rules

Michael Saylor: The accounting rules coming into effect next year may enable MicroStrategy to meet the S&P 500 earnings requirements

ChainCatcher news, according to Barrons, MicroStrategy Chairman Michael Saylor did not explicitly state whether the company might be included in the S&P 500 during a recent interview, but he mentioned that, given the optimistic outlook on Bitcoin, MicroStrategy could report billions of dollars in quarterly net income next year due to the increase in the value of its Bitcoin holdings. The accounting rule changes set to take effect in 2025 may allow MicroStrategy to meet the profitability requirements for joining the S&P 500.It is reported that MicroStrategy's traditional software business (its main business before it began acquiring Bitcoin in large quantities in 2020) is relatively small, with a valuation of only about $1 billion. Additionally, this business is currently operating at a loss according to GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), making it difficult to meet the inclusion requirements for the S&P 500 index based solely on this. The upcoming accounting rules will adjust the company's Bitcoin holdings from their current undervalued state to fair market value, potentially leading to significant net income growth when Bitcoin prices rise. However, the S&P Global Index Committee decides on S&P 500 index members by invitation, reviewing profitability, market capitalization, and other factors.

Texas court rules SEC's expanded definition of "dealer" is illegal, impacting the crypto finance sector

ChainCatcher news, a Texas court has ordered the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to repeal a controversial rule that broadly redefined the term "Dealer," a move that has impacted both cryptocurrency-focused financial firms and traditional financial companies.Judge Reed O'Connor found that the rule was passed in February by a 3 to 2 vote, exceeding the statutory authority of the SEC. Traditionally, a dealer refers to an entity that buys and sells securities for itself rather than for others. The SEC expanded the definition in an attempt to include any entity capable of providing market liquidity, particularly in the U.S. Treasury market.In a footnote of the original proposal draft, it was explicitly stated that those "engaged in the trading of crypto securities" must comply with securities laws, register with the SEC, and join industry-supported self-regulatory organizations. Initially, participants in the crypto industry objected to the rule. The expanded interpretation effectively eliminated the distinction between "trader" and "dealer" in traditional understanding.The Texas Blockchain Association and the Crypto Freedom Alliance filed a lawsuit against the securities regulator in April (the month the rule officially took effect), claiming that the rule's intervention in the crypto space was excessive and conflicted with existing laws regulating securities dealers, which have been in place for 90 years.

Hunan court rules that the virtual currency "mining machine" trading contract is invalid, and the related losses shall be borne by both parties

ChainCatcher news, according to Hong Wang reports, the People's Court of Jiahe County, Hunan Province recently made a ruling on a major dispute over a mining machine transaction. The case shows that the plaintiff, Pan Mouxiang, communicated with the defendant, Lei Moucai, via WeChat in November 2021 to purchase Bitcoin mining machines S19XP. After paying 23.678 million USDT, the two parties had a disagreement over the nature of the contract and the settlement price. The plaintiff requested the defendant to return the price difference of 6.27 million USDT and continue to deliver 149 mining machines.The court ruled to dismiss all of the plaintiff's claims based on two main reasons: first, according to the central bank and other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks of Virtual Currency Trading and Speculation," USDT and other virtual currencies do not have the status of legal tender, and related transactions are considered illegal financial activities.Secondly, based on the National Development and Reform Commission's "Notice on Rectifying Virtual Currency 'Mining' Activities," the energy consumption of mining activities is high, carbon emissions are significant, and economic contributions are low, which does not align with the national green development strategy. The court determined that the transaction contract was invalid due to violations of laws and regulations as well as public order and good customs, and the related losses would be borne by both parties.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators