funds

Sun Yuchen released the "Seven Deadly Sins" of FDT, including violation of fiduciary duty, abuse of client funds, and more

ChainCatcher message, Sun Yuchen published the "Seven Deadly Sins" of First Digital Trust (FDT) on social media, including: violation of fiduciary duty, misuse of client funds, unlicensed investment activities, fraud or theft, false reporting or concealment of information, violation of anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, violation of Hong Kong POBO regulations. The details are as follows:Crime 1: Violation of Fiduciary DutyAccording to the Hong Kong Trust Ordinance (Chapter 29), trustees must act with care, diligence, and loyalty. Misappropriation of client funds violates Section 4 (reasonable care obligation) and the principles of trust. Clearly, FDT will bear liability for compensation and damages in civil litigation.Crime 2: Misuse of Client FundsThe Securities and Futures (Client Money) Rules (Chapter 571) stipulate that custodial funds must not be used for the custodian's own purposes. Client assets must be held in segregated accounts, and unauthorized withdrawals are strictly prohibited. By transferring TUSD funds to ARIA DMCC without proper authorization, FDT faces enforcement actions, including fines, revocation of licenses, or criminal prosecution.Crime 3: Unlicensed Investment ActivitiesAlthough FDT is registered as a Trust or Company Service Provider (TCSP), it has no SFC license to conduct regulated activities on behalf of clients. Its so-called investment activities involving TUSD assets at ARIA directly violate the provisions of the Securities and Futures Ordinance, which prohibits engaging in regulated activities without a license.Crime 4: Fraud or TheftMisappropriation of funds with the intent to deceive clients constitutes fraud or theft. FDT conspired with accomplices (such as Aria CFF, Truecoin (Alex De Lorraine), Crossbridge/Finaport (Yai Sukonthabhund)) to cover up the misappropriation by falsifying records and claiming to have made false investments.Crime 5: False Reporting or Concealment of InformationTo cover up misappropriation or unauthorized transactions, FDT provided false statements and fraudulent documents, claiming that TUSD funds were intact and invested as instructed. This violates Section 300 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (using fraudulent or deceptive means in securities transactions).Crime 6: Violation of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) RegulationsBy transferring misappropriated funds through complex transactions or offshore accounts to conceal their source, FDT facilitated and/or constituted a violation of anti-money laundering regulations.Crime 7: Prevention of Bribery Ordinance (POBO)The Prevention of Bribery Ordinance is the primary legislation in Hong Kong governing secret commissions. It criminalizes corrupt transactions, including agents receiving undisclosed benefits or commissions without the principal's consent. FDT/Legacy, under the direction of Vincent Chok, received secret kickbacks from DMCC in exchange for the illegal transfer of TUSD custodial funds.

Sun Yuchen: Both FDT and FTX are incidents of misappropriating user funds, but the FDT incident is more severe

ChainCatcher news, Sun Yuchen posted on platform X stating that the theft of user funds by First Digital Trust (FDT) and the misappropriation of user funds by FTX are both very serious and malicious incidents of misappropriation of user funds. However, if one must compare the severity, the severity of First Digital Trust (FDT) is even more serious, more than ten times worse than FTX. The reasons are as follows:FTX misappropriated user funds. Although users were unaware of the misappropriation, at least internally within FTX, SBF made it appear as if there was a pledge loan, representing Alameda Research, pledging a large amount of FTT/SRM/FTX shares/Maps tokens to lend user funds. At least on the surface, this looked like a loan, and a certain degree of collateral was provided based on a percentage. In contrast, FDT directly misappropriated and stole assets without user authorization and without users being aware, without even the internal collateral process.SBF misappropriated user funds from FTX without user authorization, but ultimately used them for investments, with at least the vast majority going into high-quality companies such as Robinhood and AI companies like Anthropic, without engaging in embezzlement or indulgence. In comparison, FDT currently appears to have diverted the vast majority into private companies, completely misappropriated and embezzled, without making any substantial investments.After the incident was exposed, SBF's attitude was at least proactive; he actively sought remedies, hiring law firms to find ways to recover user assets. In contrast, Vincent Chok Zhuo Junqiang, after the facts of misappropriation were exposed, still insisted on denying the truth, pretending that nothing had happened, showing great subjective malice.After the FTX incident, U.S. regulatory agencies and law enforcement quickly took action, actively intervening in the FTX bankruptcy proceedings and arresting those involved with FTX (including SBF), actively controlling the situation, helping users mitigate losses, and avoiding a significant impact on the reputation of the U.S. financial system.

First Digital: did not participate in coordinating the plan or misappropriating funds, executing transactions according to the instructions of Techteryx and its authorized representatives

ChainCatcher message, First Digital issued an official statement on social media: "Today, Justin Sun's accusations against FDT at the press conference are unfounded. We firmly deny any claims regarding FDT's alleged involvement in coordinating plans or misappropriating funds. We want to emphasize that these accusations are completely baseless and factually incorrect.FDT acts solely as an intermediary, executing transactions at the direction of Techteryx and its authorized representatives. FDT has not, and is not obligated to, independently assess or advise on Techteryx's investments. We have never moved or invested funds without explicit written instructions from Techteryx or its authorized representatives. All reserve assets are deployed strictly according to the written instructions provided by Techteryx and its authorized representatives at the time. We have records of all written instructions as evidence.Regarding Techteryx's request for fund redemption, ARIA has expressed its anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) concerns regarding the acquisition transaction between TrueCoin and Techteryx, as well as the identity of Techteryx's ultimate beneficial owners. As of today, Techteryx has refused to provide the information requested by ARIA.We reiterate that FDT remains fully solvent, with each FDUSD fully backed by cash and cash equivalents at a 1:1 ratio. The exact ISIN numbers of all reserve assets supporting FDUSD are clearly listed in our certification report and are available for public verification. We are processing redemption requests as usual. We are seeking legal advice, and FDT will take legal action to protect its rights and reputation."
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators