control

Bitget integrates Fireblocks Off Exchange, allowing institutional users to trade through on-chain MPC shared wallets without transferring assets, while retaining full control over their assets and fully accessing Bitget's liquidity and execution environment.Bitget CEO Gracy Chen stated that for institutions, the way funds are deployed is equally important. This integration further enhances Bitget's institutional service capabilities under the UEX framework, bringing together trade execution, fund management, and risk control into a unified operational environment.Richard Astle, Vice President of the Fireblocks Network, pointed out that the separation of custody and execution is becoming the benchmark expectation for institutions participating in the digital asset market. This collaboration effectively reduces institutional clients' risk exposure by enhancing transparency, providing a more flexible and secure participation model for institutional-level funds.

According to Bitcoin.com, the Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) recently released a new version of the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulatory guidelines, requiring cryptocurrency businesses operating in Dubai to incorporate real-time data on high-risk and blacklist countries from the FATF into their risk scoring models, replacing the previous static compliance tracking mechanism.The new regulations require businesses to update their risk assessments at least every three months, and any significant changes in operational structure or product lines must be updated immediately; at the same time, the risks of diffusion financing and targeted financial sanctions must be assessed separately and not be merged with general anti-money laundering compliance; in addition, businesses must formally document the risks associated with AI-assisted operations and anonymous-enhanced exchanges.VARA stated that compliance officers, senior management, and board members must take full responsibility for the company's residual risk ratings, and the regulatory focus has shifted from post-event penalties to proactive systemic risk management.

According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, within 2 days, the SIREN controllers have essentially "broken down" 680 million SIREN (accounting for 94% of the total). This sell-off of SIREN led to a price drop of 96% (from $1.3 to $0.05), resulting in approximately 64.8 million USDT. About 200 million of these flowed into centralized exchanges such as Binance, Gate, and KuCoin, with most being bought in small amounts on-chain by hundreds of addresses after the price fell below $0.1. These small purchases are likely still orchestrated by the controllers, aiming to recover chips at low prices, increase tracking difficulty, and prepare for the next manipulation.

The Aztec Foundation stated on platform X that it has been informed of a potential vulnerability attack that occurred earlier with Aztec Connect. This product is not associated with the smart contracts related to the AZTEC ERC20 token and the current Aztec network. Aztec Connect was deprecated three years ago, and Aztec Labs no longer retains any control over the system, making it unable to pause or upgrade it. According to previous reports, the Aztec Router contract is suspected to have been attacked, with approximately $2.19 million in assets being transferred out.

According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, as the SIREN controllers continue to sell on-chain, the price of SIREN has dropped to $0.06, a decrease of 95% compared to the high of $1.3 a week ago.From the on-chain perspective, they sold 360 million SIREN in a day and a half, exchanging it for about 48.7 million USDT. Currently, on-chain addresses still hold about 319 million SIREN (44% of the total supply).

According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, the suspected controlling address of SIREN has continuously reduced its holdings on a large scale in the past 14 hours, cumulatively selling approximately 201 million SIREN and cashing out about 27.7 million USDT, most of which has been transferred to centralized exchanges.

David Sacks, the head of AI and crypto affairs at the White House, stated that although the commercial version of the Mythos series model Fable released by Anthropic this week includes safety barriers, once those barriers are bypassed, users will be able to access Mythos's advanced cyber attack capabilities. Sacks pointed out that Anthropic had previously described Mythos as a "cyber weapon" that requires regulation, so fixing the related vulnerabilities should have been its responsibility.Sacks mentioned that a partner trusted by both Anthropic and the U.S. government discovered a jailbreak method to bypass the safety barriers while testing Fable. The U.S. government subsequently requested Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei to fix the vulnerabilities or take the model offline, but this request was refused. Anthropic stated in a declaration that the vulnerability is "not serious," a claim that contradicts the judgment of the U.S. government and relevant partners.Sacks stated that Anthropic has always emphasized that safety should be prioritized, but this time it prioritized maintaining consumer-grade model services. In response, the U.S. government reluctantly imposed export control measures on Anthropic and hopes that Anthropic will resolve the safety issues as soon as possible to lift the related restrictions and restore the full release of Fable.Sacks also denied that this action is related to previous disputes between the U.S. Department of Defense and Anthropic, stating that the government recognizes Anthropic's technological capabilities and believes that the current issues can be resolved relatively easily, with the initiative currently in Anthropic's hands.

According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, since 10 AM today, the SIREN controller has cumulatively sold approximately 118 million SIREN, exchanging it for 18 million USDT, resulting in a significant drop in the SIREN price.Market data shows that SIREN is currently priced at $0.132, with a 24-hour decline of 73.39%.

According to an official statement from Anthropic, on June 11 local time, the U.S. government issued an export control directive citing national security, requiring the suspension of access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all foreign nationals. Anthropic was forced to shut down the aforementioned two models for all users.The government believes it has discovered a "jailbreak" method to bypass the protective mechanisms of Fable 5, but Anthropic, after review, pointed out that the related vulnerability is relatively minor and that similar capabilities exist in other publicly available models such as OpenAI GPT-5.5, which does not constitute an exclusive risk to Mythos.Anthropic stated that it will comply with the government directive but clearly opposes taking down commercial models that have been deployed to hundreds of millions of users based on the discovery of a single narrow-range jailbreak. They warned that if this standard is widely applied in the industry, it would effectively block all new deployments of cutting-edge models. The company is currently actively communicating with the government to restore access as soon as possible.

Despite Elon Musk selling a portion of his shares through the IPO, he has not relinquished control over SpaceX. According to the company's prospectus, after the completion of the IPO, Musk will still hold 82.4% of the combined voting power of SpaceX, maintaining absolute dominance over significant company matters.SpaceX employs a dual-class share structure, where Class B shares have 10 votes per share, while Class A shares have only 1 vote per share. After the IPO, Musk will still hold the vast majority of Class B high-vote shares, thereby maintaining overwhelming control in board elections, merger transactions, and other major corporate decisions. Unlike many tech companies that see control gradually dispersed after going public, SpaceX will remain a publicly traded company that is highly controlled by Musk.

According to CoinDesk, an address from the "Satoshi era" that has never been used since March 2011, holding 35.55 bitcoins (approximately $2.54 million), made a transfer this week, which is seen as one of the first publicly visible responses from defendants in a lawsuit involving approximately 3.8 million bitcoins (valued at about $285 billion) in New York.On-chain data shows that the address transferred 15 BTC to a new address on June 2, keeping the remaining 20.55 BTC as change. The address initially received bitcoins on March 27, 2011, when the price of BTC was less than $1.In March of this year, a plaintiff using the pseudonym "Noah Doe" filed a lawsuit in New York state court alongside two LLCs from Wyoming, attempting to claim ownership of approximately 3.8 million long-dormant bitcoin wallets under New York's lost property law, positioning themselves as the "discoverer." The court approved sending on-chain notifications to the relevant wallets via the bitcoin OP_RETURN field.In July 2025, the advisory firm Salomon Brothers Strategic Advisors sent dust transactions with links to legal notices to 39,000 wallets, including the aforementioned address, requesting holders to prove ownership within 90 days.Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Research, pointed out that the address corresponds to defendant number 38215 in the case, stating, "Clearly, these bitcoins have not actually been abandoned."Additionally, another address that had been dormant for 15 years, 1CDSyXAQxro4FPUoqAQb81642ruqDsUiNp, also transferred 20 BTC (approximately $1.48 million) on the same day, but this address did not appear on Noah Doe's list of lawsuits.Analysis suggests that the on-chain movements mentioned above indicate that some bitcoins from the Satoshi era, considered "abandoned assets," are actually still under the control of the original holders.

According to IOL, the High Court of Gauteng Province in South Africa ruled that Bitcoin falls under "capital" and "currency" within the South African foreign exchange control system, and ordered the confiscation of nearly 6 million rand worth of Bitcoin assets. The court determined that a trader transferred nearly 1,680 Bitcoins to a wallet accessible only through an overseas registered cryptocurrency exchange via their Luno account between January 2018 and March 2020, which amounted to exporting capital abroad without approval from the Treasury, violating foreign exchange control regulations.Meanwhile, the South African Treasury released a draft consultation on capital flow management for 2026 last month, aimed at modernizing the management of cross-border capital flows by reducing pre-approval for transactions, strengthening reporting, and monitoring high-impact, high-risk cross-border transactions.

According to CoinDesk, Tom Lee, Head of Research at Fundstrat and Chairman of Bitmine, stated at the Proof of Talk conference in Paris that he expects Ethereum to eventually reach $250,000, with artificial intelligence and tokenization driving significant changes in financial infrastructure. Lee pointed out that with the arrival of the machine-to-machine economy, Ethereum will transition from a speculative digital asset to a major global currency for payment automation and computational processing power.Bitmine recently acquired 111,942 ETH, increasing its holdings to nearly 5.4 million ETH, accounting for about 4.47% of the circulating supply. Lee stated that Bitmine is now eligible for inclusion in the Russell 1000 index, with its staking model outperforming holding spot ETH. He believes that enterprise validators will replace the shrinking Ethereum Foundation as key managers of the network, with corporate entities currently jointly controlling 7% of Ethereum's circulating supply.Lee mentioned that if Ethereum achieves the $250,000 target, Bitmine's stock price will reach $5,000. He also noted that the current bearish sentiment indicates the market bottom for Bitcoin and Ethereum, suggesting that selling during bearish times is akin to selling at the bottom.

According to SlowMist monitoring, the ONTR token contract has an access control vulnerability due to the onlyOwner modifier, resulting in a loss of 49.4801 WETH, worth approximately $98,000. The attacker (0xe806...b760) exploited this vulnerability by calling transferOwnership() to set the attacker contract as the owner when the owner was address(0) through permission checks, then called desertJasper() to add hidden balances to the queue, and subsequently called glenFlash() to execute ashBud(), directly increasing the address balance by 1e30 basic units without increasing the totalSupply. The attacker transferred the inflated tokens to PancakePair (0xd46d...83fd) and exchanged them for WETH through swap().

According to Cryptopolitan, the Digital Asset Exchange Alliance (DAXA) in South Korea has introduced new compliance standards requiring exchanges to revoke API keys suspected of being improperly shared among users. The new regulations aim to combat market manipulation, false orders, and other behaviors that exploit shared or leaked API credentials.According to the new guidelines, DAXA member exchanges will take strict measures when suspicious API sharing behavior is detected. After enhanced monitoring and user warnings, users will be required to undergo mandatory re-authentication. Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax are all regulated by DAXA, and these exchanges will also implement an IP whitelist system to restrict API access only from approved addresses. The Financial Supervisory Service of Korea stated that automated trading currently accounts for about 30% of domestic cryptocurrency trading volume.

The European Central Bank (ECB) rejected the proposal to relax regulations on euro stablecoins, believing that such measures are too risky and could undermine financial stability and the transmission of monetary policy.Bruegel suggested at the informal meeting of EU finance ministers held in Nicosia, Cyprus, that liquidity requirements for stablecoin issuers should be lowered and that they should be allowed to access ECB funding support when necessary to combat a market dominated by dollar stablecoins and to avoid "digital dollarization." However, officials, including central bank president Lagarde, strongly opposed this, arguing that stablecoins could destabilize bank deposits, increase banks' funding costs, weaken lending capacity, and interfere with interest rate control.Although some finance ministers had mixed feelings about the proposal, several central bank officials questioned the idea of making the ECB the "lender of last resort" for stablecoin issuers. The EU is currently implementing strict regulations on stablecoins under the MiCAR framework, while the GENIUS Act passed in the U.S. in 2025 adopts more lenient rules. Currently, euro stablecoins account for only 0.3% of the global stablecoin supply, while Europe is advancing the digital euro project to enhance payment sovereignty.

According to a report by Reuters, the European Central Bank opposed the proposal to promote more euro stablecoins at the EU finance ministers' meeting, arguing that relaxing liquidity requirements for stablecoin issuers, or even allowing them access to financing from the European Central Bank, could undermine the stability of bank deposits, suppress bank lending, and increase the difficulty of interest rate regulation.The proposal was put forward by Bruegel in the meeting documents, aiming to expand the market currently dominated by dollar stablecoins. European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde has previously expressed a cautious attitude towards euro stablecoins and has shown more support for tokenized commercial bank deposit schemes.The report also stated that the EU is reviewing the MiCA, which will take effect in 2024, while the U.S. will pass the more lenient GENIUS Act in 2025.

According to Jinshi reports, Federal Reserve official Barkin stated that there are currently no signs of runaway inflation based on the inflation expectations reflected in the long-term bond market.

Arkham issued a warning regarding the token concentration of the $4 billion market cap crypto project LAB. According to on-chain analysis posted on X, a single entity may control over 90% of the token's supply, with on-chain analyst ZachXBT noting that the internal holding ratio could be as high as 95%.

On-chain detective ZachXBT has released a lengthy article exposing the LAB project and its founder (@vsadkovv), accusing the LAB token's circulation and distribution of being very opaque.ZachXBT stated that Coingecko, RootData, and CMC all reported different circulation figures for LAB, and the official team has not clearly disclosed the token distribution. There is a significant overlap between investors and trading platforms, and most critically: insiders likely control over 95% of the tokens, leaving retail investors completely unaware of the true circulation situation.Additionally, the LAB team unilaterally changed the public sale lock-up period from 3 months to 9 months, while also defaulting on marketing fees, providing special treatment to KOLs and whales, and requiring them to post promotional content. The founder has mixed project funds with personal accounts, with a large amount of funds going directly into trading platform recharge addresses. Insiders can sell off tokens without retail investors being aware at all. ZachXBT calls for trading platforms to conduct a thorough investigation and delist or freeze the related funds.