monetary system

Bank for International Settlements: Stablecoins have not passed the "three key tests" and are unlikely to become the core of the future monetary system

ChainCatcher news, according to The Block, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) stated in a report released on Tuesday that stablecoins do not qualify as money. The institution, known as the "central bank of central banks," pointed out in the report that digital assets pegged to fiat currencies failed to meet the "three key tests" required to constitute the core of a monetary system: singleness, elasticity, and integrity.The authors of the report wrote in this annual publication, "It remains to be seen what role stablecoins will play in the future monetary system." The report focuses on the next generation of financial systems. "However, stablecoins perform poorly in the three core characteristics necessary for building a sound monetary system, and therefore cannot serve as a pillar of the future monetary system." Nevertheless, the report also acknowledges that stablecoins have certain advantages, such as programmability, pseudonymity, and providing convenient access for new users.Additionally, from a technical perspective, they have the potential to offer lower costs and faster transaction speeds in cross-border payments. However, the authors also pointed out that compared to currencies issued by central banks and instruments issued by commercial banks and other private entities, stablecoins may pose systemic risks, such as undermining government monetary sovereignty (sometimes achieved through "implicit dollarization") and facilitating illegal activities. Although stablecoins play a clear role as channels for funds in and out of the crypto ecosystem and are widely used in countries with high inflation, strict capital controls, or limited access to dollar accounts, the BIS stated that these assets should not be viewed as "cash."
2025-06-25

Ethereum core developer: Often doubts whether they chose the wrong industry

ChainCatcher message, Ethereum Foundation member and Geth development lead Péter Szilágyi posted on social media, "I often wonder if I chose the wrong industry.For example, SpaceX, they send rockets to Mars? Human progress. They fail to launch a rocket and it explodes? Humanity learns lessons and still progresses. All outcomes bring progress.In contrast, the crypto industry is simply a casino for fools (apologies to the few exceptions). Prices go up? Great, when to buy a sports car. Prices go down? Life is destroyed. What contribution does this make to humanity?Yes, building a new monetary system does take time. Of course... but in the process, can we do something useful? Everyone wants to be the next Vitalik, no one wants to build something useful, everyone is just thinking about how to extract value.I really don't see why this system shouldn't collapse? From a macro perspective, what will we lose? Everything the crypto industry has done so far is just a massive transfer of value, and I haven't seen any substantial value creation.Please note, getting rich through luck and then transferring funds to some non-crypto projects cannot be considered a success story for crypto. At best, it's just a lucky philanthropist's success story, more likely just a simple diversification of investments by one person.In my opinion, this industry should have started creating something truly useful that people are willing to use, otherwise it should just close its doors.At least Bitcoin tried (though it failed) to become a safe-haven asset. But the others are just selling shovels, with no signs of a gold rush at all."
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators