ISP

OKLink Annual Security Report: In 2024, losses across the network due to private key leaks decreased by 65% compared to the previous year, thanks to the indispensable role of on-chain tools

ChainCatcher news, OKLink has officially released the 2024 Security Annual Report, which states that the cumulative losses from on-chain security incidents across the network amount to approximately $1.945 billion. The losses due to private key leaks have decreased by 65.45% compared to 2023, totaling about $305 million, which accounts for 16% of the total losses. Among these, phishing scams caused losses of $705 million, accounting for 36% of the total losses. REKT incidents and RugPull incidents caused losses of $383 million and $141 million, respectively.Mainstream public chains remain the primary targets for hacker attacks, with losses for major public chains such as BTC, ETH, and ARB reaching $744 million, $902 million, and $228 million, respectively. In 2024, OKLink continues to make efforts, providing core technical support to over 120 municipal-level units and successfully assisting in handling more than 300 cases, with a total amount involved of approximately $685 million.At the same time, OKLink also offers a variety of on-chain security tools and features, such as address monitoring and token authorization queries, helping users quickly check and manage the assets authorized to smart contracts by addresses, identify suspicious transactions and addresses, thereby preventing fraudulent transactions.

The People's Court of Lingling District, Yongzhou City, has concluded a dispute over unjust enrichment arising from the failure to repay with virtual currency

ChainCatcher news, according to the official WeChat account of the People's Court of Lingling District, Yongzhou City, the People's Court of Lingling District, Yongzhou City recently concluded a dispute over unjust enrichment arising from the failure to repay with virtual currency. In January 2020, Yang transferred 78,000 yuan to Xie via WeChat, hoping that Xie would help him purchase a certain virtual currency on a platform for investment and entrusted Xie to hold it on his behalf. Subsequently, Xie purchased the virtual currency as entrusted by Yang and held it for him. After a period of time, Yang requested to withdraw from the investment, and Xie transferred 3,000 units of the virtual currency to Yang's "wallet address" on the platform, stating that a settlement would be made later.In April 2021, Yang sued Xie in court. Through court mediation, the two parties reached a consensus mediation agreement, and Xie agreed to return 78,000 yuan to Yang in a lump sum. After returning 57,000 yuan to Yang, Xie was unwilling to return the remaining debt, claiming that the 3,000 units of virtual currency previously transferred to Yang were worth over 20,000 yuan and should be deducted from the debt. Yang did not accept this repayment method, and due to the failure to offset the debt, Xie requested Yang to return the virtual currency, but the virtual currency platform had already closed. Xie then sued in court, requesting Yang to return the equivalent cash value of over 20,000 yuan for the 3,000 units of virtual currency.After hearing the case, the People's Court of Lingling District held that the Civil Code aims to protect the legitimate rights and interests of civil subjects and maintain social and economic order. The virtual currency does not have the same legal status as legal tender, does not have legal compensability, and should not and cannot be circulated as currency in the market. Xie's request for Yang to return the cash value of 3,000 units of virtual currency essentially constitutes a claim for the exchange between virtual currency and legal tender, which lacks legality, and the parties did not reach an agreement on the compensation amount for the virtual currency. Ultimately, the court ruled to dismiss Xie's lawsuit. After Xie appealed the judgment, the second-instance court upheld the original ruling.

The original team of the encrypted data platform Non-Small Number is in a public dispute with the buyer over brand ownership

ChainCatcher news, the brand ownership dispute of the cryptocurrency data platform FeiXiaoHao continues to escalate. The original FeiXiaoHao team issued a statement on December 13, claiming that the buyer obtained part of the source code and data after paying the first installment, and then publicly tore up the contract and refused to pay the final payment. The buyer, without paying the final installment, requested an overall brand transfer, which was rejected, and was accused of publicly reselling the source code and data, causing significant losses to the original team. The original team has canceled the brand sale plan and stated that they will continue operations.In response to the above accusations, the buyer published a lengthy article refuting the claims, stating that they have legally registered an overseas company and trademark, and pointed out multiple breaches of contract by the original team: incomplete source code delivery leading to inability to deploy normally, and the same source code being sold to multiple buyers. The buyer stated that after taking over Feixiaohao.com.cn, they invested hundreds of thousands of dollars and spent four months repairing the system before it was back online.Additionally, the buyer revealed several future development plans, including improving the Meme token leaderboard, advancing global layout, adding KOL columns, and VC inclusion among other functional modules. The buyer has now initiated legal proceedings and will maintain their rights through the public disclosure of acquisition details and related evidence.

The Qianhai Court in Shenzhen ruled on a wage payment dispute case, deciding that virtual currency cannot be used as a method of wage payment

According to ChainCatcher news, the Shenzhen News Network reported that the People's Court of Qianhai Cooperation Zone in Shenzhen recently made a ruling on a labor dispute case involving virtual currency salary payments. The case originated in June 2021, when the plaintiff, Zhou, joined a company as a senior engineer, claiming that he had agreed with the company on a monthly salary of 45,000 yuan, of which 20,000 yuan would be paid via bank transfer and the remaining 25,000 yuan in the form of USDT. Two months later, the company terminated the labor contract on the grounds of "skills not matching," but did not pay the agreed portion of the salary in virtual currency.The court determined that, according to the "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" issued by the central bank and ten other departments in September 2021, virtual currencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT do not have legal tender status. At the same time, Article 50 of the Labor Law and Article 5 of the Interim Provisions on Wage Payment clearly state that wages must be paid in legal currency on a monthly basis and cannot be replaced by other forms.Ultimately, the court only supported the plaintiff's claim regarding the unlawful termination of the labor contract, ordering the company to pay 10,000 yuan in compensation. The case was upheld by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court in the second instance.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators