SUN

Sun Yuchen: Both FDT and FTX are incidents of misappropriating user funds, but the FDT incident is more severe

ChainCatcher news, Sun Yuchen posted on platform X stating that the theft of user funds by First Digital Trust (FDT) and the misappropriation of user funds by FTX are both very serious and malicious incidents of misappropriation of user funds. However, if one must compare the severity, the severity of First Digital Trust (FDT) is even more serious, more than ten times worse than FTX. The reasons are as follows:FTX misappropriated user funds. Although users were unaware of the misappropriation, at least internally within FTX, SBF made it appear as if there was a pledge loan, representing Alameda Research, pledging a large amount of FTT/SRM/FTX shares/Maps tokens to lend user funds. At least on the surface, this looked like a loan, and a certain degree of collateral was provided based on a percentage. In contrast, FDT directly misappropriated and stole assets without user authorization and without users being aware, without even the internal collateral process.SBF misappropriated user funds from FTX without user authorization, but ultimately used them for investments, with at least the vast majority going into high-quality companies such as Robinhood and AI companies like Anthropic, without engaging in embezzlement or indulgence. In comparison, FDT currently appears to have diverted the vast majority into private companies, completely misappropriated and embezzled, without making any substantial investments.After the incident was exposed, SBF's attitude was at least proactive; he actively sought remedies, hiring law firms to find ways to recover user assets. In contrast, Vincent Chok Zhuo Junqiang, after the facts of misappropriation were exposed, still insisted on denying the truth, pretending that nothing had happened, showing great subjective malice.After the FTX incident, U.S. regulatory agencies and law enforcement quickly took action, actively intervening in the FTX bankruptcy proceedings and arresting those involved with FTX (including SBF), actively controlling the situation, helping users mitigate losses, and avoiding a significant impact on the reputation of the U.S. financial system.

Sun Yuchen: First Digital Trust has had negative net assets for three consecutive years and is suspected of violating the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Ordinance

ChainCatcher news, Sun Yuchen once again accused FDT of fraud. He stated: First Digital Trust (FDT) openly disregards all fiduciary duties and regulatory norms, claiming to represent Techteryx in managing a securities portfolio of up to $501.8 million for the Aria Commodity Finance Fund in its own legal name. According to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO), any individual or company providing securities portfolio management services must hold a Type 9 license from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, unless the service is limited to its wholly-owned subsidiaries or provided by its 100% owned parent company. Clearly, FDT is not only ignoring the fundamental principles of the trust industry but is also openly contemptuous of Hong Kong's banking and investment laws. In other words, its actions have completely disregarded Hong Kong's regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies.Furthermore, Sun Yuchen believes that FDT has not only fallen into negative assets but has also had negative net assets for three consecutive years. By the end of 2024, its net assets are projected to be negative HKD 100 million. This does not include the massive losses caused by its large-scale misappropriation of user assets. Even so, it can still publicly manage billions of dollars in public assets in the market today.Previously, First Digital responded: it will take legal action against Sun Yuchen's "slanderous behavior."
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators