Vitalik: Setting up MEV multi-proposers may lead to chain spam issues and bring more negative externalities
ChainCatcher news, SMG research director Max Resnick posted on social media: "MEV is fundamentally about control. Proposers can control which transactions are included in a block and the order in which they are included. In other words, MEV is about censorship and reordering. The good news is that solving this problem is possible.The first step is to address censorship resistance by establishing multiple parallel proposers; the second step is to tackle the reordering issue. Once there is a multi-proposer architecture, proposers can reach consensus on a set of unordered transactions, and the execution layer is responsible for sorting them using deterministic rules."In response, Vitalik Buterin stated: "Doesn't this lead to people flooding the chain with transactions to collect MEV, thereby maximizing their chances of being first? So you would still get 'MEV auctions', but with more negative externalities at the protocol level.We saw this during the ICO era in 2017 when some projects tried to ban transactions with gas fees above 50, resulting in a lot of on-chain spam."