L2

Vitalik: The quality of the underlying proof system of L2 networks is equally important and should gradually enter the second stage as it develops

ChainCatcher news, in response to community member Daniel Wang's proposed naming label #BattleTested for the L2 network Stage 2, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik posted on the X platform stating: "This is a good reminder: the second stage is not the only factor affecting security; the quality of the underlying proof system is equally important. This is a simplified mathematical model that shows when to enter the second stage:Each security council member has a 10% independent 'break' chance; we consider activity failure (refusal to sign or key unavailability) and security failure (signing the wrong thing or key being hacked) as equally likely; the goal: to minimize the likelihood of protocol collapse under the above assumptions.Stage 0 security council is 4/7, Stage 1 is 6/8; please note that these assumptions are very imperfect. In reality, council members have 'common mode failures': they may collude, or all be coerced or hacked in the same way, etc. This makes both Stage 0 and Stage 1 more insecure than shown in the model, so entering Stage 2 earlier than the model suggests is the best choice.Additionally, note that by turning the proof system itself into multiple independent systems via multi-signature, the probability of proof system collapse can be greatly reduced (this is what I advocated in previous proposals). I suspect that all Stage 2 deployments in the past few years will be like this. Considering this, here is the chart. The X-axis is the probability of proof system collapse. The Y-axis is the probability of protocol collapse. As the quality of the proof system improves, the optimal stage shifts from Stage 0 to Stage 1, and then from Stage 1 to Stage 2. Using a proof system of Stage 0 quality for Stage 2 is the worst.In short, @l2beat ideally should showcase proof system audits and maturity metrics (preferably proof system implementations rather than the entire aggregation, so we can reuse them) and stages."

Ethereum L2 Reddio announces token economic model: total supply of 10 billion, with 8% allocated to community distribution

ChainCatcher news, according to the official announcement from the Ethereum Layer2 network Red­dio, the token economic model for RDO has a total supply of 10 billion tokens, which are allocated as follows:Community (8.00%): Aimed at accelerating user adoption and rewarding early supporters through marketing activities, airdrops, community incentives, and educational initiatives.Security and Network Incentives (25.00%): The largest portion allocated for mining rewards, which contribute computational resources to the proof-of-authority consensus layer. This allocation has a 10-year no-cliff period, enhancing long-term network security and validator loyalty.Ecosystem Growth (22.76%): Supports project development, grants, partnerships, and the launch of dApps. Nearly half (70.1%) of this funding will be unlocked at TGE, facilitating immediate growth activities, while the remainder will vest after 48 months.Treasury (6.96%): Held for operational flexibility, liquidity provisioning, and emergency actions under DAO governance. At TGE, 15% is liquid, with the remaining portion unlocking linearly over four years.Contributors (21.80%): Allocated to core team members and early builders. A 12-month cliff ensures commitment, followed by a 24-month linear vesting. This aligns with long-term incentives and ensures continuity of contributions.Strategic Investors (15.48%): Aimed at early supporters providing funding and market support. Tokens will undergo a 6-month cliff period, followed by an 18-month linear vesting period. This timeline promotes strategic alignment while preventing speculative pressure.

Vitalik proposed the "L2 Security and Finality Roadmap," highlighting the three core directions of Ethereum L2

ChainCatcher news, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin published a long article titled "A simple L2 security and finalization roadmap," which outlines three core directions for optimizing Ethereum L2 security and finality:Expand data capacity: Increase the Blob space to 6 through the Pectra upgrade, and expand it to 72 (or gradually increase to 12-24) in the upcoming Fusaka upgrade at the end of the year, to meet the L2 transaction throughput demands;Implement a hybrid proof system for rapid finality: Use a 2/3 multi-signature mechanism (optimistic proof + ZK proof + TEE trusted hardware proof). If ZK and TEE verify simultaneously, finality is immediate; if only one is verified, it requires a 7-day optimistic challenge period. The security committee can urgently upgrade the proof logic but is subject to a 30-day delay, balancing immediate finality with attack resistance;Build a unified ZK proof aggregation layer: Standardize the proof aggregation protocol across the ecosystem, allowing multiple applications to share the cost of a single proof (e.g., 500,000 Gas), significantly reducing ZK verification overhead and promoting the adoption of L2, privacy protocols, and other scenarios. The goal of this roadmap is to achieve L2 cross-chain bridging finality within 1 hour and reduce costs through short-term hybrid verification mechanisms, while gradually eliminating TEE reliance with a long-term goal of full ZK implementation, ultimately establishing an efficient, secure, and trustless L2 ecosystem.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators