Chief Legal Officer

Foreign media: If Trump wins, Robinhood's chief legal officer will be a major contender for the SEC chair

ChainCatcher news, according to POLITICO, a dozen former senior regulators, lobbyists, and securities lawyers have indicated that if Donald Trump regains the presidency, Robinhood's Chief Legal Officer Dan Gallagher would be a candidate for chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It is currently unclear whether Gallagher wants to leave Robinhood. Gallagher has stated that he loves his job and that "I am honored to be mentioned in discussions about who will be the next SEC chairman." However, there is no doubt that Gallagher has significant disagreements with the direction of the SEC. He mentioned that if he had served as chairman over the past few years, there would have long been tailored rules, as the industry has long sought, providing "at least a basic registration system pathway" for cryptocurrency exchanges and brokers. Even so, Gallagher believes that legislation is still needed.Gallagher previously served as a commissioner of the SEC, known for his affability and political skills. Other potential candidates for SEC chairman circulating on Wall Street under the Trump administration include former Commodity Futures Trading Commission chairman Chris Giancarlo, former SEC General Counsel Robert Stebbins, current partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher law firm, and current SEC commissioner Hester Peirce. However, reports suggest that for some Republicans, whether Gallagher can become chairman has always been a matter of when, not if.

Kraken and Ripple's Chief Legal Officers: Court Rules That Tokens Traded on Kraken Are Not Securities

ChainCatcher news, according to Bitcoin.com, Kraken's Chief Legal Officer Marco Santori recently commented on the ruling of the Northern District of California Federal Court. It is reported that Kraken sought to dismiss the lawsuit from the U.S. SEC, which claims that certain cryptocurrencies traded on the Kraken platform are considered securities; however, the court rejected Kraken's request.However, Santori stated: "As a legal matter, the Northern District of California Federal Court ruled that the tokens traded on Kraken are not securities, which is a significant victory for Kraken and for the principle of transparency and crypto users everywhere. This also confirms Kraken's long-standing position that the platform does not list securities."Additionally, Santori pointed out that the court criticized the SEC's definition of "crypto asset securities" as "not clear enough, to put it nicely, and confusing, to put it harshly," while also questioning the SEC's description of Kraken's request for a "written contract" for securities classification.Santori added: "Fundamentally, the court in the Kraken case made the same distinction as in the Ripple case: tokens are not securities, but the agreements made around the tokens may be securities."He further emphasized the broader implications for the crypto industry, warning that the SEC's enforcement-based regulatory approach could lead to "broad, expensive, and time-consuming discovery" for a large number of transactions. He urged Congress to establish a comprehensive market structure framework to ensure regulatory clarity and promote the development of blockchain technology.Ripple's Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty, commenting on Santori's remarks, stated: "Another court, this time in the Kraken case, confirms that there is no such thing as 'crypto asset securities.' This is bad news for the SEC, as its entire enforcement regulatory strategy is built on this failed premise."

Coinbase Chief Legal Officer: Disputes SEC's Expanded Definition of "Exchange"

ChainCatcher news, Coinbase's Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal posted on social media that Coinbase today submitted an objection to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding its proposal to expand the definition of "exchange." The SEC's proposal lacks critical analysis, is based on unreasonable assumptions, fails to demonstrate the existence of issues that require regulation, and significantly exaggerates the benefits of the proposal. Here are the main points of concern:Lack of Economic Analysis: The SEC failed to collect basic information or conduct economic analysis to assess the impact of the proposal on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), yet continues to push its unreasonable assumptions;Potential Impact on DEXs: Coinbase emphasizes that the SEC should not extend the proposal to DEXs, as this could have significant implications for millions of Americans using digital assets and could harm innovation in the rapidly growing DEX market.Assumption of Issues' Existence: The SEC starts from the assumption that there are issues in the industry that need to be corrected but fails to prove the existence of such issues.Coinbase believes this is not the correct way to formulate rules, and the proposal should at least be withdrawn and revised. Ongoing Dialogue with the SEC: Coinbase expresses gratitude for the SEC's serious consideration of its comments and looks forward to further discussions on this important topic.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators