Allegations

TikTok faces allegations of operating a cryptocurrency exchange business in the UK

ChainCatcher news, according to Cryptonews, the short video application TikTok is under scrutiny for allegedly operating in the UK in a manner similar to cryptocurrency exchanges. It is reported that a compliance expert has warned the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), suggesting that TikTok undergo checks for money laundering and terrorist financing. The expert emphasized that the virtual tokens on TikTok could potentially be indirectly exchanged for real currency through its creator program, which is concerning.This scrutiny stems from TikTok's virtual currency system—TikTok tokens. Users can purchase tokens with real money and gift them on the platform or during live streams. They may also have the option to exchange these tokens back for cash. This process is similar to cryptocurrency trading. Given the strict regulations surrounding cryptocurrency businesses, this system has raised regulatory concerns. Critics argue that TikTok's handling of virtual currency may face the same scrutiny as cryptocurrency platforms. Additionally, such cryptocurrency-like transactions have raised concerns about the security of users' financial data, especially considering the geopolitical sensitivities.It is reported that the letter stated: "TikTok provides funding transfer services for money service businesses through its rewards program and facilitates the exchange of crypto assets for currency or currency for crypto assets, or makes arrangements for such exchanges." As of the time of publication, neither TikTok nor the FCA has responded to Cryptonews' request for comment.

FTX former executive Ryan Salame's partner Michelle Bond denies campaign finance violation allegations

ChainCatcher news, FTX's former co-CEO Ryan Salame's partner Michelle Bond pleaded not guilty to four counts of campaign finance violations in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. These charges include conspiracy to cause illegal campaign contributions, causing and accepting excessive campaign contributions, causing and accepting illegal corporate contributions, and causing and accepting intermediary contributions.The charges stem from Bond's alleged concealment of funding sources during her 2022 campaign for a Republican seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. It is alleged that Salame arranged for FTX to pay $400,000 to fund her campaign, while Bond is accused of making false statements to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and congressional committees. Notably, Salame had previously pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 90 months in prison, but after Bond was indicted, he requested the court to withdraw his plea, claiming it was based on a promise from prosecutors not to investigate his partner. Judge Lewis Kaplan stated he would consider whether to withdraw Salame's plea.Currently, Bond remains free on a $1 million bail but is restricted to travel within the continental United States. Judge George Daniels has scheduled a pretrial conference for January 2025. In the criminal cases against FTX and Alameda Research, as of September 18, only Salame and SBF have been sentenced to imprisonment. Sentencing hearings for other implicated executives will take place in the coming months.

The SEC accuses Galois Capital of violating custody rules and misleading investors

ChainCatcher news, the SEC has charged the cryptocurrency asset investment advisory firm Galois Capital Management LLC for failing to comply with client asset protection regulations and misleading investors about the redemption notice period. To settle the SEC's charges, Galois has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $225,000, which will be distributed to the harmed investors of its funds.The SEC's investigation found that since July 2022, Galois Capital failed to ensure that certain cryptocurrency assets held by its managed private funds were custodied by qualified custodians, violating the custody rules of the Investment Advisers Act. The company stored some assets on trading platforms of non-qualified custodians, including FTX, resulting in the loss of about half of its managed assets when FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022.Additionally, Galois Capital informed some investors that redemptions required a five-business-day notice, while actually allowing other investors to redeem with shorter notice, constituting misleading behavior. Corey Schuster, co-director of the SEC's Asset Management Division, emphasized that they will continue to hold advisors accountable for violating core investor protection obligations. Galois Capital has agreed to cease the violations and accept censure but did not admit or deny the findings of the SEC's investigation.

Musk and Tesla win lawsuit, dismissing allegations of Dogecoin manipulation and insider trading

ChainCatcher news, according to a report by Reuters, Elon Musk and his electric vehicle company Tesla (TSLA.O) have successfully won the dismissal of a federal lawsuit that accused them of defrauding investors by exaggerating the value of the cryptocurrency Dogecoin and engaging in insider trading, resulting in billions of dollars in losses. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein in Manhattan issued this ruling on Thursday evening.Investors accused the world's richest man of profiting from trades at their expense through Twitter posts, an appearance on NBC's "Saturday Night Live" in 2021, and other promotional stunts, using multiple Dogecoin wallets controlled by him or Tesla. They also claimed that Musk deliberately inflated the price of Dogecoin by over 36,000% over two years, only to let it crash, while he and Tesla often timed their trades based on Musk's public statements and activities regarding Dogecoin.However, Hellerstein stated that Musk's tweets about "Dogecoin being the currency of the future on Earth, usable to purchase Tesla cars, or sent to the moon by his company SpaceX" were "idealized and exaggerated, not facts, and easily falsifiable," meaning that no rational investor could rely on these tweets to file a securities fraud lawsuit, and thus "could not comprehend" the market manipulation and insider trading allegations raised by the investors. Hellerstein dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled. The investors initially sought $258 billion in damages and amended their complaint four times over two years. In seeking to dismiss the lawsuit, Musk's lawyers argued that his "harmless and often silly tweets" posed no issue. They also stated that there was no evidence that Musk owned two wallets for suspicious trading, nor was there evidence that he or Tesla had ever sold Dogecoin.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators