bybit

Bybit CEO responds to OIK dumping allegations: will not sell off activity budget for profit, accepts audits from any regulatory authority

ChainCatcher news, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou responded to the concerns regarding the Launchpool project OIK token dump: "The budget for OIK's launchpool activity was a total of 10 million tokens provided by the project party, of which 3.3 million have been distributed, with over 90,000 users participating in the activity. The launchpool is still ongoing and will conclude on March 19, with 5.7 million tokens yet to be distributed.Bybit has never sold off activity budgets for profit; such market manipulation has serious legal consequences, and the budget is all in hot wallets, which can be audited by any regulatory authority. Currently, it appears that there are indeed large holders selling OIK in the market, and the compliance department is investigating the specific details. In the future, we are considering allowing the community to have a more direct view of our budget situation by using independent wallets to receive project budgets, enabling the community to see everything transparently."It is reported that previously some community users raised concerns: "It is inferred that Bybit is using its own Launchpool as a cash machine. The TGE of SpaceNation, which has been built for a year, was a failure. However, over the past three days, the community has gone from outrage to resentment to questioning and investigation, and has collected some evidence. A community sold less than 5% of the project, yet the project party absorbed an abnormal circulation volume within 30 minutes of the opening."

Bybit proposes to request the ParaSwap DAO to return the fees obtained from the hacker exchange

ChainCatcher news, according to Cointelegraph, the cryptocurrency exchange Bybit has confirmed that it has initiated a proposal requesting the decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol ParaSwap to return the transaction fees generated from trading with digital assets stolen from the exchange by the Lazarus hacker group.On March 4, a proposal was published on the ParaSwap decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) forum, requesting the freezing and return of 44.67 wETH worth nearly $100,000. The proposal initially raised skepticism, with several DAO members demanding verification of its origin. Bybit posted a verification message on its official X account on March 5, confirming that the proposal was initiated by them.This proposal for fund return sparked intense discussions among DAO members. DeFi researcher and ParaSwap DAO representative Ignas pointed out that profiting from a hacker attack gives a "bad image" to the DAO, and returning the funds would demonstrate support for industry peers. He added that retaining these funds could attract regulatory scrutiny and legal troubles. However, he also warned that refunds would set a dangerous precedent for DeFi: "Code is law. The DAO legally earned the fees through smart contracts. If we return the funds now, what happens in similar situations in the future? This would set a dangerous precedent."Opinions among ParaSwap DAO members are divided, with some supporting conditional refunds of the fees, while others voted against the refund. DAO member SEED Gov proposed three possible courses of action: full refund, rejection of the request, or negotiating a structured refund that includes retaining 10% as a bounty, consistent with Bybit's existing bug bounty program.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators