate specific proposals. This effective treasury mechanism should be integrated into the OpenGov governance framework. However, under the current OpenGov governance framework, DOT holders often resist all proposals that would cash out the treasury reserves, which prevents many long-term contributors and organizations from receiving the funding they deserve.PolkaWorld called for all DOT holders to realize that the existence of the treasury is to promote the development of the ecosystem. If OpenGov leads to the loss of ecological projects, it may mean that DOT holders are making incorrect votes under OpenGov.