Will Bitcoin, which is being incorporated, eventually become another type of U.S. stock?
The correlation between Bitcoin and U.S. stocks is gradually increasing.Author: jk, Odaily Planet Daily
The price fluctuations of Bitcoin have long shown two completely different trends compared to traditional financial markets, driven by two entirely different narratives: as a risk asset, Bitcoin often performs similarly to U.S. stocks during periods of high market sentiment and increased risk appetite, exhibiting a high positive correlation. This is mainly due to the increased participation of institutional investors, making its capital flow patterns similar to other high-risk assets. However, during market panic or the outbreak of risk events, Bitcoin is viewed as a safe-haven asset, decoupling from U.S. stock trends and even showing negative correlation, especially when investors lose confidence in the traditional financial system.
These two narratives complicate Bitcoin's role, making it both a part of risk assets and potentially a safe-haven asset. Which one will it be? Especially at this moment when Trump is about to take office?
Price Correlation: More "Safe-Haven" than U.S. Treasuries
According to TradingView statistics, over the past decade, the correlation between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 index has been 0.17, lower than other alternative assets. For example, the correlation between the S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity Index and the S&P 500 during the same period was 0.42. Although Bitcoin's correlation with the stock market has historically been low, this correlation has increased in recent years. In the past five years, its correlation has risen to 0.41.
However, Bitcoin's strong volatility makes this correlation data less reliable: the relationship between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 showed a negative correlation of -0.76 on November 11, 2023 (around the FTX incident), but by January 2024, it had reached a positive correlation of 0.57.
In contrast, the S&P 500 has performed relatively steadily, with an annual return rate of about 9% to 10%, serving as a benchmark for the U.S. economy. Although the overall return rate of the S&P 500 may be lower than that of Bitcoin, it excels in stability and lower volatility.
Logarithmic comparison of Bitcoin and the Nasdaq index. Source: FRED
It can be seen that during macro hot events, the two usually exhibit strong correlation: for example, during the market recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, both showed significant upward trends. This may reflect an increased demand for risk assets against the backdrop of loose monetary policy.
However, during other periods (such as 2022), the trends of Bitcoin and the Nasdaq diverged significantly, showing a weakening correlation, especially during periods of black swan events specific to the crypto market, where Bitcoin experienced unilateral crashes.
Of course, in terms of periodic returns, Bitcoin can easily outperform the Nasdaq by a wide margin. However, purely from the perspective of price correlation data, the correlation between the two is indeed increasing.
A report released by WisdomTree also mentioned a similar viewpoint, stating that although the correlation between Bitcoin and U.S. stocks is not high in absolute terms, recently this correlation is lower than the return correlation between the S&P 500 index and U.S. Treasuries.
Trillions of dollars in assets globally use the S&P 500 index as a benchmark or attempt to track its performance, making it one of the most closely watched indices in the world. If an asset can be found that has a -1.0 (completely inverse) and relatively stable correlation with the S&P 500 index, it would be highly sought after. This characteristic means that when the S&P 500 index performs negatively, this asset could potentially provide positive returns, demonstrating hedging characteristics. Although stocks are generally considered risk assets, U.S. Treasuries are viewed by many as closer to "risk-free" assets. The U.S. government can fulfill its debt obligations by printing money, although the market value of U.S. Treasuries, especially long-term ones, may still fluctuate. A significant discussion point for 2024 is that the correlation coefficient between the S&P 500 index and U.S. Treasuries is approaching 1.0 (positive correlation 1.0). This means that both asset classes may rise or fall simultaneously during the same period. The simultaneous rise or fall of assets is contrary to the original intention of hedging. This phenomenon is similar to 2022, when both stocks and bonds recorded negative returns, contradicting many investors' expectations of risk diversification. Currently, Bitcoin does not show strong hedging capabilities against the return rate of the S&P 500 index. From the data, the correlation between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 index is not significant. However, recently, the return correlation between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 index is lower than that between the S&P 500 index and U.S. Treasuries. If this trend continues, Bitcoin will attract more attention from asset allocators and investors, gradually becoming a more attractive investment tool over time.
From this perspective, compared to the risk-free asset of U.S. Treasuries, Bitcoin only needs to be the "safe-haven asset that runs faster than U.S. Treasuries," and investors will naturally choose Bitcoin as part of their portfolios.
The chart shows the 50-day rolling correlation between Bitcoin prices and the S&P 500 index in 2022. On average, the correlation is about 0.1, with peaks exceeding 0.4 and lows below -0.1. Source: WisdomTree
Institutional Holdings: Increasing ETF Proportion
The role of institutional investors in the Bitcoin market is becoming increasingly important. As of now, the distribution of Bitcoin holdings shows a significant increase in institutional market influence, and this trend of centralization may further drive the correlation between Bitcoin and U.S. stock trends. Here’s a detailed analysis:
According to data, 19.9 million Bitcoins have been mined so far, with a total supply of 21 million, leaving 1.1 million yet to be mined.
Among the mined Bitcoins, the top 1,000 dormant addresses with holdings of over 5 years account for 9.15%, equivalent to about 1.82 million Bitcoins. This portion of Bitcoin typically does not enter the circulating market, effectively reducing the active supply in the market.
Additionally, according to Coingecko data, the top 20 listed companies, including Microstrategy, hold 2.63%, approximately 520,000 Bitcoins, with Microstrategy alone holding 2.12% of the total Bitcoin supply (about 440,000 Bitcoins).
On the other hand, according to The Block's data, as of the time of writing, all ETF institutional holdings currently amount to 1.17 million Bitcoins.
- If we assume that the Bitcoins in dormant addresses, the unmined quantity, and the holdings of listed companies remain unchanged, then the theoretical circulating supply in the market = 19.9 million - 1.82 million - 520,000 = 17.56 million
- Institutional holdings proportion: 6.67%
It can be seen that ETF institutions currently control 6.67% of Bitcoin's circulating supply, and this proportion may further increase in the future as more institutions get involved. From the same period last year to this year, we can observe that the share from exchanges has been significantly compressed, while the share from ETFs has further grown.
Bitcoin holding proportions. Source: CryptoQuant
Similar to U.S. stocks, as institutional investors gradually increase their holdings in the market, their investment decision-making behavior (such as increasing or decreasing positions) will play a more critical role in price fluctuations. This phenomenon of market centralization can lead to Bitcoin's price movements being significantly influenced by U.S. stock market sentiment, especially in the flow of investment funds driven by macroeconomic events.
"Americanization" Process
The impact of U.S. policies on the Bitcoin market is becoming increasingly significant. In this regard, the current situation is still largely unknown: based on Trump's current style of governance, if crypto-friendly individuals occupy important decision-making positions at key policy junctures in the future, such as promoting a more lenient regulatory environment or approving more Bitcoin-related financial products, the adoption rate of Bitcoin is bound to increase further. This deepening of adoption will not only solidify Bitcoin's status as a mainstream asset but may also further bridge the correlation between Bitcoin and U.S. stocks, both of which reflect the trajectory of the U.S. economy.
In summary, the correlation with U.S. stocks is gradually increasing, primarily due to the common response of prices to macro events, the significant impact of institutional holdings on the market, and the potential influence of U.S. policy trends on the market. From this perspective, we can indeed use the trends of U.S. stocks to gauge more about Bitcoin's future trends.
