MIT

Expert: OpenAI may have already exceeded the limitations of a nonprofit structure and is facing expensive restructuring

ChainCatcher news, according to Fortune, as OpenAI's valuation skyrockets to $157 billion, its unique hybrid structure of nonprofit and for-profit is facing severe challenges. Experts believe that OpenAI may have reached or exceeded the limits of its corporate structure, which could lead to costly and complex restructuring. OpenAI currently operates as a nonprofit organization with the mission of developing artificial intelligence that benefits "all of humanity," while controlling a for-profit subsidiary. UCLA law professor Jill Horwitz emphasizes that when conflicts arise between the nonprofit and for-profit sectors, charitable purposes must take precedence.If the nonprofit sector loses control over its subsidiary, OpenAI may need to pay fair market value for interests and assets that originally belonged to the nonprofit sector. This involves complex asset evaluations, including intellectual property, patents, commercial products, and licenses. Experts anticipate that OpenAI may face rigorous scrutiny from the IRS, the Delaware Attorney General's office, and the California Attorney General's office.OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently confirmed that the company is considering restructuring, potentially transitioning to a public benefit corporation, but specific details have not been disclosed. OpenAI board chair Bret Taylor stated that the board is focused on fulfilling its fiduciary duties, and any potential restructuring will ensure that the nonprofit organization continues to exist and thrive. However, some observers, including former board member Elon Musk, express skepticism about whether OpenAI remains true to its mission.

The FBI is accused of violating the MIT License when using smart contract code

ChainCatcher news, according to Cointelegraph, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has been criticized for allegedly violating the terms of the MIT License in its smart contracts. X user 0xCygaar (self-identified as an AbstractChain contributor) publicly accused the agency of not properly including the required license attribution when using the OpenZeppelin library (an open-source code resource). If confirmed, this omission could constitute a violation of copyright law, as the MIT License explicitly requires that any substantial use or modification of its code includes the original license. X users claim they have warned the FBI to "take necessary measures against the FBI."The MIT License governs the use of blockchain technology, particularly within the Ethereum ecosystem. It can be distributed, modified, and used for free as long as the original license terms are followed. A public inspection of the FBI's smart contract on Etherscan shows that the code is marked as "unlicensed," sparking varied reactions from the community. The implications of the alleged violation could be serious, as the MIT License, while generally considered developer-friendly, is legally binding, and if OpenZeppelin chooses to do so, it can take legal action by sending a cease-and-desist order requiring the FBI to rectify the violation or stop using the code. However, any formal lawsuit against the FBI would face challenges due to sovereign immunity.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators