A man was sentenced to thirteen years and six months in prison for defrauding more than 700,000 people out of over 160 million yuan by forging virtual currency
ChainCatcher news reports that recently, the People's Procuratorate of Huqiu District, Suzhou City, handled a virtual currency fraud case involving over 700,000 victims nationwide, with the amount involved reaching as high as 160 million yuan. After deducting costs for promotional products, referral rebates, and other expenses totaling over 97 million yuan, the suspect, Fang, actually profited about 69 million yuan.It is reported that the fraud project is named "Global Coin," falsely claiming that this virtual currency was launched by a certain group in Hong Kong using the latest blockchain technology, and could be exchanged for RMB at a certain ratio once listed. Among them, the "membership model" is the "key to success," where only by becoming a higher-level member can one possess more Global Coins and larger-capacity mining machines to produce Global Coins. At the same time, members can develop downlines to earn rebates.During the review and prosecution stage, Fang and his defense lawyer argued that his actions were mainly for selling goods, and the fees for membership upgrades were in exchange for products such as rice and cooking oil, while Global Coins and mining machines were merely complimentary "game props." The People's Procuratorate of Huqiu District, Suzhou City, after review, believed that the suspect Fang fabricated the claim that Global Coins could be traded on the market, deceiving victims into spending money to upgrade their membership to obtain Global Coins, leading victims to mistakenly believe they could profit from the trading of Global Coins, thus disposing of their property and incurring losses, which meets the elements of the crime of fraud. Regarding the paid gifts of oil, rice, and other items, from the perspective of the transaction purpose, the victims' purpose in disposing of their property was to obtain Global Coins, not to purchase the aforementioned items. From the payment process, the victims decided to upgrade their membership based on the defendant's deception, and only after deciding to upgrade did the interface for selecting gifts pop up. The payment amount was unrelated to the selected products, and there was no prior negotiation or pricing regarding the purchase of goods, which does not conform to the characteristics of commodity transactions. In summary, it should be classified as fraud.After the incident, the police promptly froze over 50 million yuan in Fang's account, and the ten properties he purchased with these illegal gains were also sealed by the public security authorities. Recently, the court sentenced Fang to thirteen years and six months in prison for fraud and imposed a fine of three million yuan. Currently, the public security, prosecution, and judiciary have established a property disposal team, and the refund work is being carried out in an orderly manner.