BTC $84,239.50 +1.45%
ETH $2,727.59 +2.38%
BNB $765.10 +0.30%
XRP $1.51 +1.17%
SOL $119.76 +0.90%
TRX $0.3355 +0.46%
DOGE $0.0955 +2.43%
ADA $0.2536 +3.19%
BCH $312.86 +0.80%
LINK $15.40 +9.53%
HYPE $88.67 -2.02%
AAVE $171.19 +15.55%
SUI $1.18 -0.18%
XLM $0.2335 +9.58%
ZEC $1,430.17 -8.76%
AAPL $337.18 -0.86%
AMZN $247.01 -0.45%
GOOGL $342.95 +0.68%
MSFT $509.19 -0.83%
META $725.14 -0.87%
NVDA $230.58 +1.69%
TSLA $358.98 -3.02%
SNDK $1,733.67 +0.80%
INTC $116.71 -2.14%
SPCX $147.04 -1.89%
MU $1,070.89 +0.71%
AMD $615.32 -0.41%
BTC $84,239.50 +1.45%
ETH $2,727.59 +2.38%
BNB $765.10 +0.30%
XRP $1.51 +1.17%
SOL $119.76 +0.90%
TRX $0.3355 +0.46%
DOGE $0.0955 +2.43%
ADA $0.2536 +3.19%
BCH $312.86 +0.80%
LINK $15.40 +9.53%
HYPE $88.67 -2.02%
AAVE $171.19 +15.55%
SUI $1.18 -0.18%
XLM $0.2335 +9.58%
ZEC $1,430.17 -8.76%
AAPL $337.18 -0.86%
AMZN $247.01 -0.45%
GOOGL $342.95 +0.68%
MSFT $509.19 -0.83%
META $725.14 -0.87%
NVDA $230.58 +1.69%
TSLA $358.98 -3.02%
SNDK $1,733.67 +0.80%
INTC $116.71 -2.14%
SPCX $147.04 -1.89%
MU $1,070.89 +0.71%
AMD $615.32 -0.41%

aw

All
Article
Flash

first_img A user claimed that the 50 BTC deposited into Solv Protocol have not been withdrawn for over 2 months

User @neillee99 posted that the approximately 50 BTC held in Solv Protocol cannot be redeemed normally. The user stated that on July 8, 2026, they withdrew about 50 BTC from Binance, which was converted into SolvBTC and BTC+, aiming to earn about 3% annual yield by holding BTC+, without engaging in complex transactions.The user claimed that after the deposit, the minting and redemption functions of BTC+ suddenly paused. On July 13, a security incident occurred with BTC+, and they inquired in the official community on July 18 and July 20, but received no effective response. On July 22, Solv Protocol publicly disclosed the incident and stated that user assets were not harmed. On July 31, the project team announced the restoration of related functions, and staff informed that redemption could be initiated, but their address remained restricted, and the approximately 50 BTC corresponding assets could not be redeemed.The user stated that since July 31, they have continuously communicated through the official Discord, Telegram, and email, submitting materials such as proof of funds, transaction records, and wallet control. There have been about 60 emails exchanged between both parties, with about 50 sent by them. After contacting relevant personnel in September, they still did not receive an effective response. Their request is to lift the restrictions and restore normal redemption, while also stating that they initially came into contact with BTC+ through the BTC earnings-related page of Binance Web3 Wallet, and calling on Solv Protocol, Venus Protocol, and relevant investors and ecosystem parties to pay attention to the progress of the handling.

Data: Bitcoin's second round of price increase saw profits drop by 19%, with profit-taking weaker than in August

According to Axel Adler Jr's monitoring, although the price of Bitcoin has further risen to around $87,000, the market's profit-taking pressure is weaker than in August. During the second round of price increases, profits realized were 19% lower than during the first round, and losses also decreased.At the peak of the first round of increases on August 26, the price of Bitcoin was about $78,600, with profits realized over the past 7 days reaching $9.1 billion; at the peak of the second round on September 24, the price of Bitcoin rose to $84,100, with profits realized over the past 7 days amounting to $7.3 billion, a 19% decrease from the previous round. During the same period, losses realized over the past 7 days dropped from $2.6 billion to $1.5 billion. As of today, Bitcoin's net realized profit over the past 7 days is $4.3 billion.The Short-Term Holder SOPR has remained above 1 since August 20, indicating that the overall Bitcoin transferred by short-term holders is still in profit, but the profit margin has narrowed. At the peak on August 26, the corresponding profit margin for short-term holder SOPR was 2.8%; it dropped to 1.6% at the peak on September 23; and as of today, it has further decreased to 1%. During the pullback of Bitcoin to $76,500 on September 17, the short-term holder SOPR fell to a low of 1.003, with the profit margin for short-term holders transferring Bitcoin narrowing to 0.3%, but it did not fall below 1.

first_img Patent company Taction won the lawsuit, and Apple was ordered to pay 5.7 billion dollars

A federal jury in San Diego, USA, ruled on Friday that Apple must pay over $5.7 billion in damages for using patented technology from the haptic patent company Taction Technology, according to Caixin. This is the highest patent compensation amount in U.S. history. Taction sued Apple in 2021, claiming that its sales of devices infringing on touch technology improperly utilized related innovations; the case was dismissed in 2023 but was later reinstated by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.Apple issued a statement strongly opposing the verdict and the amount of damages, stating that the ruling lacks factual basis. Apple stated that its haptic engine is fundamentally different from Taction's technology, and tests conducted during the trial confirmed this, asserting that it did not use Taction's technology and would appeal. Taction's chief attorney, Lance Yang, thanked the jury and mentioned that the company waited five and a half years for the case to go to trial.The core of the lawsuit revolves around two vibration-based haptic sensor technologies designed to allow users to perceive the device's response to input. Taction claims that Apple’s haptic engine in the Apple Watch and iPhone used its inventions without authorization. Apple's haptic engine was launched in 2014 with the Apple Watch and was used in the iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus the following year, replacing the older vibration motors. Since Apple insists on appealing, the amount of damages will need to be determined first by the presiding judge before entering the appeals process for final confirmation.

first_img MEXC user: API not revoked after account was hacked, approximately 340,000 USD was transferred away

A MEXC user posted on X that their account was compromised after someone reset the security items. MEXC has confirmed the account was hacked, frozen the account, and assisted in recovery, but did not revoke the API left by the attacker. From 04:12 to 04:25 on September 27, 2026 (Beijing time), the account transferred out 322,110 USDT and 9,133,999 ONE, totaling approximately $340,000, about 27 minutes after the 24-hour transfer limit was lifted.The user stated that at 03:10 on September 25, they received a reset security item email that was not submitted by them, and about 10 minutes later, the request was approved. Subsequently, the account was logged in from an IP in Jakarta, Indonesia, bound to Google verification, and at 05:05, an API was created, approximately 83 seconds after logging in. At 10:55 that day, MEXC froze the account after a risk review and reverted to the original email. Customer service responded in writing that the review materials met the requirements, so the binding change was approved, and after the risk review, the account was urgently frozen and reverted to the initial email. The user changed their password and Google verification on September 26 but stated that the API was not revoked, and there were no related records in the security operation history.The user also claimed that there were no new login records in the login history when the assets were transferred out. They have submitted a formal claim to MEXC and attempted to report to the police, with the ticket number M2026092712031, requesting the platform to preserve logs, provide a written explanation of the review and API situation, and return the aforementioned assets. MEXC customer service stated that it is currently unable to confirm whether these transfers were initiated via APP, WEB, or API, and the issue has been forwarded to the relevant department.

first_img Bitget updates on the security incident progress: the stolen amount is revised to 387.5 million USD, and the withdrawal recovery time will be announced before 12 PM tomorrow

Bitget TradFi Chief Growth Officer Xie Jiayin issued an update on the platform's security incident, stating that the withdrawal time will be announced before noon tomorrow. The security team has identified the hacker's attack path and methods, and has grasped the details of how the attacker bypassed security measures, coming very close to tracing the source of the attack. The incident investigation by third-party security teams Mandiant and SlowMist is still ongoing, with a detailed report pending from the security team.On-chain tracking confirms that approximately $387.5 million has been transferred to the hacker's address, previously estimated at $351.6 million. This revision includes ZEC and TRX, and no other unauthorized transfers have been found. Xie Jiayin stated that the stolen funds at the platform level will be fully covered by the Bitget User Protection Fund, ensuring that user assets are not subject to any losses.Bitget has officially launched a fund recovery bounty program, offering a 5% bounty for voluntarily freezing the attacker’s funds and a 5% bounty for voluntarily recovering funds. The bounty also applies to assistance already provided. The platform has published the attacker's address, a real-time tracking dashboard, and a submission portal, with relevant information also available for submission through Bybit's Lazarus bounty platform.

Caixin: Poker expert Hu Zheweng has suffered three consecutive losses in the cryptocurrency market and has filed a lawsuit against Jump Trading and Chinese professor Zhang Yongfeng

According to Caixin, poker master and seasoned cryptocurrency investor Hu Zheweng made significant bets during the three waves of cryptocurrency frenzy involving ICOs, algorithmic stablecoins, and AI tokens, but faced consecutive failures. Hu Zheweng claimed to have invested in the blockchain project Stratis, achieving a return of "over 1000 times."According to disclosed information, Hu Zheweng invested approximately 80 million USD in algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD (UST) and its sister token LUNA from May 2021 to May 2022, with the peak market value of his holdings exceeding 800 million USD, but the price of LUNA subsequently nearly dropped to zero.In addition, Hu Zheweng has filed a lawsuit in Chicago, USA against the globally renowned quantitative trading firm Jump Trading and its related companies and executives in the cryptocurrency business, seeking at least 500 million USD in damages. After experiencing Stox and Terra, Hu Zheweng has not left the cryptocurrency market; last January, he bet on a new project by a Chinese computer professor Zhang Yongfeng. Zhang Yongfeng entered the Computer Science Department of Tsinghua University in 2007 and is currently a tenured associate professor in the Computer Science Department at Rutgers University in the USA. He has been sued by Hu Zheweng on multiple charges including "securities fraud." It is reported that the tokens issued by the organization founded by Zhang Yongfeng, in which Hu Zheweng invested millions of dollars, have fallen over 99.6% from their peak in 2025.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.