BTC $62,452.40 -2.35%
ETH $1,783.63 -2.32%
BNB $568.64 -1.54%
XRP $1.06 -2.06%
SOL $75.31 -2.79%
TRX $0.3240 -2.21%
DOGE $0.0721 -1.56%
ADA $0.1580 -2.78%
BCH $236.81 -2.56%
LINK $7.94 -1.64%
HYPE $63.39 -5.94%
AAVE $95.71 -1.13%
SUI $0.7248 -1.72%
XLM $0.1806 -3.40%
ZEC $499.92 -6.41%
BTC $62,452.40 -2.35%
ETH $1,783.63 -2.32%
BNB $568.64 -1.54%
XRP $1.06 -2.06%
SOL $75.31 -2.79%
TRX $0.3240 -2.21%
DOGE $0.0721 -1.56%
ADA $0.1580 -2.78%
BCH $236.81 -2.56%
LINK $7.94 -1.64%
HYPE $63.39 -5.94%
AAVE $95.71 -1.13%
SUI $0.7248 -1.72%
XLM $0.1806 -3.40%
ZEC $499.92 -6.41%

warning

All
Article
Flash

first_img Relay Protocol Warning: The number of honeypot tokens on the Robinhood Chain has surged, and users' funds are immediately drained after purchase

The cross-chain interoperability platform Relay Protocol has issued a warning, stating that since the launch of the Ethereum Layer 2 network Robinhood Chain based on Arbitrum on July 1, a large number of honeypot scam tokens have emerged. After users purchase these tokens, they automatically disappear from their wallets, and the funds cannot be recovered. Relay Protocol clarified that this is not due to a breach of wallet infrastructure; users' private keys and other assets remain secure, and the malicious logic exists only within the scam token contracts themselves.The typical operation of honeypot tokens allows users to buy in but prevents selling through hard-coded rules, or automatically transfers funds to the attacker's wallet. Some users have reported that a certain token contract uses hidden storage mappings to bypass standard ERC-20 security checks to steal assets.Relay Protocol stated that it is blocking discovered scam tokens and verifying safe tokens, advising users to only trade tokens verified by trusted sources, to verify contract addresses before trading, and to test with small amounts of funds first. The platform pointed out that attracting scammers in the early stages of a new chain launch is not an issue unique to Robinhood Chain; similar situations have occurred with other L1 and L2 chains upon their launch.

SpaceX was officially included in the Nasdaq 100 index this week, with historical warnings indicating volatility after the inclusion; TeraWulf's Q1 HPC leasing revenue first exceeded the annual high-margin mining revenue of $630 million

According to BBX data, yesterday marked a milestone for the global largest IPO completion index, with a historic turning point in the valuation logic of AI transformation in mining companies. The core dynamics are as follows:SpaceX, Inc. (NASDAQ: $SPCX) reported on July 7 that the company was officially included in the Nasdaq 100 index this week, becoming the first in history to have the largest single IPO ($75 billion) included in the Nasdaq 100. CoinDesk also issued a historic warning: "The last two largest new constituents added—Palantir ($PLTR) in December 2024 and Strategy ($MSTR) in early 2025—both experienced a phase decline after inclusion, rather than starting a new round of increases"; analysts pointed out that passive funds tracking the Nasdaq 100 complete "forced buying" at the time of inclusion, and if there are no new fundamental catalysts afterward, stock prices often pull back after technical buying subsides. Specific risks currently facing SpaceX include: a net loss of approximately $4.27 billion in Q1 2026 (mainly due to xAI integration expenses), a $2 billion bond issuance plan, and a 3.4% equity dilution from the $60 billion acquisition of Cursor/Anysphere; Morningstar maintains a fair value estimate of $62 per share, indicating about a 70% implied downside from the current market price. For the market holding SpaceX Bitcoin (18,712 coins, approximately $1.2 billion, held in Coinbase Prime), the inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 will trigger a larger scale of SPCX holdings by passive funds, further bridging the gap between traditional index investors and indirect exposure to Bitcoin assets.TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: $WULF) according to the latest analysis, the company's high-performance computing (HPC) leasing revenue in Q1 2026 reached $21 million, accounting for about 62% of the total revenue of $34 million, surpassing Bitcoin mining revenue for the first time—this marks TeraWulf's first historic revenue structure reversal after transitioning to an AI/HPC infrastructure company, with a 117% increase from the $9.7 million HPC revenue in Q4 2025. The company has currently signed over 522 megawatts of AI/HPC leases with Core42 and Fluidstack, with an expected annual high-margin revenue of approximately $630 million; the energy structure consists of nuclear power + hydropower, with an average electricity cost of about $0.035 per kilowatt-hour, one of the lowest among similar mining companies. The company is also developing a new campus in Kentucky, adding approximately 480 megawatts of grid access capacity; analysts have significantly raised their target price ranges, with Keefe Bruyette & Woods raising from $23 to $37, Clear Street from $26 to $38, Jefferies initiating coverage with a Buy rating and a target price of $37, and BTIG raising at the same time. The company's stock price has increased by approximately 88% year-to-date in 2026, leading the gains in the mining sector.

Policy Simulation Report "Europe 2031" Warning: Europe Faces Marginalization Risks in the AI Era

The recently released policy simulation report "Europe 2031" points out that, constrained by a shortage of computing power and reliance on external models, Europe may face the risk of economic and political marginalization in the global AI competition if it does not make significant strategic adjustments. The report notes that Europe currently accounts for only 5% of global AI computing power, lacking leverage in technological competition, and its advocated "technological sovereignty" may be difficult to achieve due to insufficient funding and lagging policies, even facing the risk of losing autonomous control over core technology companies (such as ASML).To address the aforementioned challenges, the report proposes a series of countermeasures. It suggests that Europe should mobilize public and private capital on a large scale, focusing investments on foundational computing infrastructure such as energy, semiconductors, and data centers; and form a technology alliance with countries like the UK and Japan to integrate supply chain advantages for international negotiation leverage. Additionally, the report calls for Europe to advance labor market reforms to adapt to the proliferation of AI and tighten scrutiny of foreign investment in local manufacturing to consolidate its existing advantages in industrial AI and robotics.

The U.S. cryptocurrency market structure bill has entered a critical phase, with NYDIG warning that June to August is the final legislative window

Greg Cipolaro, research director at financial services firm NYDIG, stated that the most realistic window for the U.S. Senate's cryptocurrency market structure bill to pass is from June to early August. If it cannot be advanced during this period, it may face uncertainty for an even longer time after the midterm elections.Previously, White House cryptocurrency advisor Patrick Witt suggested July 4 as an ideal legislative timeline, but NYDIG believes this target is more of an "optimistic expectation," as it needs to go through multiple hurdles such as committee review, full Senate voting, and House processes. The bill aims to clarify the regulatory framework for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. and is seen as one of the most critical pieces of legislation this year, but has been delayed multiple times due to disagreements over stablecoin regulation, ethical provisions, and DeFi rules.The Senate Banking Committee has advanced the relevant draft to a full Senate vote, but it still requires at least 60 votes to pass. Analysts point out that if the bill does not pass before the election cycle, changes in Senate control between Republicans and Democrats may further reduce legislative certainty, keeping the industry in a "regulatory gray area." However, once the bill is finally passed and signed into law, it will bring regulatory clarity to the market, especially as Bitcoin is expected to be clearly classified as a commodity, thereby reducing uncertainty for institutional entry.

US OFAC Warning: Paying Iran the "Strait of Hormuz Transit Fee" through digital assets and other forms carries sanctions risks

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has noted Iran's threats to shipping and its demands for "tolls" to ensure safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz. These demands may include various payment methods, such as fiat currency, digital assets, offset arrangements, informal swaps, or other physical forms of payment, such as nominal charitable donations to the Iranian Red Crescent Society, the Bonyad Mostazafan Foundation, or accounts of Iranian embassies.OFAC issued this warning to remind U.S. and non-U.S. entities that making payments to the Iranian regime or seeking passage guarantees carries sanctions risks, regardless of the payment method. Under U.S. sanctions regulations, U.S. entities and their foreign entities that are owned or controlled are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with the Iranian government, including providing or receiving services, unless exempted or authorized. Additionally, U.S. entities are also prohibited from engaging in transactions with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which is listed on multiple sanctions lists and designated as a foreign terrorist organization.U.S. entities are also generally prohibited from trading with Iranian digital asset trading platforms, which are considered sanctioned Iranian financial institutions. Furthermore, non-U.S. entities that engage in unauthorized transactions with the Iranian government or IRGC may also face sanctions risks, including "secondary sanctions" on relevant financial institutions, restricting their access to the U.S. financial system. Conducting business with sanctioned Iranian digital asset trading platforms may also be viewed as supporting Iran's sanctioned financial system and could lead to sanctions. If relevant transactions result in U.S. entities (such as insurance companies, reinsurance firms, or financial institutions) violating sanctions regulations, non-U.S. entities may also face civil or criminal liability.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.