Legal experts: The SEC's lawsuit against Green United mainly targets specific fraudulent activities and will not affect the normal sale of cryptocurrency mining hardware

ChainCatcher news, according to Decrypt, the lawsuit against the cryptocurrency company Green United by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently drawn industry attention. The SEC accuses Green United of defrauding investors of $18 million through the sale of so-called "Green Boxes" mining equipment. Last week, a federal judge dismissed Green United's motion to dismiss, sparking speculation on social media that the sale of cryptocurrency mining hardware could be considered securities. However, several legal experts stated that there is currently no reason for excessive concern.

Ishmael Green, a partner at Diaz Reus law firm, pointed out that as long as the mining equipment is sold with the understanding that it will be used for mining by the end user, there should be no issue. "In the Green United case, the sales agreement for the mining equipment states that Green United will control and operate the system, which is the problem." Hadas Jacobi, a consultant at Reed Smith law firm, stated that although the SEC did not explicitly mention hosted mining, it could have implications for hosted mining services. While Green United attempted to portray the case as the SEC misunderstanding hosted mining, the judge denied its motion to dismiss. Currently, the judge has only decided to hear the case and has not ruled on the SEC's arguments.