U.S. Attorney

The former U.S. Attorney General questioned the constitutionality of the Federal Reserve's structure on behalf of the crypto industry in the Custodia Bank case

ChainCatcher news, according to Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terrett, former U.S. Attorney General Paul Clement, who represented the Loper Bright side in the Supreme Court's Chevron case, has just submitted an amicus brief on behalf of the cryptocurrency industry against the Federal Reserve in the appeal case involving Custodia Bank (crypto-friendly regret).Clement, after recently successfully overturning the Chevron deference principle, raised a question in the submitted amicus brief regarding whether the Federal Reserve violated the Second Article of the U.S. Constitution by allowing the Federal Reserve Chair to make official decisions. This poses a significant challenge for Custodia, as it seeks court intervention to limit the excessive power of the U.S. central bank (which recently denied Custodia's request for access to a master account).Clement stated, "In short, the district court has granted the Federal Reserve Bank Chair such significant and almost unrestricted discretion, which raises serious constitutional questions about whether the Second Article is being violated." Clement essentially questioned whether the structure of the Federal Reserve is constitutional, which makes the significance of this case far beyond just the issue of Custodia Bank.

Caroline Ellison's plea agreement revealed: full cooperation with the U.S. Attorney's Office may result in dismissal of criminal charges

ChainCatcher news, the plea agreement of former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York has been disclosed, including a $250,000 bail, surrender of travel documents, asset forfeiture, etc., which means Caroline Ellison will not be allowed to leave the United States.In addition, the plea agreement also reveals that if Caroline Ellison fully cooperates with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and any other law enforcement agencies designated by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, she will not face further criminal prosecution, except for criminal tax violations related to wire and commodity fraud charges (due to the commingling of funds between FTX and Alameda, she may face lawsuits from other regulatory agencies).Earlier, ChainCatcher reported that the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced charges against Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang, both of whom have pleaded guilty to federal charges, with Caroline Ellison admitting to conspiracy to commit wire fraud against FTX customers, conspiracy to commit wire fraud against Alameda Research lenders, conspiracy to commit commodity fraud, conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering, among seven charges, which could result in a maximum sentence of 110 years in prison. (source link)
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators