cryptocurrency mining

Data: 16 listed cryptocurrency mining companies have spent 3.6 billion dollars on facility, property, and equipment upgrades so far this year

ChainCatcher news, according to Cointelegraph, based on year-to-date data, 16 publicly listed crypto mining companies have spent a total of $3.6 billion on property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) upgrades, including new mining hardware. So far in 2024, these 16 mining companies have raised over $5 billion, with the third quarter being the highest period for PP&E spending since the first quarter of 2022. Spending on mining hardware accounts for the majority of PP&E expenditures. Since 2023, publicly listed mining companies have spent a total of $2 billion on hardware upgrades. The report explains that the lifespan of crypto mining hardware typically averages 3-5 years and must be upgraded regularly to maintain profitability. Additionally, crypto companies are shifting from equity financing to debt financing.Regarding the PP&E expenditures of mining companies in November 2024, Bitfarms signed a miner hosting agreement with Stronghold on November 1, which includes terms for hosting an additional 10,000 Bitcoin mining devices at its facility in Pennsylvania. Around the same time, CleanSpark, a company focused on renewable Bitcoin mining, announced plans to build 400 megawatts of mining infrastructure after acquiring mining company GRIID in October 2024. On November 11, Hive Digital purchased 6,500 application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) for the company's upcoming facility in Paraguay.

Russia's cryptocurrency mining regulations come into effect, establishing strict new rules

ChainCatcher news reports that Russia's comprehensive cryptocurrency mining regulations came into effect on November 1, imposing strict energy limits, mandatory registration, and rigorous oversight to reform the industry. The law officially defines mining as a legal activity in Russia, stipulating safety and operational requirements for miners and creating a framework for trading digital financial assets on specially approved platforms. This framework aims to provide clarity and oversight for Russia's growing cryptocurrency industry, in the face of increasing energy demands and concerns over illegal mining activities.Under the new regulations, only registered organizations and individual entrepreneurs can legally engage in cryptocurrency mining. However, individual Russian citizens who are not formally registered as entrepreneurs can also mine, but with a monthly electricity consumption limit of 6,000 kWh. If they exceed this limit, they will need to register as entrepreneurs to continue their mining activities. This approach ensures that smaller individual mining operations remain viable while imposing stricter requirements on larger, potentially commercial operations.The regulations also establish detailed reporting obligations for miners, requiring them to disclose the total amount of digital currency mined to the Federal Tax Service (FTS) and provide address identifiers for each transaction. This information will be accessible only to law enforcement agencies, ensuring a degree of privacy protection while enabling oversight. Additionally, miners must ensure that their operations meet standards of reliability, safety, and power stability to mitigate risks to the local power grid.

Legal experts: The SEC's lawsuit against Green United mainly targets specific fraudulent activities and will not affect the normal sale of cryptocurrency mining hardware

ChainCatcher news, according to Decrypt, the lawsuit against the cryptocurrency company Green United by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently drawn industry attention. The SEC accuses Green United of defrauding investors of $18 million through the sale of so-called "Green Boxes" mining equipment. Last week, a federal judge dismissed Green United's motion to dismiss, sparking speculation on social media that the sale of cryptocurrency mining hardware could be considered securities. However, several legal experts stated that there is currently no reason for excessive concern.Ishmael Green, a partner at Diaz Reus law firm, pointed out that as long as the mining equipment is sold with the understanding that it will be used for mining by the end user, there should be no issue. "In the Green United case, the sales agreement for the mining equipment states that Green United will control and operate the system, which is the problem." Hadas Jacobi, a consultant at Reed Smith law firm, stated that although the SEC did not explicitly mention hosted mining, it could have implications for hosted mining services. While Green United attempted to portray the case as the SEC misunderstanding hosted mining, the judge denied its motion to dismiss. Currently, the judge has only decided to hear the case and has not ruled on the SEC's arguments.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators