Grasping the Future of the Crypto Market: Investors Should Maintain a Strong Curiosity

The sharing on Saturday surprised me a bit.

Because the original Twitter account was banned, we applied for a new one. This was my first time using this new account to communicate online with everyone, so I originally thought that there wouldn't be many students leaving comments or asking questions this time. Therefore, I planned to spend a longer time sharing with everyone:

• Possible economic trends in the country over the next 10 to 15 years;

• Possible market trends for our country's assets under this trend;

• How individuals can allocate and invest their assets to hedge against various potential risks in this trend.

I didn't expect the number of questions left in the comments to exceed that of any previous online communication.

As a result, after answering everyone's questions, I could only spend the last half hour sharing roughly on the three topics mentioned above. Due to the very short time, many logical points that would normally require at least two hours or even longer to explain could not be elaborated in detail, so in the last half hour of sharing, I mainly expressed my views and conclusions.

During the last half hour of sharing, I spoke quite frankly, and to avoid any complications, I deleted all the recordings. I hope everyone understands.

However, for the first hour and a half of sharing, I feel that some topics can be elaborated further in this article.

Many of these topics are related to AI agents, and several students left comments asking about the Virtual platform.

I checked the records of WeChat articles, and the first time I mentioned the website of Virtual was in the article on October 31. At that time, when I wrote this article, I didn't have much confidence in this platform. As I wrote in the article, I merely regarded it as a platform similar to an ICO for financing AI agents.

Previously, I had written about another AI financing-related project, which was the IMO of ORA. However, after observing for a while, IMO did not become popular, so my interest in this financing method in AI gradually faded. Therefore, when I discovered Virtual, it was merely out of curiosity, purely sharing knowledge to introduce it to everyone.

Interestingly, under the comments of that article, there wasn't a single question about this project or its tokens. So I became curious:

• Did any readers go to this platform based on the information in the article?

• If they did, do they have any thoughts or feedback? Even negative feedback is fine.

I remember that around 2021, when I first introduced Bored Apes in an article, at least one reader left a comment. Although it was negative, it was still a form of feedback.

No matter how difficult the Virtual project is to understand, isn't it a bit easier to grasp than NFTs?

Did any readers take a serious look?

About a month later, in the article on December 2, I dedicated an entire article to a detailed introduction of this co-founder interview. I felt that many of his thoughts and views were quite good and aligned with my interests.

I always emphasize in my articles that when I look at a project, the primary focus is on the project's founder. If a project's founder is competent, the project track is viable, and the strategy is generally appropriate, then the project is worth paying close attention to.

Therefore, I believe there is potential for the Virtual ecosystem to gain momentum.

However, there were still no comments or feedback about this project in the comments of that article.

I am equally curious: Did anyone among the readers take the time to read that interview carefully? If they did, do they have any thoughts about this project?

The reason I have this doubt stems from my own experiences and lessons.

I once wrote in an early article that I did not recognize the value of Bitcoin the first time I heard about it, which caused me to miss out on very early benefits.

But later, when everyone still referred to it as a scam, I decided to seriously study Bitcoin:

Even if it is a scam, I want to see how it is a scam.

This study changed the trajectory of my life.

This experience taught me a significant lesson:

In this ecosystem, when I discover something new, regardless of whether it is good or bad, I should follow my curiosity and take the time to understand it.

If, after understanding, it is not too outrageous, too against my principles, or too contrary to my tastes, I can boldly try it while controlling the risks;

If, after understanding, I do not participate due to insufficient knowledge, there is nothing to regret—after all, I did my best;

But if I don't even take the time to understand it, merely treating it as news or information, reading it and then discarding it, I may very well miss out on significant opportunities.

Therefore, I often call on everyone in my articles to awaken their curiosity and to be a bit more curious and bold in exploring new things in this ecosystem.

Opportunities are often found through curiosity and the desire to explore.

Without curiosity and the desire to explore, even if opportunities are right in front of you, you may not be able to seize them.