Bitcoin and the US dollar are not even in the same league, just like you can't use a sports car for hauling goods, nor can you use a truck for racing. Today, let's set aside those hype slogans about "disrupting hegemony" and explain this matter from the fundamental logic of economics.

Before the emergence of ENA, stablecoins were either severely centralized or prone to collapse like the algorithmic stablecoin LUNA. You wouldn't imagine that stablecoins could utilize the simple operation of "shorting" to achieve stability, and the results are quite good.

As an L1 public chain token, VIC's market value is only over 70 million dollars, which can be considered a bargain. It is also worth noting that more than half of VIC's tokens have been unlocked, without the excessive selling pressure seen with previous VC tokens. So, is VIC token worth buying? This article will conduct an in-depth analysis based on its fundamentals.

This article proposes a set of criteria for evaluating token models, allowing people to determine which types of token economic models have the potential for long-term sustainable development.

This article will conduct an in-depth analysis of HSK's economic model based on a systematic evaluation standard for token economic models, taking into account the macro background. It will not only focus on superficial information such as distribution mechanisms and supply volume, but will further explore how to assess the deeper merits and demerits of a token economic model.