Scan to download
BTC $64,307.87 +0.97%
ETH $1,675.70 +0.40%
BNB $610.75 +1.45%
XRP $1.12 +0.75%
SOL $68.19 +1.51%
TRX $0.3158 +0.18%
DOGE $0.0873 +0.60%
ADA $0.1714 -0.51%
BCH $203.19 -0.91%
LINK $7.92 -0.38%
HYPE $60.28 +3.06%
AAVE $66.09 -0.14%
SUI $0.7584 +0.42%
XLM $0.1864 -0.26%
ZEC $427.11 +3.58%
BTC $64,307.87 +0.97%
ETH $1,675.70 +0.40%
BNB $610.75 +1.45%
XRP $1.12 +0.75%
SOL $68.19 +1.51%
TRX $0.3158 +0.18%
DOGE $0.0873 +0.60%
ADA $0.1714 -0.51%
BCH $203.19 -0.91%
LINK $7.92 -0.38%
HYPE $60.28 +3.06%
AAVE $66.09 -0.14%
SUI $0.7584 +0.42%
XLM $0.1864 -0.26%
ZEC $427.11 +3.58%

for

India's cryptocurrency tax review exposes approximately $930 million in undeclared income, with a comprehensive strengthening of itemized reporting and cross-platform verification for the 2026 tax season

As India's tax enforcement intensifies, cryptocurrency investors face stricter reporting and compliance requirements in the 2026 tax season, with incorrect declarations potentially triggering fines and audits. Reports indicate that under current rules, cryptocurrency gains are still subject to a 30% uniform capital gains tax, and a 1% Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) is levied on transactions exceeding a certain amount, while losses cannot be offset across assets. The new Income Tax Act (2025) came into effect on April 1, 2026, but the core tax framework remains largely unchanged.In terms of reporting, investors must fill out a dedicated Schedule VDA section in the ITR-2 or ITR-3 forms and are required to record each transaction individually, including all operations such as trading, exchanging, transferring, and clearing, rather than just summarizing gains. The report emphasizes that regulatory focus has clearly escalated. The Indian tax authorities will directly obtain user-level transaction data through trading platforms, custodians, and wallet service providers, and will automatically cross-check this with reported information; discrepancies will trigger system flags and audits.Data shows that the Indian tax authorities have issued over 44,000 notices and discovered approximately 88.8 billion rupees (about 930 million USD) in unreported virtual asset income. Meanwhile, the tax department is enhancing its tracking capabilities by combining on-chain analysis tools with international data-sharing mechanisms. Additionally, starting in 2027, India will align with the OECD cryptocurrency reporting framework to achieve automatic exchange of cross-border transaction data, and overseas exchange holdings will gradually come under regulatory scrutiny.Analysis points out that common errors include misuse of reporting forms, omission of airdrop and staking income, and failure to correctly match 1% TDS records, among others. The report emphasizes that cryptocurrency tax compliance is shifting from "post-reporting" to "real-time traceability," and investors need to strengthen year-round record management.

Kalshi, Polymarket and other prediction market platforms jointly sued Kentucky over a 14.25% trading tax

According to Abcnews, several prediction market platforms including Kalshi, Crypto.com, and Polymarket have formed an alliance and filed a lawsuit in state court this Friday, attempting to block Kentucky's newly implemented 14.25% prediction market transaction tax.This tax was passed by the Kentucky legislature in April of this year, targeting transaction fees on prediction market platforms, with a rate of 14.25%, which is higher than the local horse racing industry's tax burden of about 9.75%. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit claim that the tax is discriminatory, unconstitutional, and may conflict with federal law.Prediction market platforms allow users to trade contracts on real-world events (such as economic data, election results, etc.), essentially belonging to the event derivatives market. The plaintiffs argue that this tax will significantly raise compliance costs and may force trading activities to shift to offshore platforms with weaker regulations.Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman stated that he will vigorously defend the law in court and asserted that the state government is capable of handling the related challenges.Meanwhile, Kalshi stated that excessive state-level tax burdens will weaken the competitiveness of the legal market and may drive users to illegal trading platforms that lack regulation and protection.This case is seen as the latest development in the ongoing conflict between the U.S. prediction market industry and state regulatory and tax systems.

Analyst: U.S. Treasury yields rise to the highest level since the birth of Bitcoin, which may continue to suppress the performance of risk assets

Cryptocurrency analyst Darkfost stated on social media that Bitcoin is currently facing one of the most severe U.S. Treasury yield environments since its inception. Although historically, the U.S. federal funds rate and the U.S. dollar index have reached higher levels, the current long-term U.S. Treasury yields remain elevated, with the 30-year and 10-year Treasury yields fluctuating between 4.5% and 5%. Coupled with the market's rising expectations for another interest rate hike within the year, this has led to sustained high funding costs and a tightening liquidity environment.Analysis suggests that in a high-yield environment, investors are more inclined to allocate to low-risk fixed-income assets, thereby diminishing the attractiveness of risk assets, including Bitcoin. Historical experience shows that rising U.S. Treasury yields are often accompanied by tightening financial conditions, which puts pressure on Bitcoin's price movements. The current market is at a critical turning point, with the risk premium of risk assets relative to long-term Treasuries being compressed.However, if the macroeconomic outlook becomes clearer in the future, and investors regain confidence in the bond market, capital inflows into the bond market may drive yields down, thereby expanding the risk premium and improving the investment environment for risk assets like Bitcoin. The market generally believes that this process may take several months, and its evolution will largely depend on the development of U.S. government policies and the overall economic situation.

a16z co-founder: Support the establishment of trust and safety guardrails for the new era, oppose regulations that stifle AI innovation

Marc Andreessen, co-founder of the venture capital firm a16z, published an article outlining his stance on AI regulation by the U.S. government. He stated that if so-called regulation means creating complex rules by people who do not understand the technology, suppressing innovation through layers of approval and compliance requirements, and ultimately becoming a tool for large enterprises to consolidate market positions and hinder newcomers, then he will firmly oppose such regulation.In his view, excessive regulation often leads to startups being crushed by cumbersome procedures and high compliance costs, causing innovative talent to flow to more open markets, while regulatory agencies themselves continue to expand, ultimately deviating from their original goals.Andreessen specifically criticized the regulatory mindset centered on the "precautionary principle," arguing that if this concept is amplified indefinitely, it could lead society to reject new technologies out of fear of potential risks. Many regulatory measures often arrive late, after fundamental changes in technology and industry have already occurred, making it difficult to address real issues and potentially becoming obstacles to innovative development. He also attributed the relatively lagging state of technological innovation in Europe in recent years to a culture of excessive regulation, believing that regulation should not become a moat to protect vested interests and raise market entry barriers.However, Andreessen emphasized that he does not oppose all forms of regulation. On the contrary, he supports rules that can build market trust, ensure public safety, and maintain fair competition. For example, preventing AI from faking voices to commit financial fraud, preventing deepfake content from interfering with elections, preventing technology from being used to harm vulnerable groups, and ensuring that consumers and businesses can safely use new technologies.In his view, reasonable regulation is like guardrails on a highway and a braking system in a car; it does not hinder technological progress but rather allows innovation to develop in a faster and more sustainable manner. Andreessen stated that what is truly worth pursuing is not "zero regulation" or "heavy regulation," but finding a balance between innovative vitality and social trust, which is also his unwavering stance.Previously, the U.S. government forcibly "recalled" commercial models due to jailbreak risks, leading Anthropic to take Fable 5 offline overnight and publicly protest.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.