anonymous

According to official news, the anonymous Q&A game Chomp has completed a $3.6 million financing round, led jointly by Jsquare and Blueyard, with participation from VCs such as Accomplice, Big Brain Holdings, No Limit Holdings, Reverie, and Caballeros.Chomp is a social game based on anonymous Q&A and prediction mechanisms, allowing users to answer questions and predict others' answers, uncovering the public's true thoughts and their own biases in understanding others. In addition to consumer products, Chomp also applies these anonymous, well-labeled opinion data to scenarios such as AI model training and consumer research.The company believes that this type of data can capture subjective opinions that are difficult to obtain from the public internet and provide high-context data for AI models. Founder and CEO Kiko previously served as COO of Orca, a decentralized trading platform in the Solana ecosystem.

Zhao Changpeng posted on the X platform stating that Giggle's second-largest anonymous donor is its previous "public address," thanking everyone who contributed to this.CZ previously stated that the BNB in the "public address" and the "Binance People" tokens purchased with BNB will be donated to Giggle Academy. After that, this address will stop being used and will be turned into a burn address to avoid the community overinterpreting the operations of the public address.

Vitalik posted on the X platform stating that he has developed a toy demonstration version of the idea of a "censored anonymous bulletin board" on Aztec. This idea comes from his previous article on using SNARKs, and it is still in the early stages, but it can already achieve interesting and non-trivial functionalities.

Vitalik Buterin posted that there is a winner in the AI anonymous recognition challenge experiment he previously initiated. In this experiment, he wrote the Chinese version of EIP-7503 (Zero-Knowledge Wormhole) in 2024, manually corrected after using Qwen 2.5 for local translation, in an attempt to hide his identity.The article states that although the prose style was effectively blurred, the AI successfully identified it by detecting unique thinking habits in mathematics and algorithm explanations (such as specific numerical examples and logical chains), completely bypassing its obfuscation strategy that only targeted prose.

According to Cointelegraph, the New York State Supreme Court faced a key defense in the lawsuit regarding the ownership of 39,069 long-unused Bitcoin addresses. An anonymous defendant controlling the dormant wallet involved in the case formally submitted a request to the court to dismiss the lawsuit outright. This anonymous holder presented a core legal argument: Bitcoin addresses are merely a string of data characters on the blockchain, do not belong to a legal entity, and are not eligible to be sued.In addition, industry perspectives highlighted a critical technical shortcoming of the case: even if the court ultimately rules in favor of the plaintiff's claim for rights, without possessing the corresponding private keys, the plaintiff would be unable to transfer or control this batch of Bitcoin assets on-chain, rendering the judgment practically unenforceable.The plaintiff in this lawsuit attempted to apply New York's lost property regulations, claiming that tens of thousands of long-sleeping BTC belong to unclaimed abandoned assets, intending to obtain full ownership of the assets through judicial means.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated that there have been recent voices suggesting that AI text analysis will make online anonymity difficult to maintain.To this end, he revealed that at some point in this decade, he had anonymously authored a public document of moderate importance to Ethereum, estimating that there are about 200 to 2000 documents in the Ethereum ecosystem that are of no less importance than that document.Vitalik invited the community and AI tools to "find" this anonymous work among these documents, in order to test whether AI can de-anonymize authors in large-scale texts through methods such as stylistic analysis.

According to CryptoNews, the European Union will implement revised anti-money laundering (AML) regulations starting from July 10, 2027. The new rules require cryptocurrency asset service providers (CASP) to execute stricter "KYC" procedures for transactions exceeding 1,000 euros, and anonymous accounts and services related to privacy coins will be completely banned. In addition, a cap of 10,000 euros (approximately 11,500 dollars) has been set for commercial cash payments across the EU, and for cash transactions of 3,000 euros (approximately 3,450 dollars) or more, traders and other obligated entities must verify customer identities and conduct due diligence before completing the transaction.

According to Arkham data, at 19:54, 355.61 BTC (worth approximately $20,137,800) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with bc1qmd...) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qwpp...). Subsequently, that address transferred a portion of the BTC (55.61 BTC) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qll...).

According to Arkham data, at 19:00, 354.99 BTC (worth approximately 23.8368 million USD) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with 3Da3...) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qr...).

According to Arkham data, at 18:22, 355.06 BTC (worth approximately 23.76 million USD) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with bc1qugxl6...) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qw3397...). Subsequently, that address transferred a portion of the BTC (0.067185 BTC) to Coinbase.

According to Arkham data, at 17:54, 1979.81 BTC (worth approximately 133 million USD) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with bc1qsahcm...) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qgv68y...). Subsequently, the address transferred a portion of the BTC (0.03438986 BTC) to Coinbase.

According to Arkham data, at 14:40, 355.09 BTC (worth approximately 23.76 million USD) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with bc1q08cyv...) to another anonymous address (starting with 3GcxuZnE...). Subsequently, that address transferred 355.07 BTC to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qq68v7...).

According to Arkham data, at 13:40, 355.1 BTC (worth approximately 23.75 million USD) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with 3CgfYbVV...) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1q08cy...).

According to Arkham data, at 13:32, 355.1 BTC (worth approximately 23.74 million USD) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with bc1qaj...) to another anonymous address (starting with 3CgfYb...).

According to Arkham data, at 13:06, 355.1 BTC (worth approximately $23.7432 million) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with 3GcVwL...) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qaj...).

According to Arkham data, at 12:23, 0.09 BTC (worth approximately $6010) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with 3D5zf6c...) to another anonymous address (starting with 3C65fYq...). Subsequently, the address transferred 0.09 BTC to Binance.

According to Arkham data, at 12:12, 355.11 BTC (worth approximately 23.73 million USD) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with bc1q6m4c...) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qlyt2...). Subsequently, that address transferred part of the BTC (355.11 BTC) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qan3y...).

According to Arkham data, at 11:45, 355.11 BTC (worth approximately $23.7363 million) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with bc1qhwlc3...) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qjq8rmm...).

According to Arkham data, at 10:11, 355.12 BTC (worth approximately $23.7476 million) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with 3MnhtmEtfR...) to another anonymous address (starting with 3NbTUU1HWD...). Subsequently, that address transferred 355.11 BTC to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qan93p95...).

According to Arkham data, at 09:32, 355.16 BTC (worth approximately 23.74 million USD) was transferred from one anonymous address (starting with bc1qpekw0...) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qtx76...). Subsequently, that address transferred 355.14 BTC to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qn5q8...).