uniswap

An MEV bot named Yoink on Ethereum front-ran an exploit attack targeting the Safe wallet, which PeckShield referred to as an approximately $7.81 million rsETH attack. On-chain records show that the Yoink transaction received 2,900 rsETH and sent 2,882.37 rsETH to the address 0xC70f00CD7E461686b04B0E912E309becA8b80ea0, which currently has a balance of 2,882.36740883 rsETH.The same transaction also sent 17.63 rsETH to the Uniswap v4 Pool Manager, which sent 18.95 ETH to the Yoink contract, which then transferred 18.93 ETH to the block builder. The Yoink transaction and the original attack transaction both occurred in Ethereum block 25980525, with the Yoink transaction at the top of the block, and the original transaction executed a rollback, consistent with the front-running judgment of security researchers.BlockSec attributed the vulnerability to a flaw in the authorization checks of the executor contract associated with the enabled Safe module, allowing calls controlled by the attacker to be executed through a trusted executor. Blockaid stated that the attacker exploited a public keeper multi-call to direct a custom Uniswap v4 liquidity module to a hook pool created by the attacker, which subsequently unpacked aEthrsETH into rsETH.

In response to the rumors of the "death" of Robinhood Chain in the community, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams stated that it is quite ridiculous to claim that Robinhood Chain "has died" based solely on the fee income chart. In fact, Robinhood has only raised the gas limit and lowered user fees to expand on-chain capacity and meet the huge demand for block space. Approximately 95% of the DEX trading volume on Robinhood Chain comes from Uniswap, and its overall performance is currently good.Dragonfly managing partner Haseeb also previously stated that after Robinhood Chain reduced fees, on-chain revenue significantly decreased, but DEX trading volume remains strong, currently second only to Solana. This strategy is clearly intentional; Robinhood values attracting RWA and on-chain financial activities through low fees and higher capacity rather than optimizing short-term orderer revenue.

The Robinhood chain ecosystem token STANDARD (The Standard Reserve) reached a market value of 40 million USD two hours after its launch, then fell back, currently reported at 28.91 million USD, with a trading volume exceeding 40 million USD. The current circulating supply of the on-chain STANDARD token is 98,323,639.9815 tokens.The project aims to become an on-chain sovereign central bank, attempting to replace traditional central banks or DAO governance with immutable smart contract code (about 4,000 lines) to achieve automatic monetary policy. The protocol automatically adjusts monetary policy through the net flow of ETH in the official trading pool of Uniswap v4: when there is a net inflow of funds, it gradually expands the issuance of STANDARD and uses the income to accumulate reserve assets and the protocol's own liquidity; when there is a net outflow of funds, it reduces the issuance and uses the income to buy back and destroy tokens.The official white paper shows that STANDARD, as the only token in the ecosystem, has a hard cap of 1 billion tokens. At the genesis, only 100 million tokens were pre-mined, and all were locked as the protocol's own liquidity in the ETH--STANDARD pool on Uniswap v4. The remaining 900 million tokens are the issuance budget, and once the cumulative issuance is exhausted, the basic issuance will permanently stop. The trading fee distribution plan is: 70% goes to the reserve/buyback pool, 15% for permanent liquidity, and 15% allocated to the team. The current basic issuance of the protocol starts at 700,000 tokens per day and adjusts the policy multiplier m based on the inflow of ETH (ranging from 0.2 times to 1.25 times, starting at 1 time).

Decentralized Trading Infrastructure 0x stated that this year it has routed 81.92 million transactions with a trading volume of 4.267 billion USD, with approximately 70% touching Uniswap liquidity. 0x indicated that there has been an increase in malicious Uniswap v4 hooks recently, which provide one price in quote requests and another price at settlement, profiting from users by deceiving aggregators, wallets, and trading applications.After analyzing 84,163 hooks across 6 chains, 0x reported that only 19.4% are safe, 54.2% are malicious, and 26.4% may be malicious. Transactions routed through malicious v4 hooks can result in actual amounts received being up to 50% less than the quoted price. The article cites examples where the Base chain ETH/NVDAc pool hooks have accumulated fees of approximately 143,000 USD, and the BNB chain USDT/WBNB pool hooks have accumulated about 18,600 USD.0x stated that routing parties must ensure that the quoted amounts in pools are consistent with actual execution behavior, applications must have the capability to quickly eliminate suspicious routes, and users should be aware that optimal quotes are only useful when the route is safe. 0x has implemented measures such as detection and pool audits to prevent such pools from appearing in routing.

The on-chain central bank project The Standard Reserve announced on X that the project will launch on September 14. The project was initiated by developer 0xBeans and released its white paper on August 23, positioning itself as a revised version of Olympus DAO (OHM), with plans to launch on the Robinhood Chain. Currently, the project is in the audit and whitelist allocation phase, and there are no tokens or NFTs available for trading.In terms of the issuance mechanism, the system only references the official Uniswap v4 pool's ETH/$STANDARD net ETH flow. When the net flow is positive, issuance will expand, and protocol fees will be used to accumulate reserve assets; when the net flow is negative, issuance will be reduced, shifting towards the buyback and destruction of STANDARD. The total supply of STANDARD is capped at 1 billion, with 100 million injected into the protocol as permanently held Uniswap v4 liquidity provider across all ranges at genesis, and the remaining 900 million allocated for long-term issuance budget.

According to The Block, Uniswap Labs announced the launch of a new tool, StablePair Hook, designed specifically for stablecoin trading pairs such as USDC/USDT and USDC/USDG.Uniswap Labs stated that StablePair Hook can provide traders with consistent and predictable quotes, allowing liquidity providers to retain more of the value they create. Data shows that in the second quarter, the trading volume of exchanges between stablecoins on Uniswap reached $43.4 billion, surpassing the total of the other three major on-chain trading venues.StablePair Hook replaces fixed rates with dynamic rates, which adjust based on the degree of price deviation from the reference price within the pool. When the price is close to the reference price, the Hook adjusts the transaction fee for each trade to maintain a fixed bid-ask spread; when the price deviates from the reference range, trades that push the price away incur no fees, while trades that pull the price back to the reference price use a Dutch auction mechanism, with fees decreasing block by block from high to low until accepted by the trader. Uniswap Labs stated that this allows liquidity providers to retain more value from price returns.The first batch of StablePair Hook pools will go live on Ethereum, supporting USDC/USDG and USDC/USDT trading pairs. This Hook can be upgraded through Uniswap governance, and the fee system and other parameters can be adjusted without migrating liquidity.

The company TransparentBusiness, which operates Unicoin, has filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of New York Federal Court against Universal Navigation, which operates Uniswap Labs, requesting the court to rule that its UNICOIN trademark does not infringe or dilute the trademarks UNI, UNISWAP, and UNICHAIN claimed by Uniswap, and to request the court to cancel the U.S. trademark registration for UNI.The complaint shows that Uniswap's legal counsel sent three letters to Unicoin on June 3, July 17, and August 14, accusing it of trademark infringement, dilution, domain name squatting, and unfair competition, and demanding that Unicoin cease using the UNICOIN and other identifiers containing UNI, transfer the domain names unicoin.com and unicoin.org, provide income and profit accounts, and pay Uniswap's legal fees. Unicoin also requests the court to confirm that the aforementioned domain names do not violate the U.S. Federal Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.The lawsuit comes weeks before the public issuance of the UNCN token listed on the Unicoin official website on September 28. As of the time of publication, DeFiLlama data shows that the Uniswap protocol ranks first among decentralized exchanges with over $3.9 billion in 24-hour trading volume.

Pons founder and lead developer Ozzy responded on September 9, stating that modifying the tax rate after the token launch is not supported, and the claim that "Pons can adjust the tax rate after launch" is incorrect.Ozzy indicated that the initialized Uniswap V4 pool for Pons has a 0% tax rate and a 1% Hook fee, which is clearly disclosed in all transactions. Some terminals incorrectly routed buy and sell orders to high tax liquidity pools due to router configuration issues, including vampire pools created by malicious actors, resulting in abnormally high tax rates displayed, which is not a modification of the tax rate after Pons' launch.Ozzy has requested the relevant terminals to correct the erroneous routing and stated that if users see a tax rate higher than 1%, unless the deployer set a higher tax rate at launch, it is likely routed to the wrong pool.

Castle Labs posted on platform X that in the past 44 days, the Robinhood chain contributed approximately 8.7 million dollars to the UNI buyback and burn, surpassing the total contributions of all other chains during the same period.

According to Slow Fog monitoring, a certain Router contract was attacked due to security flaws in the Swap entry and uniswapV3SwapCallback, resulting in a loss of approximately 62.28 BNB.The Router did not verify whether the caller was a legitimate V3 Pool, and it also failed to bind the payer in the callback to the original transaction context. The attacker forged a V3 Pool/adapter and injected the victim's address as the payer, utilizing the ERC-20 authorization previously granted to the Router by the user to execute transferFrom() and transfer assets. Users who had previously granted sufficient token authorization to the Router may have their authorized assets transferred away even without further interaction.

According to DUNE data, yesterday the official Uniswap burn mechanism destroyed a total of 178,000 UNI, worth over 1.11 million dollars. Among them, Robinhood Chain contributed a daily destruction amount of up to 144,000 UNI, accounting for over 80%, far exceeding other chains such as Ethereum and Base, fully highlighting the current popularity of the Robinhood Chain ecosystem.Previously reported, on July 15, Uniswap initiated a governance proposal to extend the protocol fee collection and UNI burn mechanism to Robinhood Chain, covering versions v2, v3, and v4. According to the proposal, the protocol fees generated on Robinhood Chain will be deposited into the TokenJar contract on that chain, and Searchers can redeem the fees by bridging UNI back to the Ethereum mainnet and sending it to the burn address.

According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, after UNI reached a new high this year, one address withdrew 1 million UNI (6.36 million USD) from Binance to the blockchain within 3 hours.

According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi's monitoring, UNI has rebounded 98% from the bottom this month. The new address 0xc86...F4972 withdrew 676,874 UNI from Binance 2 hours ago, worth 4.277 million dollars, at an average price of 6.32 dollars.

Memecoin issuance platform Pons announced on Thursday that Uniswap Labs has purchased its token PONS, stating that this move is a "long-term alignment" and is seen as a deepening of cooperation between the two parties. Both parties did not disclose the scale of the purchase, transaction price, or holding address, and Pons did not specify whether Uniswap Labs acquired the tokens through the open market or received a token allocation.Pons is the Memecoin issuance platform that charges the highest issuance fees on the Robinhood Chain, launched on July 13, and deployed the V2 contract on August 3. Its V2 will route tokens raised through joint curve fundraising to the Uniswap V4 pool, while the Robinhood Chain currently accounts for 56.3% of the total trading volume on Uniswap V4. Previously, Uniswap Labs launched a competing issuance platform, Pools.trade, on the Robinhood Chain on August 5, surpassing Pons on its first day of launch.Data shows that Pons generated $5.95 million in fees in the past 24 hours, $28.83 million in fees over the past 7 days, and $40.84 million in fees over the past 30 days, using about 80% of the protocol fees to repurchase PONS, with a cumulative supply destruction of 29.34%. PONS is currently priced at $0.5013, up 17.5% in 24 hours, with a market capitalization of approximately $357 million.

According to the Dune data chart published by analyst Adam, the crypto trading terminal's single-day trading volume on September 2 exceeded $1 billion, marking the first time since January 2025. The multi-chain trading terminal GMGN contributed approximately $479.7 million, accounting for nearly half of the total $1.03 billion, of which 90.7% ($445.5 million) came from Robinhood Chain, which has been online for about two months, while its Solana chain trading volume was only $9.5 million, remaining basically unchanged from 30 days ago.Data from DefiLlama shows that GMGN's trading volume on September 2 reached $490.9 million, the third highest in history, only behind $519.2 million on October 8, 2025, and $494.9 million on October 9. The peak during the issuance of the TRUMP meme coin in January 2025 was $272.4 million. GMGN's BSC chain daily trading volume fell from $91.6 million to $29.6 million during the same period, with a cumulative trading volume of $3.02 billion over 30 days, a month-on-month increase of 21.5%; the day's fee income was $2.46 million, significantly up from $956,000 on August 26. Robinhood Chain's own DEX trading volume set a record of $1.67 billion on September 1, with a cumulative total of $20.36 billion over 30 days, a month-on-month increase of 34.9%, second only to Solana among all networks.

Uniswap founder Hayden posted on the X platform, stating that correlated trading pairs are forming. The top five tokenized SPY trading pairs by trading volume serve as "bridge" trading pairs connecting other common underlying trading pairs, primarily linking to tokenized stocks with higher correlations. This type of market is characterized by globalization, programmability, low costs, and 24/7 operation.Hayden stated that he has been working on the forefront of DeFi for 9 years and believes that AMM has enormous potential. After years of evolution and development, the path for AMM to achieve global dominance is becoming increasingly clear. Tokenization has changed the existence of markets, market makers, and the objects of market trading. Since its launch, Uniswap has been operating autonomously, with a cumulative trading volume exceeding $4.6 trillion, and has increased the share of spot trading volume on decentralized exchanges from less than 1% to over 20%.As AMMs like Uniswap continue to evolve, their liquidity has formed a pattern that most financial markets have yet to notice: correlated trading pairs. AMMs have found a product-market fit in long-tail markets, as most assets previously could not attract the attention of professional market makers. DeFi and AMM have lowered the barriers to market making, opening the market to more participants. Liquidity will concentrate in the places with the lowest risk, rather than being forced to remain in places constrained by traditional infrastructure.

According to the Dune data panel, the trading volume on the Robinhood chain DEX has reached a new high, totaling $1.89 billion in the past 24 hours. In terms of token issuance platforms, Pons continues to hold the top position with an absolute advantage, issuing 24,010 tokens yesterday, while long.xyz issued 2,740 tokens, ranking second.In addition, the Pons platform generated fee revenue of $5.95 million in the past 24 hours, ranking fourth across the network, while Uniswap also benefited from the surge in trading on the Robinhood chain, with protocol revenue increasing to $10.33 million in a single day, ranking second.

According to market news, Uniswap has just welcomed its two highest trading days in history. In just one day yesterday, Uniswap's number of trades exceeded 7 million.

DeFiprime founder Nick Sawinyh analyzed that the Meme coin issuance platform on the Robinhood Chain is massively using tokenized stocks as paired assets. As of September 1, approximately 17.2% of the on-chain supply of 19 high liquidity Robinhood stock tokens is locked in 432 pools that use stock tokens as quoted assets, contributing 31.3% of the DEX trading volume of related stock tokens in the past 24 hours. The four issuance platforms Long, Bankr, Flap, and PAIR have set stock-paired Meme coins as default products.Among them, the AI/NVDA pool holds 8,783 NVDA (accounting for 16.2% of the total on-chain tokenized NVDA), with a 24-hour trading volume of about $6.2 million; the BONER/HIMS pool holds 37,172 HIMS (accounting for 50.4% of the total HIMS on the chain), with a trading volume of about $12.5 million. This mechanism has led to significant premiums for some tokenized stocks over the weekend (when issuers cannot issue more), with HIMS once trading at a premium of 112% compared to the NYSE closing price. The TVL of the Robinhood Chain has nearly doubled since August 1 to $740 million, with on-chain DEX daily trading volume reaching $1.49 billion on August 31. The analysis points out that 9 stock tokens have an on-chain circulating market value of less than $1.5 million, and a single Meme coin pool can absorb a large proportion of the circulating supply. This analysis is based on specific block snapshot data, with prices and pool balances changing rapidly.