ISP

The original team of the encrypted data platform Non-Small Number is in a public dispute with the buyer over brand ownership

ChainCatcher news, the brand ownership dispute of the cryptocurrency data platform FeiXiaoHao continues to escalate. The original FeiXiaoHao team issued a statement on December 13, claiming that the buyer obtained part of the source code and data after paying the first installment, and then publicly tore up the contract and refused to pay the final payment. The buyer, without paying the final installment, requested an overall brand transfer, which was rejected, and was accused of publicly reselling the source code and data, causing significant losses to the original team. The original team has canceled the brand sale plan and stated that they will continue operations.In response to the above accusations, the buyer published a lengthy article refuting the claims, stating that they have legally registered an overseas company and trademark, and pointed out multiple breaches of contract by the original team: incomplete source code delivery leading to inability to deploy normally, and the same source code being sold to multiple buyers. The buyer stated that after taking over Feixiaohao.com.cn, they invested hundreds of thousands of dollars and spent four months repairing the system before it was back online.Additionally, the buyer revealed several future development plans, including improving the Meme token leaderboard, advancing global layout, adding KOL columns, and VC inclusion among other functional modules. The buyer has now initiated legal proceedings and will maintain their rights through the public disclosure of acquisition details and related evidence.

The Qianhai Court in Shenzhen ruled on a wage payment dispute case, deciding that virtual currency cannot be used as a method of wage payment

According to ChainCatcher news, the Shenzhen News Network reported that the People's Court of Qianhai Cooperation Zone in Shenzhen recently made a ruling on a labor dispute case involving virtual currency salary payments. The case originated in June 2021, when the plaintiff, Zhou, joined a company as a senior engineer, claiming that he had agreed with the company on a monthly salary of 45,000 yuan, of which 20,000 yuan would be paid via bank transfer and the remaining 25,000 yuan in the form of USDT. Two months later, the company terminated the labor contract on the grounds of "skills not matching," but did not pay the agreed portion of the salary in virtual currency.The court determined that, according to the "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" issued by the central bank and ten other departments in September 2021, virtual currencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT do not have legal tender status. At the same time, Article 50 of the Labor Law and Article 5 of the Interim Provisions on Wage Payment clearly state that wages must be paid in legal currency on a monthly basis and cannot be replaced by other forms.Ultimately, the court only supported the plaintiff's claim regarding the unlawful termination of the labor contract, ordering the company to pay 10,000 yuan in compensation. The case was upheld by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court in the second instance.

Legal professionals: A feasible plan should be introduced to address the issue of the inability to dispose of seized and frozen virtual currencies in judicial practice, maximizing the protection of the parties' interests

ChainCatcher news, Sun Guanjun, the chief judge of the People's Court of Taiping and a senior judge at level four, and Wei Yuzheng, a judicial police officer from the judicial police team, co-authored "The Validity of Virtual Currency Transactions." The article points out that the legal and regulatory framework regarding the validity of virtual currency transactions should be improved as soon as possible.On one hand, it is necessary to quickly resolve historical issues and provide corresponding solutions on how to handle virtual currency transactions that occurred before the issuance of the "Announcement on Preventing the Risks of Token Issuance Financing" by the People's Bank of China, the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the China Banking Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and the China Insurance Regulatory Commission.On the other hand, for the issues faced in judicial practice regarding the seizure and confiscation of virtual currencies that cannot be disposed of, feasible solutions should be introduced to maximize the protection of the parties' interests.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators