BTC $64,596.39 -1.91%
ETH $1,808.19 -2.05%
BNB $589.92 -0.42%
XRP $0.9480 -1.76%
SOL $71.29 -2.30%
TRX $0.3051 -0.73%
DOGE $0.0585 -3.48%
ADA $0.1526 -2.58%
BCH $207.24 -1.11%
LINK $9.21 +0.11%
HYPE $66.26 +0.16%
AAVE $106.46 +2.81%
SUI $0.7155 -2.52%
XLM $0.1378 +0.18%
ZEC $894.92 +1.81%
AAPL $356.64 +0.06%
AMZN $263.27 +0.17%
GOOGL $291.69 +0.36%
MSFT $520.24 +0.02%
META $633.15 -0.40%
NVDA $160.80 +0.53%
TSLA $387.32 +0.44%
SNDK $856.52 +0.70%
INTC $57.63 +0.33%
SPCX $138.66 +2.54%
MU $758.51 +0.21%
AMD $521.37 +0.39%
BTC $64,596.39 -1.91%
ETH $1,808.19 -2.05%
BNB $589.92 -0.42%
XRP $0.9480 -1.76%
SOL $71.29 -2.30%
TRX $0.3051 -0.73%
DOGE $0.0585 -3.48%
ADA $0.1526 -2.58%
BCH $207.24 -1.11%
LINK $9.21 +0.11%
HYPE $66.26 +0.16%
AAVE $106.46 +2.81%
SUI $0.7155 -2.52%
XLM $0.1378 +0.18%
ZEC $894.92 +1.81%
AAPL $356.64 +0.06%
AMZN $263.27 +0.17%
GOOGL $291.69 +0.36%
MSFT $520.24 +0.02%
META $633.15 -0.40%
NVDA $160.80 +0.53%
TSLA $387.32 +0.44%
SNDK $856.52 +0.70%
INTC $57.63 +0.33%
SPCX $138.66 +2.54%
MU $758.51 +0.21%
AMD $521.37 +0.39%

x

All
Article
Flash

The number of signatories for the Huang Renxun (Jensen Huang) return petition has surpassed 150,000, with public support from Elon Musk, Tom Lee, and others

The petition website requesting the Nvidia board to reinstate Jensen Huang continues to gain traction, with 151,083 signatures collected so far, including 7,380 current employees, 1,381 former employees, and 80,205 shareholders. Notable public figures such as Elon Musk, Tom Lee, and Replit CEO Amjad Masad have publicly signed the petition.Previously, on November 12, 2026, Nvidia announced that Jensen Huang had resigned from his position as CEO, effective immediately. This marked the end of his 33-year tenure leading the company he co-founded.The organizers and signatories of this initiative are concerned that Huang may have been forced to resign without due process and without sufficient time to defend himself, thus they are calling for an explanation from the board. The core demands of the open letter to the Nvidia board are: to reinstate Jensen Huang as CEO during the independent investigation to ascertain the facts; if he must continue to be absent, to provide an evidence-supported explanation. Ensure the investigation is independent, publicly scoped, and timely, and grant Jensen Huang a fair opportunity to defend himself. Provide a timely public statement explaining the relevant concerns, evidence, and the balancing of interests for employees and shareholders.The letter emphasizes: "Thirty-three years of leadership does not mean immunity from accountability, but accountability requires evidence and due process, not a public trial by the mob." The website states that this initiative is independent and has not been endorsed by Nvidia or Jensen Huang himself.

Specter: Beware of misjudgments regarding the ownership of Ethereum Foundation addresses; incorrect wallet tagging may exacerbate market panic

On-chain analyst Specter stated that there have been frequent claims in the market recently that "the Ethereum Foundation is selling ETH," but there is insufficient evidence regarding the ownership of some related wallets.Specter pointed out an example of a wallet marked as associated with the foundation, noting that although its early fund flows can be traced back to foundation-related addresses, it underwent transfers through multiple independent entities in between. This wallet has participated in DeFi activities such as BAT ICO, Compound, and Maker, with a total of over 3,400 transactions, which aligns more with the characteristics of independent investors who have long participated in ICOs and DeFi, and cannot simply be classified as an Ethereum Foundation wallet based solely on early fund associations.The early ETH allocation may have been compensation for engineers or team members, or it may involve private transactions or over-the-counter purchases by investors. The Ethereum Foundation disclosed in January 2016 that it conducted a private sale of ETH worth approximately $650,000 to individuals and companies, so the related funds may also come from such transactions.Historical transaction associations do not prove that two addresses are held or controlled by the same entity. Directly labeling all wallets that have had financial interactions with foundation addresses as team wallets lacks sufficient basis and may even trigger unnecessary market panic. Reliable wallet ownership judgments should combine on-chain tracking with independent off-chain evidence.

Approximately 64,000 Bitcoin mining machines were hijacked, and 13 EH/s of computing power was redirected to the OCEAN mining pool

According to Bitcoin News monitoring, approximately 64,000 Bitcoin mining machines have reportedly been hijacked, involving 13 EH/s of computing power. The mining machine's computing power was redirected to the OCEAN mining pool, with earnings designated to be paid to a Bitcoin address controlled by the attackers. The attack reportedly began around 8 PM Central Time.The OCEAN dashboard showed that its computing power once approached 50 EH/s, before falling back to about 40 EH/s. CoreX Hosting was the first to raise the alarm, stating that the mining machines were switched to other mining pools without authorization. An affected operator claimed that their entire mining farm was hijacked and pointed out that Luxor's Commander mining management software was the source of this security incident; other operators reported that similar unauthorized changes to mining pools had occurred a few days prior.CoreX subsequently stated that the attack appeared to be over, with the hijacked computing power dropping from 13 EH/s to about 100 PH/s. The attackers reportedly failed to mine any Bitcoin blocks during the hijacking, thus not receiving any block rewards; affected miners permanently lost the opportunity to earn Bitcoin during the attack. The full scope of the impact of this security incident, as well as whether Luxor Commander was compromised, has yet to be independently confirmed.

Famous HYPE holders: It is recommended to store assets on-chain by yourself to reduce CEX market manipulation

A well-known HYPE holder NMTD.HL stated that centralized exchanges (CEX) may use the platform assets deposited by users for trading, and after causing user positions to be liquidated, return the relevant tokens to the original accounts or reserves, profiting from the price difference.He also claimed that most tokens deposited in CEX may face long-term price pressure because users effectively hand over control of asset prices to the platform and its management. NMTD.HL believes that this behavior has persisted for many years, continuously draining liquidity from the crypto industry, and questions whether some centralized exchanges may still have solvency issues.NMTD.HL urges users to self-custody their on-chain assets and transfer BTC, ETH, and other crypto assets to on-chain. The more users turn to on-chain trading and trade through decentralized platforms like Hyperliquid, the less opportunity centralized exchanges have to manipulate prices using user assets and target user stop-loss and liquidation positions.Centralized platforms belong to a closed system lacking transparency, and their profit model may involve using user deposits for reverse trading with users, profiting by triggering stop-losses and liquidations. For the crypto industry to achieve long-term development, reliance on centralized exchanges must be reduced, and Hyperliquid is the key platform driving the industry to realize this transition.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.