Learn from history: Where are the 1,200 crypto projects that raised seed funding two years ago now?

Author: Lattice Fund

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Introduction

Last year, we released the 2021 Seed Stage Review to gain a clear understanding of the trends in the seed stage that year. How many companies shipped to mainnet? How many found product-market fit? Who launched tokens?

With the 2024 report, we now shift our focus to 2022 to better understand the progress and trends of cryptocurrencies in the seed stage. This report analyzes over 1,200 publicly disclosed crypto pre-seed and seed rounds since 2022, providing insights into trends across the entire industry, specific sectors, and ecosystem levels. As with our previous reports, we are open-sourcing our database for further exploration and analysis. We invite your feedback and welcome any corrections; feel free to reach out to us at hi@lattice.fund.

Executive Summary

Projects from 2022 raised funds during one of the most prosperous periods in cryptocurrency history. Teams announcing raises this year likely benefited from the bull market of 2021 and early 2022. Given the market's bubble, we expect these metrics to show negative impacts compared to teams funded during the bear market. Our analysis confirms these expectations, but there are also positive takeaways.

Since 2022, nearly 1,200 companies have collectively raised $5 billion in funding, a 2.5x increase from the previous year. Here are the key highlights:

2022 Breakthroughs

• Any year will have some significant success stories, and 2022 was no exception.

• In infrastructure, we saw seed funding raised by re-staking protocol Eigenlayer, wallet-as-a-service provider Privy, and parallel EVM Sei. Notably, each of these teams helped kickstart broader narratives.

• In the DeFi space, the breakthrough stories of 2022 include Perp DEXs like Vertex and Apex, as well as the specialized NFT exchange Blur.

• Gaming is a major consumer segment, with investments nearing $700 million. Despite significant funding, the two largest success stories raised relatively little. Pixels and PlayEmber each raised less than $3 million in seed funding.

Launching in a Challenging Market

• Despite facing a bear market, nearly three-quarters of projects successfully launched products on mainnet. Compared to 2021, achieving product-market fit (PMF) and follow-on funding has become more challenging, with both metrics significantly declining year-over-year.

• 18% of the cohort has shut down or ceased development, up from 13% in 2021.

• Only 12% of teams secured follow-on venture capital, a sharp decline from 50% in 2021.

• Only 15% of projects launched tokens, down from 50% in 2021.

Renewed Focus on Infrastructure and CeFi

• After the detours of 2021, investors returned to more established areas like infrastructure and CeFi, investing nearly $2 billion and nearly $450 million, respectively, which is a 3x and 2x increase from 2021 figures.

• 80% of CeFi projects and 78% of infrastructure projects have launched on mainnet, reflecting strong investor confidence in these areas.

• Results at the application layer are more complex, with 66% of consumer Web3 products and 68% of DeFi teams delivering products to mainnet.

• Consumer teams are more likely to cease operations, with the closure rate nearly double that of infrastructure teams.

• Payment (86%) and wallet (90%) projects are the most likely to launch on mainnet.

Ethereum Leads, Bitcoin Persists

• In terms of fundraising, Ethereum remains the dominant Layer 1 ecosystem, while Bitcoin projects continue to show resilience.

• $1.4 billion was invested in Ethereum-based projects, followed by nearly $350 million in Solana-based projects.

• Fundraising in the Polkadot ecosystem saw a significant decline, down 40% year-over-year.

• Teams building on Solana and Ethereum are similarly likely to secure follow-on funding.

• In contrast, no teams in the NEAR ecosystem were able to raise follow-on funding.

• Projects in the Binance ecosystem are the least likely to remain active, with one-third of teams ceasing operations. Solana's failure rate also doubled from 2021, reaching 26%.

• Bitcoin projects continue to endure, with 100% of teams still active two years later.

Methodology

This report is based on a combination of first-party data, supplemented by insights from Messari, Root Data, Crunchbase, and other sources. To assess the progress of the seed stage market, we categorized each company by stage, including "active but not delivered" and "no longer active," with additional breakdowns by ecosystem and industry. While we have made every effort to ensure data accuracy, we acknowledge that errors may arise due to reliance on third-party data. In the ecosystem, we only included those ecosystems with more than 15 teams able to raise first-round funding in the charts.

One of the most challenging aspects of this analysis is determining whether projects have achieved product-market fit (PMF). Unlike the objective milestone of "product delivery," PMF is often subjective and can be fleeting, especially in the rapidly changing crypto market. We combined on-chain data from analytics providers like Dune Analytics and DeFiLlama with information from company websites and blogs to make these determinations.

(Note: Lattice's accompanying graphic categorizes the analyzed products from left to right into stages such as active but not delivered, product delivered, PMF achieved, token launched, no longer active, acquired, and shut down.)

Seed Round Project Status

Our seed stage review began with internal analysis aimed at identifying projects gaining attention but not yet raising follow-on funding, which could become targets for Lattice. However, it turned out that this data was sufficient to share with the broader industry.

This research is valuable as it reveals the health of various sectors, ecosystems, and the broader early market over time. Given that most seed stage teams raise funds to sustain operations for about two years, we decided to use this timeframe to review the seed year.

In 2022, over 1,200 cryptocurrency companies raised over $5 billion in seed and pre-seed funding. Looking back at this cohort, 72% of companies have launched on mainnet or equivalent networks, up from 66% last year. Meanwhile, 18% of projects either failed to deliver or have shut down, consistent with last year's data. However, the most notable decline is in teams seeking PMF, which has dropped to nearly 1.5%. It is worth noting again that for off-chain projects, it is difficult to assess how attractive they actually are, so we may miss some teams that have early PMF.

During the bear market, attracting users became increasingly difficult as retail interest waned. Hot sectors in 2022, such as NFTs, the metaverse, and gaming, are not attracting users as they did two years ago. In contrast, infrastructure projects serving other crypto companies have proven to be more resilient. A prime example is Eigenlayer, which announced its seed round funding in January 2022 and successfully expanded its AVS listing strategy, with middleware projects eager to collaborate.

This serves as a good reminder that today's hot sectors do not always emerge with investor interest. For example, the metaverse saw 75 teams raise nearly $280 million, but none found PMF, with over 21% of teams having shut down, and it is hard to hear anyone talking about the metaverse. Compared to DePIN or AI, they had almost no registrations in 2022 but are among today's hottest topics.

(Data chart showing that 72% of seed round financing projects in 2022 have already launched on mainnet.)

Venture Capital Tightens Wallets

Teams in 2022 raised funds during one of the most prosperous periods in cryptocurrency history. Teams announcing raises in 2022 likely did so before the collapses of Terra and FTX, which led to a deep freeze in the market. Despite an overall increase in funding of 92% compared to 2021, the follow-on market tells a different story. Only 12% of teams in 2022 were able to raise more funding in the past two years. This starkly contrasts with 2021, when nearly one-third of teams secured follow-on funding.

Interestingly, the number of token launches also declined year-over-year, with only 15% of the cohort launching tokens in 2022, down from 50% in 2021. This significant decline can be attributed to two main factors: 1) The 2022 cohort likely missed the bull market window, with many teams rushing to launch products in the first half of 2024, only to run out of steam throughout the summer. 2) Due to declining DeFi liquidity, the launch of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) has become less popular, and token issuance has shifted to centralized exchanges (CEXs). CEXs now charge hefty listing fees, often reaching seven figures, and require a significant portion of the token supply. The saturation of the token market, combined with the selectivity of CEXs and the diminished appeal of DEX launches, has made it more challenging to bring tokens to market.

Flying Towards Infrastructure

Investment in infrastructure has doubled compared to 2021, reflecting a clear shift in investor focus. While interest in infrastructure seems to wane by the end of 2024, it was the most favored sector throughout 2022 and 2023. In contrast, DeFi is the only sector to see a year-over-year decline in investment, likely due to the consequences of DeFi's rapid profit schemes and Ponzi economics that surged in the summer of 2020.

Investors are reaping rewards by following the infrastructure trend, with these teams most likely to secure follow-on funding and launch on mainnet. In contrast, DeFi and consumer teams are more likely to launch tokens but also more likely to shut down. The application layer is feeling the pressure—without additional funding, teams are forced to either launch tokens or shut down.

(Pie chart showing that seed round financing projects across various tracks generally have over 70% already delivered on mainnet (black portion); however, most have not found PMF.)

Not All Ecosystems Are Equal

Cross-ecosystem development reveals significant disparities in project success rates. Nearly 80% of Ethereum-based projects have delivered products, outperforming Solana, which delivered products for only 61% of its projects, down from 75% in 2021. While Solana has clearly weathered the bear market well, the massive influx of capital at the end of 2021 may have led to overfunding.

The failure rate of seed stage teams in 2022 remains consistent with that of 2021 teams, but significant differences have emerged within ecosystems. As observed last year, teams within the Binance ecosystem are the most likely to shut down, and now teams in the Avalanche ecosystem have joined this trend. Notably, the failure rate of Solana-based projects has doubled, with over 25% of teams ceasing operations. This increase may be due to the influx of speculative capital during the bull market, leading to a particularly challenging period for Solana following FTX, resulting in overexpansion and subsequent attrition. However, it is clear that teams that have weathered this difficult phase have been rewarded. Additionally, it is worth emphasizing the resilience of teams in the Bitcoin ecosystem, which not only continue to deliver but also demonstrate extraordinary persistence, reflecting the reliability of the Bitcoin network itself.

The follow-on funding landscape in 2022 reveals a significant decline across all major ecosystems. Only 13% of Ethereum-based projects were able to secure additional funding, down from 31% in 2021. Similarly, only 13% of Solana startups raised follow-on funding, a sharp decline from 30% last year. Notably, ecosystems like Flow, StarkNet, and NEAR have struggled to attract further investment, with their projects failing to secure follow-on funding, highlighting the challenges these platforms face in maintaining developer and investor interest. This is particularly interesting given the amount of funding that flowed into each ecosystem's foundational layer at the end of 2021 and into 2022, with Dapper Labs raising nearly $600 million in 2021, NEAR raising $500 million in 2022, and Starkware raising nearly $200 million in 2021 and 2022.

What’s Next

The situation for the 2022 vintage is more challenging than for 2021. Finding PMF remains a challenge in a sideways market without a significant influx of new retail net participants. Some teams have turned to hot sectors for retail participation today (such as gambling-related applications). Additionally, the significant reduction in teams securing follow-on funding will limit the time these teams have to pivot to new things. Finally, the significant increase in seed stage startups and the tightening of the token issuance market mean that more teams are vying for narrower token issuance opportunities.

Complicating all these issues is that investors have turned to today's hotter sectors (such as DePIN and AI) and ecosystems (such as Base and Monad). This underscores that returns do not come from chasing the current hot topics but from what will be hot in 1-2 years.

We have no doubt that the seed stage market in cryptocurrency will remain healthy, with nearly all funds actively participating, including a16z's newly launched crypto startup school. For this cohort of teams hoping to raise Series A and beyond, the robustness of the later-stage market remains a question. Even within our own portfolio, we see that shifts in narrative can impact founders' ability to raise funds.

Industries and Trends to Watch

Privacy-Enhancing Applications

Recently, there has been an increase in investment in privacy-enhancing technologies, with two trends in privacy infrastructure emerging over the past year: Zero-Knowledge Transport Layer Security (ZK TLS) and Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE). ZK TLS adds a privacy-enhancing layer to secure communications on the current internet. ZK TLS projects like Opacity are collaborating with Lattice portfolio company NOSH to enable Nosh to leverage existing web2 delivery markets. In this example, drivers log into the Nosh driver app using Doordash credentials, which the protocol treats as proof of identity. As the demand side of the network matures, drivers can deliver for Doordash in the Nosh driver app, and if the order comes from the protocol network (rather than Doordash), the driver can earn tokens. We expect to see more use cases for this new privacy primitive.

Similar to ZK TLS, advancements in FHE infrastructure could lead to a new class of encrypted applications, from private DeFi to DePINfied data collection. An early practical example of this technology is sharing sensitive health information with AI companies. Lattice portfolio company Pulse is using the DePIN flywheel to collect health data that can be monetized by allowing researchers to analyze encrypted genetic data to identify patterns or biomarkers without accessing the raw genetic information, thus maintaining confidentiality. As privacy infrastructure advances and merges with broader trends—namely, AI agents and decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN) for data collection—it could usher in a new wave of consumer and enterprise-focused applications.

Augmented Reality Applications and Infrastructure

Broader technological trends significantly influence the direction of cryptocurrency founders' efforts and the flow of investor capital. We have witnessed this with the surge of AI-related startups in 2023 and 2024 following OpenAI's large-scale AI improvements. With Apple, Meta, and Snap all launching significant strategies in the AR space, we expect to see an increasing number of crypto startups emerge as AR-related technologies eventually go mainstream. One example from the Lattice portfolio is Meshmap, which is building a decentralized 3D world map. As the installation of AR devices is expected to explode in the coming years, 3D maps for application developers to build experiences will become crucial. The excitement for the virtual universe in 2021 may have been premature, but the lessons reported last year and this year are that people are not paying attention to where Alpha can be generated.

Blockchain-Supported Collectibles Market

Collectibles trading is largely associated with digital asset trading (especially NFTs), but the blockchain-supported collectibles market is on the rise, from spirits markets like BAXUS to watch platforms like watch.io and Kettle. Collectibles trading is already a massive off-chain market but is plagued by issues such as lack of instant settlement, physical custody, and reliable authentication.

We believe these challenges present opportunities for a "Blockchain-Enabled Collectibles Market" (BECM) designed specifically to meet the needs of collectibles traders. BECM enables instant transactions through cash settlement, significantly reducing settlement times from weeks to seconds by using stablecoins, and employs NFTs to represent physical assets held by trusted custodians. This model can unify fragmented markets, enhance liquidity, eliminate the burden of personal storage, and establish trust through verification. BECM also supports financial innovations, such as borrowing against collectibles, making the act of collecting financially more vibrant. With these efficiencies, BECM has the potential to significantly expand the total addressable market for collectibles by introducing more traders, liquidity, and inventory.

Ecosystem Rotation

Our tables and charts only include ecosystems with more than 15 projects raising venture financing, with the minimum number being close to 15 projects, thus just being excluded. Perhaps unsurprisingly, we expect significant changes in ecosystems, considering the trends we are seeing, with Polkadot, NEAR, and Avalanche being replaced by L2 ecosystems and emerging L1 and L2 ecosystems like Monad, Berachain, and MegaETH.