A few days ago, the first White House Crypto Summit concluded, and its impact is just beginning…

The price of BTC has dropped below $80,000. The crypto market is facing the largest liquidation since the LUNA collapse. Investors' sensitivity to risk has significantly increased, with funds accelerating towards projects that have anti-drawdown properties. Meanwhile, investors are scrutinizing token economic models more rigorously, raising a key question: Is there a token model that can withstand market fluctuations and traverse bull and bear cycles?

Source: Bravos Research

The Temptation and Cost of Inflation

The choice of inflation models by most tokens is not accidental. By increasing supply, they reward developers, communities, and early investors, thus rapidly launching the ecosystem. However, when market sentiment is low, the expansion of circulation combined with shrinking demand can easily lead to a downward price spiral. Ethereum is a typical example. Its early design did not set a total supply limit, leading to long-term inflation issues and causing anxiety among users. It wasn't until the EIP-1559 proposal introduced a burning mechanism that the selling pressure was effectively alleviated, which had a profound impact on Ethereum's economic model and market performance.

But the question is: If inflation is the fuel for launching an ecosystem, can deflation become the brake against cycles?

The Logic of Deflationary Scarcity

In stark contrast to Ethereum's struggles is Bitcoin's four-year halving cycle. After each halving, the rate of new coin production is halved, and scarcity drives the price into an upward channel—this mechanism allows Bitcoin to maintain its deflationary properties even through multiple bear markets, becoming the only "digital gold" that transcends cycles in the crypto market.

This logic is being emulated by more projects. For example, the Solana ecosystem, which has gained popularity in this cycle, is attempting to balance ecological incentives and value storage through the dynamic adjustment of inflation rates in the proposal SIMD-0228 for the token SOL. This proposal, put forward by Tushar Jain from Multicoin Capital and others, has a core mechanism: when the SOL staking rate exceeds 50%, the issuance is reduced to curb inflation; when it is below 50%, issuance is increased to incentivize staking. This "elastic inflation" design reveals a key principle—deflation is not a complete denial of inflation, but a balancing tool that dynamically interacts with it.

Source: SIMD-0228 Proposal

Even during market downturns, the number of token holders for many projects has not decreased but rather increased, which may be the most effective proof of the deflationary token model in the face of declining markets.

The Triple Value of Deflationary Mechanisms

In the current counter-cyclical environment, the value of deflationary mechanisms is becoming increasingly prominent, with breakthroughs occurring at three levels:

First, scarcity premium. When the growth rate of circulation is lower than the growth rate of demand, the value of the token naturally increases.

Second, anti-inflation properties. In the context of fiat currency overproduction and regulatory shocks, deflationary tokens become a safe haven for funds.

Finally, community consensus reinforcement. Transparent burning actions directed at the community convey the long-term commitment of the project party, attracting value investors rather than short-term speculators.

However, to realize these values, specific tools are needed for support. Current mainstream deflationary mechanisms include:

Token burning: This involves transferring a portion of circulating tokens to a black hole address, such as the daily on-chain burn of BONK.

Staking lock-up: This incentivizes long-term holding through rewards, such as Solana's dynamic adjustment mechanism in the SIMD-0228 proposal.

Ecosystem consumption: This involves using tokens as gas fees or collateral, forming a positive cycle of use and destruction.

Micro Samples of Deflationary Design

The market performance of $BONK remains relatively stable, and my research shows that it possesses a multi-layered deflationary model. The core of this model is a transparent on-chain burning mechanism, including automatic destruction during ecological interactions and event-driven large-scale burns, continuously reducing its circulation in the overall volatile market to achieve a deflationary economy. To some extent, it realizes "following the rise, not the fall."

The daily burning mechanism is integrated into all ecological applications of BONK, with the amount of destruction continuously increasing. Additionally, the BONK community regularly initiates event-driven large-scale burning activities, such as the "BURNmas" plan last December, which burned 16.9 trillion BONK (approximately $54.52 million), accounting for nearly 1.8% of the total supply of BONK (approximately 92.7 trillion). In February of this year, another 20.25 trillion BONK (approximately $36.96 million) was burned. These burning measures not only enhance investor confidence but also provide price support by reducing selling pressure.

Source: Solscan

These measures produce a triple effect:

First is the reconstruction of scarcity. As the supply of tokens in circulation decreases, the perception of their value increases, which may exert upward pressure on the token's price.

Second is the establishment of community trust: burning tokens sends a positive signal to the community. It indicates that project governance is committed to the long-term growth and sustainability of the token, allowing the community to see a "real monetary" commitment.

Third is the potential for exponential growth: the price depression caused by continuous burning creates more room for token growth. For traders seeking high-risk investments with high return potential, this is an attractive point.

In a highly volatile market environment, the value of token economics is gradually beginning to emerge; it is no longer an abstract formula in a white paper but a survival skill that determines the life and death of a project. Using burning to combat inflation, as SOL balances staking and scarcity through the SIMD proposal, we see that deflationary mechanisms are shifting from optional strategies to essential survival needs. In certain moments of the crypto market, the design of token economic models can determine survival more than marketing narratives.