It only makes sense to create RAI (or fork) multi-collateral when "multi-collateral" refers to a very narrow form of multi-collateral (ETH and staked ETH).

This article will delve into the historical attempts to bring trading closer to a trustless model, the limitations of these technologies, and some updated and more powerful ideas relying on ZK-SNARKs and other advanced technologies.

If we can build L2 protocols anchored to L1 for security and add scalability on top, can we then build L3 protocols anchored to L2 for security and add even more scalability on top?

Is there a better way to allocate domain ownership? Can it bring more benefits to the ENS DAO, ensuring that domains are acquired by those who can maximize their use, while preserving the value of ENS—trustworthy neutrality and long-term ownership assurance?

Vitalik stated that he hopes to make Ethereum more suitable for ZK-Snark by improving ZK-EVM and Ethereum itself, and there is no need for Ethereum to standardize a single ZK-EVM implementation for L1 use.

"Be brave, fight for your values, and be a Bitcoin maximalist."

Ethereum's biggest challenge lies in balancing two visions: one that values security and a simple, pure blockchain, and another that is a high-performance and feature-rich platform for building advanced applications.

Transferability shifts governance power from those most likely to provide valuable inputs for governance to those most likely to create problems driven by a thirst for power.

Cross-chain activities have a counter-network effect: although they occur infrequently and are relatively safe, the more they happen, the greater the risk.

"In terms of technology, I am more correct in abstract ideas than in the issues of producing software development. Over time, I must learn to understand the latter."