The judge demands that the U.S. SEC explain the misleading behavior in the cryptocurrency case
ChainCatcher news, according to Bloomberg, in a lawsuit filed this summer, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company named Digital Licensing Inc. of defrauding investors of nearly $50 million by selling unregistered securities called "node licenses." As part of the initial proceedings, the SEC successfully obtained a temporary restraining order and asset seizure through a so-called unilateral application.District Judge Robert Shelby, who approved the SEC's request, stated that he agreed to the SEC's request because SEC attorney Michael Welsh indicated that the cryptocurrency company was closing bank accounts to move the company to Abu Dhabi to evade the scrutiny of U.S. regulators. This turned out to be untrue. Shelby noted in his order that some of the SEC's arguments were "completely unfounded and distorted the record." He also found that it was the banks, not the company, that closed certain accounts, and that a purported $720,000 overseas transfer used by the SEC to justify the unilateral seizure was actually a domestic transfer.Shelby believed that the SEC may have misled the court in describing the facts used to justify the previous order. To this end, Shelby requested that the SEC provide reasons why the Utah court should not penalize it for its actions, demanding a response to its apparent falsehoods, including the agency's claims about closing bank accounts and blocking social media. Shelby expressed concern that "the SEC has undermined the integrity of the litigation process."An SEC spokesperson stated, "We have received the order to show cause and will respond to the court as directed." The agency has two weeks to respond to Shelby's order.