JPEX case

A Hong Kong judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a case involving JPEX, stating that cryptocurrencies are considered "property" in Hong Kong

ChainCatcher news, according to Hong Kong media reports, JPEX is suspected of violating regulations by promoting and operating in Hong Kong. The first civil lawsuit involves two plaintiffs seeking to recover 240,000 Tether or 1.85 million Hong Kong dollars from JPEX Group and a total of 7 defendants. One of the defendants, a JPEX registered company in Hong Kong, was absent from last month's hearing. Judge Zhou Zhaowen issued a ruling yesterday stating that the company, as an operator, holds assets and constitutes an express trust but has violated its responsibilities. Particularly, the case of the first plaintiff is evidently strong, thus the judge ordered the company to compensate at the request of the two individuals.According to the statement of claim, the first defendant, a company registered in Australia under JPEX, operates the JPEX virtual asset service and electronic platform. The plaintiffs personally or in their name deposited virtual currency into the platform account, and they request the court to rule that the second defendant has violated good faith and/or must restructure and repay debts. The judge also stated that in many common law jurisdictions, including Hong Kong, courts accept that cryptocurrency is considered "property" and can form a trust.The judge recognized that the two defendants operate a cryptocurrency trading platform, which records the movement of currency between accounts, involving trustee benefits and various agreement terms. Therefore, the defendants, as trustees, violated their responsibilities by transferring assets without authorization.

In the past three years, Hong Kong's virtual asset fraud cases involved a total of 7 billion HKD, and the number of arrests in the JPEX case has increased to 70

ChainCatcher news, according to Hong Kong 01, in recent years, there have been increasing cases of fraud involving virtual asset trading platforms, attracting social attention. The Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Christopher Hui, stated that over the past three years, there have been a total of 7,148 cases of fraud involving virtual assets, with nearly 7 billion HKD involved, more than half of which were related to last year's scams. As of the 20th, in the JPEX case, the police have arrested 70 people, and no one has been prosecuted yet.Christopher Hui pointed out that since September last year, the Securities and Futures Commission has added a "List of Suspicious Virtual Asset Trading Platforms," and as of February 14 this year, there are 14 trading platforms on the list. He stated that since December last year, the Securities and Futures Commission and the Police Force have further implemented an information-sharing mechanism, exchanging complaints and intelligence regarding suspicious activities related to virtual asset trading platforms or virtual assets twice a week. As of February 2 this year, the Securities and Futures Commission and the Police Force have exchanged intelligence on over 100 cases related to virtual asset trading platforms or virtual asset-related activities.

Hong Kong Legislative Council member Wu Jietzhuang: The JPEX case as a singular event will not affect Hong Kong's overall cryptocurrency regulatory policy

ChainCatcher news, in response to the concerns of many industry insiders that the recent unlicensed cryptocurrency exchange JPEX case in Hong Kong may lead to more cautious cryptocurrency regulatory policies in Hong Kong, Legislative Council member Wu Jiezhuang stated in an interview with ChainCatcher: "The JPEX case, as a single event, will not overall affect Hong Kong's cryptocurrency regulatory policies. Currently, the JPEX case has not been adjudicated, and it only indicates that the exchange has suspicions and possibilities of fraud, which may not involve cryptocurrency trading activities. I have also communicated with the leaders of government departments, and they similarly believe that the JPEX incident will not have a significant impact on overall policy. Instead, they view this incident as a good education for investors, emphasizing that trading should be conducted on licensed exchanges to ensure asset safety."In addition, Member Wu Jiezhuang also mentioned that the JPEX case has highlighted some regulatory loopholes, such as the fact that offline cryptocurrency exchange shops have not yet been included in regulation, which is something the government needs to improve in the future. Furthermore, the government should disclose suspicious information as early as possible and timely remind users to minimize their losses.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators