BTC $81,412.08 +2.23%
ETH $2,368.94 +2.63%
BNB $749.12 +1.83%
XRP $1.33 +2.44%
SOL $102.64 +2.87%
TRX $0.3316 +1.43%
DOGE $0.0801 +4.04%
ADA $0.2072 +1.91%
BCH $299.77 +6.27%
LINK $11.81 +4.19%
HYPE $82.13 +5.67%
AAVE $135.41 +3.57%
SUI $0.9414 +3.77%
XLM $0.1719 +2.55%
ZEC $1,317.88 +6.37%
AAPL $346.63 +0.85%
AMZN $254.08 +1.79%
GOOGL $325.01 +1.81%
MSFT $530.04 -0.07%
META $623.66 -1.27%
NVDA $219.80 +1.57%
TSLA $409.69 +3.50%
SNDK $1,363.02 +7.17%
INTC $95.42 +4.80%
SPCX $150.02 +1.10%
MU $964.33 +4.79%
AMD $569.15 +6.69%
BTC $81,412.08 +2.23%
ETH $2,368.94 +2.63%
BNB $749.12 +1.83%
XRP $1.33 +2.44%
SOL $102.64 +2.87%
TRX $0.3316 +1.43%
DOGE $0.0801 +4.04%
ADA $0.2072 +1.91%
BCH $299.77 +6.27%
LINK $11.81 +4.19%
HYPE $82.13 +5.67%
AAVE $135.41 +3.57%
SUI $0.9414 +3.77%
XLM $0.1719 +2.55%
ZEC $1,317.88 +6.37%
AAPL $346.63 +0.85%
AMZN $254.08 +1.79%
GOOGL $325.01 +1.81%
MSFT $530.04 -0.07%
META $623.66 -1.27%
NVDA $219.80 +1.57%
TSLA $409.69 +3.50%
SNDK $1,363.02 +7.17%
INTC $95.42 +4.80%
SPCX $150.02 +1.10%
MU $964.33 +4.79%
AMD $569.15 +6.69%

pol

PoL (Proof of Liquidity) is a consensus mechanism designed to validate transactions through the provision of liquidity. Unlike traditional Proof of Work (PoW) or Proof of Stake (PoS), PoL rewards participants with block rewards for providing liquidity. This mechanism is commonly used in decentralized exchanges (DEX) or liquidity pools to incentivize users to provide liquidity, thereby enhancing market efficiency and stability. The advantage of PoL lies in its ability to encourage more liquidity providers to participate, strengthening market depth and trading liquidity.
All
Article
Flash

Apollo Chief Economist: The profit margins of the seven tech giants are rising, while the rest of the S&P companies are stagnant

The chief economist of the American asset management firm Apollo, Torsten Sløk, released five charts, believing that AI has not yet brought significant financial returns to large American companies outside of the tech giants. The per capita revenue and profit margins of the seven tech giants continue to rise; excluding them, the 493 companies in the S&P have seen these two metrics remain basically stagnant, and the data on total factor productivity in the U.S. has not shown significant signs of AI-driven growth.Apollo cited data from the corporate payment platform Ramp, stating that among its clients, the top 10% of companies by spending contributed 99.5% of the model hosting and inference costs. Among the top 1% of companies with the highest AI spending, about 80% have venture capital backgrounds; for companies at the median spending level, this ratio is only 13%. A large amount of AI computing power consumption is concentrated in a few companies, many of which rely on venture capital support.Previous statistics from Apollo indicated that during the second quarter earnings season of 2026, 69% of S&P 500 companies had disclosed that they were actually using AI, but only 2% reported metrics for ongoing tracking of effectiveness. Another NBER study updated in October this year surveyed nearly 9,000 corporate executives from seven countries, with respondents estimating that over the past three years, AI has only improved the annual growth rate of labor productivity in companies by about 0.2 percentage points.

first_img South Korean police arrested 7 people in the first large-scale AI-assisted hacking case

Seoul police arrested 7 suspects accused of using generative AI to launch hacking attacks. The Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency stated that about 90 organizations were involved, collectively stealing 8.2 million records, marking the first large-scale arrest of suspects in AI-assisted hacking attacks in South Korea. The targeted victims included hospitals, universities, private tutoring centers, golf courses, and subsidiaries of large corporate groups, all of which held a significant amount of personal information, including names, contact details, and records of ordinary citizens. One funeral service company lost 1.22 million records, and reports indicated that the tutoring center's data also contained information on minors.According to local media reports, the main suspect, 32 years old, studied arts and sports and has no IT background. He told investigators that he self-taught hacking techniques through YouTube and online blogs, while police pointed out that he had worked in a security company conducting simulated attacks from 2019 to 2022. He initially used website vulnerability scanning tools and later introduced AI coding proxies and an automated penetration testing system called Artex at the end of August. Police stated that he hacked into 60 companies over a span of 44 days from August 31 to October 13.The entire attack operation lasted about 13 months, from September 2025 to this October, and the case was filed in June after a victim reported it. Police indicated that such a large-scale attack previously required a hacker group to accomplish, but AI now allows one person to achieve this in a short time. The suspect sent emails to 38 victims, collectively extorting 360 million Korean won, approximately 272,000 US dollars, but the only confirmed payment was 300,000 won, about 210 dollars. The main suspect was detained and transferred to prosecutors last Friday, facing charges of violating South Korea's Information and Communication Network Act, as well as extortion and attempted extortion. Police will continue to investigate the other 6 accomplices and confirm more victims, with 15 institutions already reporting damages.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.