Scan to download
BTC $63,735.74 +1.16%
ETH $1,724.16 +1.39%
BNB $584.82 +1.07%
XRP $1.12 +0.83%
SOL $71.69 +3.93%
TRX $0.3249 +0.73%
DOGE $0.0830 +0.22%
ADA $0.1607 -0.14%
BCH $198.31 +0.46%
LINK $7.89 +0.12%
HYPE $69.65 -1.41%
AAVE $73.61 +1.44%
SUI $0.7030 -0.88%
XLM $0.2120 -4.06%
ZEC $468.32 +3.14%
BTC $63,735.74 +1.16%
ETH $1,724.16 +1.39%
BNB $584.82 +1.07%
XRP $1.12 +0.83%
SOL $71.69 +3.93%
TRX $0.3249 +0.73%
DOGE $0.0830 +0.22%
ADA $0.1607 -0.14%
BCH $198.31 +0.46%
LINK $7.89 +0.12%
HYPE $69.65 -1.41%
AAVE $73.61 +1.44%
SUI $0.7030 -0.88%
XLM $0.2120 -4.06%
ZEC $468.32 +3.14%

rac

Axelar responds to security incident: Axelar and IBC are unaffected, the vulnerability originates from a third-party token contract's "infinite minting" issue

The cross-chain protocol Axelar Network released a statement regarding the recent security incident related to Secret Network, stating that there is a misunderstanding within the community about the event. Both Axelar and the Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol (IBC) were not attacked or compromised. The affected token smart contracts were neither developed, deployed, nor maintained by Axelar, and Axelar's firewall mechanism also prevented the impact from spreading to other chains.It is reported that the exploited contract is a forked version based on CW20-ICS20, but the developers removed two core security checks, resulting in an "infinite minting" vulnerability. By deleting the verification mechanisms originally used to prevent such issues, this fork altered the original trust model of the contract and did not undergo a new security audit.Axelar Network explained that anyone can deploy contracts for cross-chain asset wrapping through IBC, and similar contracts have also been used to wrap tokens from other chains into Secret Network. However, the Secret side fork version in this incident has vulnerabilities due to the removal of key security checks. This incident is not a unique logical flaw, nor is it an issue with the IBC protocol itself, but rather a security risk introduced by modifications to third-party contracts.

ZachXBT: Indian scam gang suspected of social engineering to steal coins and self-reported to the police to trace and freeze funds

"On-chain detective" ZachXBT published a case analysis stating that in a cryptocurrency asset case involving an Indian scam gang, the relevant individuals reported the case to law enforcement after their assets were frozen, drawing attention. The incident began when a user sought help, claiming that approximately 5.73 BTC (about $475,000) was frozen on Changelly in March 2025.Subsequent on-chain analysis revealed that these funds could be traced back to multiple social engineering attacks and theft cases related to Bitcoin ATMs targeting U.S. users, with a total amount involved exceeding $1 million and several elderly victims. The investigation showed that the individual provided multiple changing explanations for the source of the funds, including "loan," "boss transfer," and "investment from 2014-2015," and there were significant contradictions in the evidence chain.More concerning is that this user had previously filed a police report in India in December 2025, attempting to recover the frozen funds (case number 3207-P/2025). Subsequent on-chain evidence collection and email data analysis indicated that they might be a "mule" for transferring funds, with some bank documents inconsistent with their identity information. ZachXBT noted that such cases demonstrate that social engineering attacks and cross-border fund transfers continue to occur and remind users to avoid interacting with funds from suspicious sources to prevent triggering compliance freezes or legal risks.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.